| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Wash Times To BO: What Did You Know & When Did You Know It?
A justifiably tough column out today from the Washington Times regarding the Benghazi scandal – namely why there was a need for a cover up, and how involved was President Obama? It is a review of the scandal that paints a very troubling and accusing portrait of an Obama White House unwilling to share truth, and always looking to deflect responsibility. It also points a finger directly at presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. Well worth your time to read…
BENGHAZI: What did the President know and when did he know it?
Howard Baker’s famous question from the Watergate hearings has become the gold standard of investigative questions for Presidential scandals.
While many people have wanted to ask that question about any number of so-called scandals, there is one scandal where that question must be asked sooner rather than later.
What is it?
It is the Benghazi scandal.
In three weeks, the one-year anniversary of Benghazi will happen. One year on, there are still no answers but there are now even more questions.
What really happened in Benghazi? What was that outpost really for since it was not a consulate? Were there really four hundred American surface to air missiles taken from that compound and were they destined for Syria?
The conventional wisdom is that it is never the actual scandal that brings down a politician but the cover-up. It is the cover-up in Benghazi that has never made sense, unless there is something really damaging involved.
Watergate was infamously described by the Presidential Spokesman Ron Zeigler as a “third rate burglary.” Benghazi is not a third rate scandal. Men died at Benghazi.
continue article at The Ulsterman Report:
Only one remedy: Impeach.
Add this scandal to the others you get RICO!