| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
Obamacare Page 1,004: You Must Have RFID Chip Implanted in Your Body
On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel.
This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”.It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.
In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community.
Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government’s website so what I’m about to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself.
H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the FDA in 2004.
Source: http://www.therightplanet.com/2012/07/obamacare-page-1004-you-must-have-rfid-chip-implanted-in-your-body/
http://polidics.com/news/another-hidden-secret-in-obamacare-rfid-chip-implants.html
Seriously? I’m 100% against the ACA, but attempting to put a thoroughly debunked story back into the news cycle only hampers the legitimate efforts to get rid of this ridiculous legislation. Did you actually read the sources you cited or just copy and paste? The first source you cite spells it out in bold letters: “This story is essentially an urban legend.”
march 23rd 2013 … its november 17th 2013 and I still dont have one and I never will No one I love will either if they listen to me its a bad time to have small children .
This is actually not true. What is stated above was in the original draft, but was taken out later when the final draft was finalized. I sell the ACA products, but I am not a backer of this law. I will say that about 50% of my clients get their insurance with little or actually no cost and very small deductibles. If you don’t make that much money this law actually does help you, but who’s going to pay for it? It will in the end bankrupt this already bankrupt country. I do want to repeat that the RFID chip is not in the final bill that was passed. I know this because I had to do extensive research on this bill since I do sell it.
Joshpeck247: Are you mental or just another bent LibProg? “with little or actually no cost” Who the hell do you think is actually paying for the medical communities slave labor?
People like you make me sick, go to mother Russia and live the good communistic life you so desperately crave and leave me, my family and most of all, MY AMERICA ALONE!
Star, did you immediately stop reading and respond at “with little or actually no cost?” Because, if you look at the VERY NEXT SENTENCE, Josh states, “but who’s going to pay for it?” Followed by, “It will in the end bankrupt this already bankrupt country.” Just pay attention and read thoroughly before making remarks otherwise we are all going to see more of these ridiculous posts as more people like you believe and make judgment on things that they don’t fully absorb first.
The part about the RFID chip is accually:
Subtitle C
Food and Drug Administration
1
In general
2561.National medical device registry
(a)Registry
(1)In general
Section 519 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is amended—
(A)by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
(B)by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
(g)National Medical Device Registry
(1)The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the registry) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—
(A)is or has been used in or on a patient; and
(B)is—
(i)a class III device; or
(ii)a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.
(2)In developing the registry, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods for—
(A)including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;
(B)validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), including, to the extent feasible, use of—
(i)data provided to the Secretary under other provisions of this chapter; and
(ii)information from public and private sources identified under paragraph (3);
(C)integrating the activities described in this subsection with—
(i)activities under paragraph (3) of section 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk identification);
(ii)activities under paragraph (4) of section 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of drug safety data); and
(iii)other postmarket device surveillance activities of the Secretary authorized by this chapter; and
(D)providing public access to the data and analysis collected or developed through the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.
(3)
(A)To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, academic, and private entities, develop methods to—
(i)obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including—
(I)Federal health-related electronic data (such as data from the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act or from the health systems of the Department of Veterans Affairs);
(II)private sector health-related electronic data (such as pharmaceutical purchase data and health insurance claims data); and
(III)other data as the Secretary deems necessary to permit postmarket assessment of device safety and effectiveness; and
(ii)link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry.
(B)In this paragraph, the term data refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.
(4)Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations for establishment and operation of the registry under paragraph (1). Such regulations—
(A)
(i)in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold on or after the date of the enactment of this subsection, shall require manufacturers of such devices to submit information to the registry, including, for each such device, the type, model, and serial number or, if required under subsection (f), other unique device identifier; and
(ii)in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold before such date, may require manufacturers of such devices to submit such information to the registry, if deemed necessary by the Secretary to protect the public health;
(B)shall establish procedures—
(i)to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3); and
(ii)to permit analyses of linked data;
(C)may require device manufacturers to submit such other information as is necessary to facilitate postmarket assessments of device safety and effectiveness and notification of device risks;
(D)shall establish requirements for regular and timely reports to the Secretary, which shall be included in the registry, concerning adverse event trends, adverse event patterns, incidence and prevalence of adverse events, and other information the Secretary determines appropriate, which may include data on comparative safety and outcomes trends; and
(E)shall establish procedures to permit public access to the information in the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.
(5)To carry out this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
.
(2)Effective date
The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.
(3)Conforming amendment
Section 303(f)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking 519(g) and inserting 519(h).
(b)Electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of unique device identifiers
(1)Recommendations
The HIT Policy Committee established under section 3002 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj–12) shall recommend to the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in section 519(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection (a).
(2)Standards, implementation criteria, and certification criteria
The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph (1), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.
Check it out yourself… go to the site posted below and hit ctrl F (find) and copy anything from above and you will find it black and white from the bill. Don’t let ignorance cloud your judgement see it for yourself.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3200/text
My favorite part of your post is how you’re referencing a version of the bill that wasn’t approved… It even says what version it is in your link… I mean jeez, check it out yourself… Go to the site posted below and hit ctrl F (find) and copy anything from above and you will find it black and white from the bill. Don’t let ignorance cloud your judgement, see it for yourself. (The approved bill was H.R. 3590. Go ahead and look, it’s easily verifiable.)
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3200/text
You must also kiss my ass!
Section 2521, for anyone who actually bothers to read the legislation, is referring to a registry of medical devices (pace-makers, etc) for patients who have them. There is no delegation of authority for the secretary to force implanted devices (Class II devices)
alright guys heres the problem: the current bill says that there will be no microchip implants thats
great but what was this implant thing doing in the original bill anyway? and what if the original one
would have got passed? you see the problem is not whether or not the current bill requires
microchips but why the original one did apparently there are people in congress who believe
we need implanted microchips otherwise that part of the original bill would not have been
there to begin with. thank god someone caught it and removed it.