| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Judge Takes the Next Step, Attempts to Normalize Incest
It is called progressivism for a reason. The only way its proponents can achieve their objectives is to progress toward it by increments. Otherwise, decent people would finally rise up in horrified opposition to defend what is left of civilization.
Homosexuality has been imposed to the point that failing to endorse it will get you righteously denounced as a thought criminal and could easily cost you your job. It’s time to turn up the heat on the boiling frog another notch. What’s next on the liberal agenda? Maybe pedophilia. Or maybe incest:
Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and “unnatural” but is now widely accepted.
He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.
Thank you Judge Neilson for illustrating the effect widespread reliance on contraception and abortion has had on morality.
“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner,” the judge said.
At least, not if the jury is made up of progressives.
As for pedophilia, Neilson seems to consider that battle already won, since it is closely tied to homosexuality:
“If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”
Actually, they have not gone. Their smug elitism leads liberals to believe that the progressive march toward absolute depravity is historically inevitable. But contrary to their dogma, moral values are not arbitrary and superficial social constructs, and no society that rejects them will survive for long.
The decay of Western economic and military strength as a result of the decay of its morality is already evident. The only question is whether we reassert morality ourselves and turn back from ruin, or let our eventual conquerors do it for us.
On tips from Wingmann, Dean D, and Lyle.
Source: http://moonbattery.com/?p=47860
