Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Originally published on LonelyConservative.com
The Obama administration was never too interested in what the courts have to say, at least when the courts rule against them. So it’s really no big surprise that the EPA is implementing its water rule despite a judge’s ruling against it.
A defiant Environmental Protection Agency on Friday put into effect controversial new water regulations, despite a federal judge’s decision to place a temporary hold on the rule for fear it would harm states.
The EPA says it is interpreting Thursday’s injunction as applying only to the states that sued in the North Dakota district court, according to a spokeswoman. The Clean Water Rule, also known as the Waters of the U.S. rule, goes into effect Friday as planned, except in the 13 states that filed the North Dakota lawsuit.
“The Clean Water Rule is fundamental to protecting and restoring the nation’s water resources that are vital for our health, environment and economy,” said Melissa Harrison, a spokeswoman for the agency. She says the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers “have been preparing to implement the rule on the effective date of Aug. 28.” (Read More)
The EPA should be banned from having anything to do with with the nation’s water resources considering what they did in Colorado.
Read more at LonelyConservative.com
Follow The Lonely Conservative on Twitter – twitter.com/lonelycon