| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Regarding IIG’s Retraction of Defamatory Claims against Billy Meier
Dear IIG,
I would like to bring to your attention that the information here is demonstrably incorrect.
Information on, and linked from, this page clearly refutes the so-called deconstruction as factually inaccurate.
Further, the new hi-resolution photographs here reveal further details that in themselves render both the theories and the attempt to duplicate the WCUFO using models inadequate and incorrect.
Additionally, the enhanced image here reveals that what was presumed to simply be a manipulated black background is in fact an outdoor environment, photographed at night…from above the craft.
Both Mr. Bartholomaus and Mr. Langdon have been advised of the above but have not provided any substantiated refutation of the new analysis and evidence. Since the claims presented on your site effectively accuse Mr. Meier of having hoaxed the photos with models ostensibly made by him, and since such accusations and conclusions are now clearly refuted as false, unsubstantiated and defamatory, I request that you immediately remove not only your page referred to above but also any and all other insinuations that Mr. Meier has falsified, hoaxed, etc., any of his evidence.
To be clear, IIG has presented anything but an objective examination of Mr. Meier’s evidence. For example, this comment:
“This is an example of Billy Meier apparently not expecting people to know how the images in his photographs could be created and published them as “evidence” of being contact from extra-terrestrials.”
…from here is also unsubstantiated, prejudicial and defamatory.
Therefore, now that un-refuted expert analysis using state-of-the-art technology has shown the WCUFO to not be a model of any kind, not only is a complete removal – and public retraction – of any such claims, innuendos and assertions requested, in fact demanded.
Consequently, it also appears that Mr. Meier is entitled to your financial award, as well as to any offered by James Randi’s organization, to which this is also being copied. Certainly - after more than a dozen years - your own relentless challenge of the authenticity of Mr. Meier’s evidence is sufficient to qualify…especially since your conclusions have now been clearly shown to be wrong and Mr. Meier’s evidence proved to be authentic.
Please inform us as to how soon you will be awarding Mr. Meier’s non-profit group, FIGU, the $100,000.
Equally prompt compliance with our requests for the removal and public retraction of the defamatory information is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Authorized American Media Representative
The Billy Meier Contacts
Copyright 2011 – All Rights Reserved. Please do not copy or reproduce the content on this blog for re-publication without the author/s written permission. Thank you.
Regarding IIG’s Retraction of Defamatory Claims against Billy Meier originally appeared on They Fly on December 18, 2013.
Source: http://theyflyblog.com/regarding-iigs-retraction-of-defamatory-claims-against-billy-meier/12/18/2013
