(Before It's News)

Eileen T. Toplansky / American Thinker
In light of comments such as those by American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, one needs to consider the context of recent events in Ferguson. Weingarten asserts that . . .
the fact remains that on Aug. 9, an unarmed black teenager was shot and killed. Given that we are a nation of laws, one can only hope that the lack of an indictment isn’t tantamount to any lack of zeal on the part of the prosecutor to do the job he was supposed to do to enable the grand jury to arrive at an impartial and fact-based decision [.]
This case once again reminds us that there is still much work to be done to achieve racial justice in America. It tells us that our moral compass and legal systems do not always align.
Weingarten epitomizes the leftist ideology that continually must find a racial basis for anything that occurs in this country. That the facts do not align with what the liberals desire is infuriating to them and thus the real tragedy of Ferguson is:
- . . . that in order to fully accept the evidence of the case, news commentators feel compelled to say that eyewitnesses to the attack on the police officer were black, thus implying that whites, by the very nature of their melanin level, would not have been capable of abiding by the rule of law. It continues to feed Obama’s premise that race should be the determining factor in everything. But, indeed, if race does make a difference in certain situations, why didn’t the first black president and his black attorney general reach out to the Ferguson black community and tell “one and all to respect a lawful grand jury finding.” Instead these men used their power and “invited mayhem.”
- . . . that owners and operators of the town’s shops have had their windows smashed, their stores looted and their merchandise destroyed and burnt. In fact, the majority of affected stores are black owned. Does saying this imply that black hoodlums would care more about black-owned establishments being protected? Thugs are thugs. If it had been white-owned stores does that mean this hooliganism would be more readily accepted? Since when do we consider looters as having a sense of deportment? In fact, as former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said, “the first minute you break a window, you are put in handcuffs” whatever your race.
Read more at American Thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/11/the_real_tragedy_of_ferguson_is.html#ixzz3KZMm5Gfm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY5X0KETO78
THE FAKE SHOOTING OF MICHAEL BROWN IN FERGUSON EXPOSED! – IT’S A HOAX!
Play video
What exactly have we seen? A video of the shooting footage does not exist! All we have seen is a dummy corpse laying on the ground with his face hidden. Someone who allegedly got shot multiple times…
00:09:03
Added on 8/25/14
49,466 views
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY5X0KETO78
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jboQPpySwXg Cops setting fires
Ferguson is a state sponsored false flag. You know it and I know it.
Yet when a group of Black thugs attack and kill innocent Caucasians (has occurred many times in the last several years) is your brain and word processor going 1,000 MPH, cranking out stories of woe and injustice? I doubt it; this is what makes racial hypocrisy such as yours and those like you so unpalatable and unacceptable. Try again.
In the Ferguson thing, I keep getting from the Media how the basic problem of black crime and riots is all do to that there are no men in black homes, the fun part of this, [especially when it's Fox News whimpering] is in the fact that no one knows or considers the reason there are no black men in black homes, (that the government ran then out)! If a family gets in trouble and has to go on government aid the first government act is to force the man out of the house, if there married, the second government action is to force a divorce, the third government action is then to go after the man to recover government aid, the forth government action is to arrest them if they don’t pay, [getting even better], if the man survives this and gets a job and re-marries the mother, the government then goes after the mother as well as the man for the back support money, the reasonably expected out come of this is the family then has to go back on government aid the man is ran out by the government and gee no black man in the house and no one can figure out why! (Trapper).