Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
by Jason DeWitt
A stunning judicial move has exposed Barack Obama’s possible concealment of unlawful actions from a federal judge.
The Texas court that blocked Obama’s executive action on immigration has ordered the Justice Department to answer allegations the governmentmisled him about part of the plan.
And one legal analyst says one of Obama’s lawyers could face jail time for lying to the court under oath.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen has ordered federal government lawyers to appear in his court March 19 in Brownsville. The hearing is in response to a filing last week in which the Obama DOJ belatedly acknowledged a massive number of deportation reprieves were granted before Hanen’s Feb. 16 injunction.
DOJ attorneys concealed this fact from the judge, declaring that officials wouldn’t accept such requests under Obama’s action until Feb. 18.
But on March 4th, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, the lead plaintiff in the 26 state case against Obama’s amnesty move, exposed the fact that Obama handed a stunning 100,000 illegal aliens three-year reprieves and work permits, in violation of the judge’s injunction.
Abbott immediately filed for contempt charges against Obama’s DOJ.
And now the clearly irate Judge Hanen is demanding the Obama Administration answer for their deception and illegal acts.
And one analyst thinks Obama may need to pardon one of his attorneys — Kathleen Harnett — when this is all said and done. From Legal Insurrection:
I would not be at all surprised if at the end of that hearing, at least one Government lawyer is removed in handcuffs for contempt. Now, since we’re in Texas, he/she would be entitled to a “Personal Recognizance” bond to get out of Jail pending a hearing on the contempt, but that will still be damaging. My guess is that if they’re licensed in Texas, they’ll be eating a Bar Sanction as well for violating the Texas Creed.
The day after filing the motion, Jan. 15, Justice Department lawyer Kathleen Hartnett appeared in Hanen’s court to emphasize that there was no problem delaying things for a while because the administration wasn’t implementing the president’s changes.
“In that [motion] we reiterated that no applications for the revised DACA — this is not even DAPA — revised DACA would be accepted until the 18th of February,” Hartnett told the judge, “and that no action would be taken on any of those applications until March the 4th.”
A moment later, just to be sure, Hanen said to Hartnett, “But as far as you know, nothing is going to happen in the next three weeks?”
“No, your honor,” Hartnett said.
“OK,” Hanen answered. “On either?”
“In terms of accepting applications or granting any up-or-down applications,” Hartnett said.
“OK,” said Hanen.
“For revised DACA, just to be totally clear,” Hartnett said.
Hartnett did not mention the 100,000 illegal immigrants to whom the administration had already rushed to grant longer protections and work permits under the president’s order.
The DOJ attorneys EXPLICITLY LIED to a Federal Judge hearing the case in order to get an “extension” to file a brief, and have now been CAUGHT in that lie.
WOW. This is stunning. Will one strong, independent American judge finally put an end to this lawless cabal, and put one of Obama’s lying supplicants in jail?
http://toprightnews.com/?p=8613
Revelation 13:3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
It’s great how you’re copypasting a story about how some DOJ lawyers “EXPLICITLY LIED” about something and then explicitly lying yourself to suggest that Obama himself did the lying.
Samma vaca, my friend. Whether you’re lying through malice or ignorance, you should try it some time.
I guess some Obots won’t change and turn upon Obama.
Pity.
They’ll go down with him.
“In the case of words that the Tathagata knows to be unfactual, untrue, unbeneficial (or: not connected with the goal), unendearing & disagreeable to others, he does not say them.”
Samma vaca. I guess you think it’s easier to be a Buddhist now that you’ve left all Buddhist communities and can just make it all up without anybody calling you out on it?