| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Terrifying
dailymailukdailymailuk
From: Greg
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 7:37 AM
To: John Rolls
Subject: Terrifying
A REALLY A FRIGHTENING THOUGHT….
Columnist Andrew McCarthy gives us what probably is the most important question regarding the upcoming presidential election: appointments to the Supreme Court.
“If Mitt wins the nomination, I will enthusiastically support his candidacy. For my friends who have hesitation on that score, I’d just ask you to keep these things in mind:
1. Justice Scalia just turned 78
2. Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year
3. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August
4. Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago. In addition, Justice Ginsburg has Pancreatic Cancer.5. Justice Stephens has already said he would retire and is just waiting for Obama to be reelected.
The next president could appoint as many as 5 new Justices over the next 4 years, or over the next 8 years if a new President gets a second term. This election is about much more than the ObamaCare Tax.
Whomever we elect as president in November is almost certainly going to choose at least one new member of the Supreme Court, in addition to hundreds of other life-tenured federal judges, all of whom will be making momentous decisions about our lives for decades to come.”
If you don’t think it matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, THINK AGAIN.
So for anybody who is thinking of not voting because your favorite didn’t get nominated, or writing in a candidate who can’t win, imagine this:
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ERIC HOLDER
After you have stopped gasping, kindly send this to your list of concerned citizens.
Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makingsuch material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any suchcopyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest inreceiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that gobeyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
I think a President Romney would be a great way to ensure ever expanding corporate monopolies controlling our everyday lives, smooth sailing for a supranational fiat currency in which the US gives up its Constitutional right once-and-for-all to control its own money supply, and of course unchecked Presidential war powers both internationally and experienced domestically as a police state.
Romney/Ryan 2012 all the way!!
So what your basically saying is that it’ll be the same as it ever was, the same that it ever was.
Indeed.
You aren’t going to change the Country with a Republican, and you aren’t going to change it with a Democrat either……
It doesn’t matter who is in the White House, sheeple. The enemy is US.
I believe the “Enemy” is a very old adversary resurfacing due to unrestricted corrupt persons in positions of leadership. It amounts to nothing less than taxation without representation. A very old adversary indeed facilitated by an even older adversary…plain old ordinary greed..