For years people have been arguing about whether or not we actually landed on the moon. Many believe the moon landings were nothing more than a hoax, filmed on a movie set. One of the strongest arguments for this has been that the tread on the bottom of the astronaut’s boots does not match the impression left on the lunar surface. Phil Poling of Parabreakdown looks into this claim in the following video:
Psyop – Persuade. Change. Influence.
How psyops works first they release a tiny bit of information, then they send their own people out to make
plausible but bad, false claims after that some NASA professor or one director can come out and correct all the little tin-foil hats out there.
But this time even the narrator is wrong, at 1:34 you can see the boots standing next to the space-suit, did they not leave the boots on the moon he said?
The moon landings were nothing more than a hoax, filmed on a movie set. And in low Earth orbit (nothing near the Van Allen radiation belts)
Ever who that fool narrator is, perhaps needs to educate themselves a bit more concerning x-ray technology. The picture claimed to be an x-ray photo of the boots is in fact x-ray, however the claim of that second photo of the entire suit being an x-ray photo is completely wrong! A lie! A false claim! Take it from someone who knows x-rays. Take a closer look at that entire suit photo. It is most likely the work of an artist trying to reproduce and imitate that of an x-ray photo had come up with an extremely lousy result. A true x-ray would not look like that. I’m not saying it couldn’t be some other similar technology (because I only experience in x-ray photos) but I’m am saying it’s not x-ray!
I highly doubt it being some other form of technology due to the high prevalence of errors in the artwork.
i also doubt that NASA would make a true x-ray photo of any type of their own classified technology which the suit consists of, such as breathing components and other such technology. That is why they hire artist to imitate an x-ray photo. Also I would to like to know the source of these images, not just to say “from NASA”, but the actual source and when they were first made public. That’s the key question…
Those are the inner boots. The outer ones are the ones with the lines grip pattern. There are videos showing too many lines on the boots that match the footprints but does anyone really believe the lunar landing was real any more anyway?
What ’til’ said is correct. In the 1970′s, I actually got to go to the Huntsville Space facility and they had the boots on display then. The lined ‘traction’ boots were an ‘overboot’ for the ones shown in the video above. That said, there is a ‘line count error’ between the number of cleats that were on the boots they had on display for years and the number of cleats shown in the lunar surface print – and it’s been known about for years. While the rebuttal from NASA was ‘there was more than one man there, and more than one set of boots’, I find it hard to believe that each astronaut had a different cleat count on their individual boots. Then again, they have an answer for everything. I still think that the answer is found in ‘The Shining’, but then again, it was just a movie, right?
Psyop – Persuade. Change. Influence.
How psyops works first they release a tiny bit of information, then they send their own people out to make
plausible but bad, false claims after that some NASA professor or one director can come out and correct all the little tin-foil hats out there.
But this time even the narrator is wrong, at 1:34 you can see the boots standing next to the space-suit, did they not leave the boots on the moon he said?
The moon landings were nothing more than a hoax, filmed on a movie set. And in low Earth orbit (nothing near the Van Allen radiation belts)
Ever who that fool narrator is, perhaps needs to educate themselves a bit more concerning x-ray technology. The picture claimed to be an x-ray photo of the boots is in fact x-ray, however the claim of that second photo of the entire suit being an x-ray photo is completely wrong! A lie! A false claim! Take it from someone who knows x-rays. Take a closer look at that entire suit photo. It is most likely the work of an artist trying to reproduce and imitate that of an x-ray photo had come up with an extremely lousy result. A true x-ray would not look like that. I’m not saying it couldn’t be some other similar technology (because I only experience in x-ray photos) but I’m am saying it’s not x-ray!
I highly doubt it being some other form of technology due to the high prevalence of errors in the artwork.
also the arms are missing for some reason
i also doubt that NASA would make a true x-ray photo of any type of their own classified technology which the suit consists of, such as breathing components and other such technology. That is why they hire artist to imitate an x-ray photo. Also I would to like to know the source of these images, not just to say “from NASA”, but the actual source and when they were first made public. That’s the key question…
Those are the inner boots. The outer ones are the ones with the lines grip pattern. There are videos showing too many lines on the boots that match the footprints but does anyone really believe the lunar landing was real any more
anyway?
What ’til’ said is correct. In the 1970′s, I actually got to go to the Huntsville Space facility and they had the boots on display then. The lined ‘traction’ boots were an ‘overboot’ for the ones shown in the video above. That said, there is a ‘line count error’ between the number of cleats that were on the boots they had on display for years and the number of cleats shown in the lunar surface print – and it’s been known about for years. While the rebuttal from NASA was ‘there was more than one man there, and more than one set of boots’, I find it hard to believe that each astronaut had a different cleat count on their individual boots. Then again, they have an answer for everything. I still think that the answer is found in ‘The Shining’, but then again, it was just a movie, right?