Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Thanks to FoIB David Williams, we learn that California is considering outlawing this practice, and for the very reason we’ve long put forth:
Of course, by next year it may be a moot point.
■ Next, SoIB Gail S tips us to the latest in the struggle to find lost life insurance policies:
Which is true, of course, but belies two other more pressing issues: the fact that it’s the insured’s responsibility to make sure his or her beneficiaries know about any policies and, two, even if they *could* afford to track down who’s currently at room temp, there’s no effective means to do so. As we reported almost 4 years ago:
Oh, I’m sure they’ll get right on that.
■ Finally, longtime FoIB Jeff M alerts us that North Carolina Blue Cross/Shield’s woes aren’t going away any time soon:
But that’s only part of the picture:
“Reserves” are the insurance company’s “cushion” against future claims. It’s important that they be sufficient to handle not only anticipated claims (which follow generally predictable trends) but unexpected ones as well (say a major listeria outbreak). Jeff points out this little nugget on that article:
“The insurer reported having 3.2 months of reserves, a measure of how long it could operate if it did not collect any more in revenue, down from 3.6 months at the beginning of 2015“
Seems a little light, no?