| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Tall Ancient Giant Skeletons on Exhibit for the World to See (Video)
.jpg)
11 Jul 16
Very interesting Timing, Don’t You Think?
20+ Foot Tall Ancient Giant Skeletons On Exhibit for World to See
ECUADOR GIANTS. Nephilim and Anunnaki Giants are now on Display in Ecuador.
ECUADOR GIANTS SHOWN TO THE WORLD
In Loja province, Southern Ecuador and Peru border, many strange relics have been uncovered.
Bones and full skeletons very similar to those of humans but of incredible size.
ARE YOU COMPLETELY PREPARED?
IT’S THE MOST IMPORTANT PREP YOU CAN DO!
The Bible tells us that every human has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God which is is a heart-penetrating truth. He has provided a way to cleanse us of our sins since we can never be “good enough” to cleanse ourselves. That avenue to God’s grace, mercy and forgiveness (the cleansing of our sins) is through His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ of Nazareth Who is equally God.
Not one of us are guaranteed a “tomorrow”. Has your time run out? Will you continue to ignore the promptings of God the Holy Spirit or have you awakened to the essential need for God, risking eternal damnation?
God the Holy Father, God the Holy Son and God the Holy Spirit are One God, the true, living, uncreated God Who is ever-present, all knowing, all powerful and all loving. He desires that every single person be forgiven, saved and to live eternally with Him. He is our only real protection and His love for you is unchanging. Accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, the true Messiah, today.
You can’t take your salvation for a test drive. You’re all-in or not.
Admit to Him that you are a sinner in need of forgiveness, that you are truly sorry for your sins. Acknowledge that He died for your sins, rose from the dead and lives forevermore. Invite Him into your life and to help you to turn from sin. Rejoice! You just became a Christian! Now trust in Him and get to know Him through the Bible which tells us everything we need to know and through prayer/talking to Him. He eagerly desires relationship with you.
hopefully this will end the debate about whether or not giants ever existed in recorded history
I think the debate will continue. Check this out from 2013:
http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/creationists-claim-erich-von-danikens-model-giant-skeleton-as-proof-of-bible
Well found. Man, I didn’t know von Daniken had his own theme park. That’s the funniest thing I’ve read all day.
Yep
The “skeleton” isn’t real.
^^^ I saw it on the Interwebs, so it must be true!!!!!
[facepalm]
I saw it on TV so it must be true!
Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900’s
A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900’s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/
yes I read this news.
I even read the verdict of the court and the answer from the Smithsonian simply stating they cannot give ‘em back because they destroyed them.
But no explanation why (there are still some giant skulls in Sicilia but no on display after requirement by the US).
What I would like to understand, is why hide this ?
Are they afraid mainstream religion will be put into question ?
that we will realize that we have been here far longer then we think ?
Even though, why hide it ? (except being afraid religious idiots will just imply that the “holy” books are scientific proof).
Refusing such investigation, is blocking us in our thought evolution and perception of reality.
IT SUCKS !!!!!
You are blocking your own “thought evolution” ! Why hide it ? You ask ? Because there is a Great delusion in effect and you don’t believe it ! Here is your “religious idiot” giving you the facts and the truth,what you do with the information is your own responsibility. Scientific proof the “Bible” (ancient Scriptures) stand alone with the Truth like no other writings can ! http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html
Hi Truthy,
I can’t open the links ! I would have loved to discuss it this topic with you.
However, one can consider the bible (depending on which one) a fascinating historical artifact on many levels. So historical / archeological, philosophical and social sciences.
But in no case does it justify other “hard” sciences (such as flat earth and other bullshit).
I’ll try again later.
Truthy,
Is the Earth flat – please be concise (yes or no).
Muslims said ‘not flat’ 600 years before the Evil X-ians decided to copy them and declared Earth to be round… even though their scriptures demand a flat Earth.
@Rain : in this domain of “fringe” science, everything needs to be taken with caution.
but the artifacts that he is showing remain super interesting.
It’s always the same: whatever theories you emit, if they are not mainstream and not published through the “respected” media, then only alternative media accept to publish.
Hey, where did you read this “verdict of the court”?
I can’t even find any evidence anywhere that any such verdict ever existed and it should be public record, as all supreme court decisions are.
Can you provide the doc for this decision by the court?
no I can’t, after a 30second check, it’s false…Sad but not strange.
I can find back however, the klaus dona conference on the giant skulls of sicilia if you are interested (it’s somewhere on youtube)
Yeah, you know there’s a real problem with an assertion such as this “verdict” when every other mention of it, anywhere, cycles back to a singular original source, in this case, WNDR.
I already know quite a lot about Klaus Dona, and I find him very suspect.. but I’m always willing to give benefit of the doubt, and continue to explore his claims.
Still, I approach the guy with extreme caution..
it is clear that darwin made several miscalculations regarding evolution and world history
Totally (but I am no creationist also far from that).
Besides, I never understood this fight of creationist VS darwinist.
Darwin always stated that his study was purely theoretical and not fully demonstrated (e.g the white and black butterflies in the coal mines).
After all, his book is called the theory of evolution and not the universal law of evolution.
And in any case, even if he was right, I don’t see why that would not be the way of God
@Ô Nanarchiste Bourré
The argument that God used Evolution is called the gap-theory which is something churches teach despite it not being supported by the Bible.
Creation took a week, including a rest day, a literal week. Evolution needs millions or billions of years. The two are incompatible but the real point is that you see the two positions as diametrically opposed? The more you look into this subject the more you’re going to notice there are only ever two ways and they are always 180 degrees apart.
Lets hope RAIN gets back to you because i’m picking he’s about to show you something Darwin couldn’t have known. Something that, according to the scientific method, utterly makes the case for intelligent design. It’s called irreducible complexity which only became visible using modern microsopes.
Darwin argued for evolution based on evidence of natural selection and you’re right about him accepting the limitations of his theory. Namely that Darwin expected missing links to eventually turn up but here we are more than 150yrs later and we still haven’t found any.
Hello Mayhem,
thanks for the info.
If I remain open minded to many things, I don’t think that the bible genesis is to be taken literally.
If it took 7 days to make creation, that means space / time already existed. Meaning creation started before. See where I’m going with this logic ?
Furthermore, the concept of time is hugely debatable. It’s a created concept to describe our perception of movement.
I think it’s going to be hard to find a missing link because the homo sapiens sapiens has probably been there a lot longer than expected.
I’d like to quote Dona Klaus on this : “Either our perception of time is completely wrong or we have been here for a lot longer than officially admitted”.
What I like is that most belief always start the same on the Creation “in the beginning, there was the Verb” or the “Song”.
It’s all about harmonics ! I think that’s where we should start to know more about universe, unfortunately, I’m not smart enough to do it myself.
Hello yourself, Ô Nanarchiste Bourré, and it is an open mind you’ll be needing if you continue with this confab. It is my boast that sense, reason and logic are no barrier to faith and an honest pursuit of truth will lead to a choice between two faith based options. Do you get that? The big bang and evolution are just as reliant on faith (the evidence of things not seen) as is the creation account.
First off the language of the creation account demands a literal interpretation…
And there was evening, and there was morning
… and, yes, the benchmark is set very high. I’ll not make excuses for God and fully expect His every word to be both true and readily defensible.
Our friend RAIN made the case for intelligent design and i only ask that you don’t brush it off without considering the ramifications. The Bacterial Flagellum, if you’re honest with yourself, could not have evolved and must have been designed. There is no grey area regarding irreducible complexity.
The next thing to consider is the lack of scientific support for the millions or billions of years argument. And before anyone mentions carbon dating the following article is to be considered…
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/radioactive-dating-failure/
… wherein links can be found to the scientific literature. This example of 50yr old rocks being dated into the millions of years is but one. I can produce similar evidence for live snails, or shellfish, being dated at many tens of thousands of years old. In a nutshell carbon dating relies upon gross assumptions. Assumptions that have no business being called sensible, reasonable or logical.
Finally it’s interesting that you say “harmonics” given recent CERN-LHC discoveries whereupon it was found that the smallest known particles were made from nothing that unexpectedly vibrates. Hmm, harmonics, unexplained vibrations or “In the beginning was the word” what’s the difference?
As for not being smart enough, you have the tools at your very fingertips to change all that, you’ve just got to want to. And the reason you won’t get hellfire and brimstone from us is because Hell is nothing more than the common grave and eternal punishment is not something the Bible teaches irrespective what you might have heard in church.
Hello Mayhem,
I have nothing against faith (just so we are clear). It is quite the contrary. and I do not oppose faith to science. If I am close to the materialist and pessimist philosophical schools, I do know, by personal experiences, that there is an invisible creation to us, I do know that there are a lot more than angels and demons and I do believe in life after death (I actually never died but it wasn’t far from it and you experience really weird things during those moments of great distress)
I do oppose bigotry on the other hand because it limits the potentiality of our being. Like some stated here, scriptures in christian and jewish faith are by the hand of Man (under divine inspiration or so) – on the contrary of islam where it is a “recitation” word by word of god.
Anyway, I know that I know nothing (;p)
I started watching the video given by Rain & Clucker but after a 15h hour work day, I needed some sleep !
Carbon dating is a wonderful yet very limited tool. And dating rock is impossible. What can be dated is the patine deposited on a rock or in it’s carvings.
Plus other method for dating exist based on other criteria than on carbon decay (I think it like isotope separation in solids or something like that, by measuring the distance of each isotope and the viscosity of a material they can find a range of dates for the formation of a material). And each method give a really wide range for dates because, well, the viscosity of a material changes depending on its environment’s evolution.
I think that viruses can be “self generating” via the actions of harmonics and the right mixture of ingredients in the soup. More complex organism remains another question. If RNA or DNA can be generated naturally, it still doesn’t explain the complexity of even a bacteria. that’s mean every theory remains open until confirmed or proven otherwise. Everyone, scientist including base their research on an assumption, assumption based on the faith they have in their perception. Thus faith is not the opposite of a scientific approach. It is actually it’s basis (saint Augustin is a very good example of this)
The more we break down matter, the more we realize that matter isn’t what it seems to be. Many researchers and scientist played with harmonics and that with simple frequency, we can achieve a lot : destroying a bridge is the most famous example. Kill cancerous cells etc.
I think it is very interesting that many beliefs, monotheist, polytheist, synchretic, animist all start the same way : describing a genesis by sound / verb / songs whatever. Thus, this verb, this sound is the origin of potentiality because as soon as there is sound, there is movement, and where there is movement, there is potential. Our elders already mentioned this concept many times, from Platon, Socrates to the aborigine of Australia with their Kookabura song.
As for Hell, it is paved with good intentions, it’s not against you, but it just really irritates me that morons preaching love, peace etc are just so quick to condemn you to hell. What happened to the “Do not judge if you do not want to be judge” ?
Further more we could discuss the concept of second death / hell (very interesting to me) but that is another topic.
So in the end, i don’t reject any theories because in truth, we don’t know. the show mus t go on !
You’ve cleared up nothing, Ô Nanarchiste Bourré, because when you say…
“religious idiots will just imply that the “holy” books are scientific proof”
… you definitely seem to have something against faith. But why so defensive? I’m not selling faith, in fact it’d be hard work to care less about what you believe, i’m all about what can be proven via the scientific method.
There is compelling evidence for intelligent design and carbon dating is demonstrably unreliable, as has been shown, and if all you get from this is knowing that grandiose claims to knowledge aren’t always what they seem then that will suffice.
Too cryptic? Try this – Claims of millions, or billions, of years are akin to reading tea leaves and claims to a missing link crumble under scrutiny.
Other than that, Ô Nanarchiste Bourré, your attempted defense was little more than opinion and that comes across as odd considering you’re so open minded and all. I supported my central premise with a link to an opinion piece that itself linked to the supporting scientific papers and all i get in return is some whimpering about how carbon dating is still wonderful.
Personally i think you’ve confused avoiding conflict with being open minded which is easy enough to do given they look the same on the surface. I think it’s high time you got down off the fence and start taking a stand one way or the other.
You conclude by circling back to what you have against faith, rail at so called christians even though you’ve noticed i’m not that type of moron, incorrectly paraphrase Scripture and in the end reject the very facts put in front of you here.
@Mayhem,
Na, I’m just trying to explain a perception and engage in a dialectic with an open synthesis.
I’m not afraid of conflict quite the contrary but I don’t see why I should provoke them.
Concerning faith, my critics are not only concerning Christians but all faith in the since that they function on dogma. Dogma is submission and submission limits potential in most cases (because not all progress is factually progress).
In the end, all I’m trying to say is that we are free to chose what we believe in but not to impose those beliefs on others as I was told when a being a kid “it’s for your own good” or “you don’t have a choice” or “you should feel guilty” or “you will go to hell”.
Or a manual on how to crush “being”
The links are interesting and the question of ID remains open. On the hypothesis that it is in fact true, the second question would be “by whom or by what ?”.
Dating methods are good tools even if imperfect (there is no denying, i though I was quite clear in the previous post, my bad).
And yes, everything I write is, of course, my opinion (because based on my perception). Maybe I should have just said that I have no certitudes. It would have been shorter.
As for taking a stand, sometimes it is better to do nothing than act and make a mistake. Plus there is no reason on taking a stand on such a topic because like I said “in truth, we don’t know”
cheers and thanks for your time !
Recycling your main point has worn me out, Ô Nanarchiste Bourré, and i have no idea how i could be ramming anything down your throat given how little i care about your spirituality.
My only concern was your contention that Evolution could be made to fit with the Creation account which, you went on to argue, shouldn’t be taken literally in the first place. You might think the Bible contradicts itself or that modern science has moved beyond it but i’m here to tell you that neither criticism holds sway when the evidence is diligently and honestly appraised.
Just so long as you know that you are choosing to put your faith in demonstrably flawed, assumption based, theoretical science (carbon dating) over and above what was observed with the naked eye (lava cooling) in which case i’ll leave you with your comforts.
What i am forced to accept is your defensive stance being a barrier in your pursuit of truth. And before you deny the accusation please explain your straw-man construction where you misrepresented my advice “to make your mind up” for “doing an act or something”. That you read between my lines and change my intended meaning tells me you’re reaching just to stay in this conversation.
Darwin’s theories fall completely apart at the cellular and molecular levels, and Darwin could not account for the origin of life.
There is compelling evidence for Intelligent Design.
I can show you something really cool if you want to see.
I’m always up for it !
As Mayhem has pointed out, yes, irreducible complexity is the real skeleton on exhibition here now, the bones of Intelligent Design.
I’m a bit short on time right now so forgive me for borrowing from a comment I had already written in the recent past..
“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could
not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications,
my theory would absolutely break down.” – Charles Darwin
Yeah, back in his day, and seemingly continuing to this day, there was a distinct limit to knowledge of Cellular Biology.. they just didn’t have the apparatus with which to conduct any meaningful exploration into the complexities of the cellular world.
And a few other worlds as well..
However, some stunning advancements have been made that have reshaped theories within the scientific disciplines, and within the four Cats –
Natural sciences
Formal sciences
Social sciences
Applied sciences
It is the advancement (new knowledge) that has served as creator of Intelligent Design Theory. Not agenda driven religious dogma.
The birthing of the ID theory brought together a number of people, quite qualified in their respective science fields, in a 1993 meeting that included:
Dean H. Kenyon – Evolutionary Biologist, Michael S. Behe – Biochemist, Steven C. Meyers – Geophysicist… among others, All of whom had become adherents to ID Theory.. and with good reason –
Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection, while chugging along it’s rails as a well respected train of thought, and that endeavored to explain all life as an evolutionary process, hit an obstruction and comes to a screeching halt at the cellular, and molecular levels.
That’s the break down.
Through Dr. Behe, came “irreducible complexity”, and as defined by Behe –
“By irreducibly complex I mean a single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly (that is, by continuously improving the initial function, which continues to work by the same mechanism) by slight, successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional.”
This immediately describes the molecular machinery of the Bacterial Flagellum.. an actual, functioning, gear fed shaft driven biological motor comprising a dazzling array of integrated parts of molecular machinery, all of which are necessary for the functioning of the motor. It is quite literally a biological machine. Machines require an assembly “blue print” for each of the parts to be integrated.
Here we approach the essence of the ghost in the machine –
Information.
But in an effort to dismiss Behe’s theory of irreducible complexity, came Co Option Theory.. and yet, a true knowledge of the mechanics of the Flagellum destroys that argument, in that, the errant theory does not allow for the development of unique parts, such as evident within the Flagellum. UNIQUE. “never existed before” parts.
Parts which, according to Natural Selection, must have “Functional Advantage”. The looming problem then, is how all these unique parts can exist, where the machine as a whole CANNOT function without any one of the parts. Without a Function, there is no need for parts and Natural Selection eliminates the unnecessary.
For anyone who would like to see a graphically beautiful explanation of the Flagellum Machine, check out the following vid @ 16:00 – (give it a few minutes..)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
yowza that’s cool. the video itself was brought to my attention by our good friend and brother, Clucker a while back so a big thanks to Cluck for this.
But we want to get to the subject of Origin.. and the necessity of Information. This was Dean Kenyon’s big stumbling block, who co-wrote “Biochemical Predestination”.
THIS was the book that attempted to prove that first life could have originated as a successful blending of simple chemicals…
THE book that convinced the science world that a “designer” was not needed to produce first life. But what does Kenyon say now??
“OOPS”. “I was wrong”.
He realized this because he could not refute a challenge to his theory – If
“information” is absolutely necessary for the construct of any life form – as in, DNA.
Natural Selection CANNOT account for the origin of information, genetic material..
So, Kenyon, father of the muck theory, failed, reassessed.. became an advocate of Intelligent Design.
I would encourage everyone to view the linked video in full.. trust me, it’s very cool..
@Rain : thanks for taking the time to show/explain all this. I will watch the video when I get back home. It’s quite refreshing to have another perspective out of “believe it or go to hell” logic.
On a similar yet not the same topic, have you seen the experiment of the pr. Montagnier concerning the memory of water ?
I only know a documentary in french, he admitted himself that without his nobel prize he would never had the guts to challenge this theory.
And yet, he proved that water has a memory and that it is possible to reconstruct DNA from scratch with simple magnets, pure water.
wow, you know, I came across this recently also, and I’ve been meaning to look into it.. kinda forgot about it though, even though it seems really interesting.
Thanks for the reminder! Now i really have to get moving out of here but I’ll check it out later this evening and get back to you…
again, thanks!
SMITHSONIAN~ established by the National Academy of Sciences …..made up of the “Scientific Lazzaroni”…..Theological Philosophers of St Lazarus……
it has the same IHS “Aurelian”/ Jesuit SUN logo with radiant arms…..
the same rising sun on Washington’s Chair…
# Science in the New World was Monitored/Controlled/Theorized by the VATICAN from the very get go…..their version pushed by Emeritus Priests/Professors…..
The Greek “Gigantes” is your Biblical Giants (King Og, sons of Anak)….the Cyclop myth to explain who built the Giant Stone Temples of the Gods in Baalbek & Egypt and their larger than the others size depicted in stone images ….
# I am a GIANT to a man in Bali, an American Basketballer is a GIANT to me….but pre-biblical temples have many standard(todays) 7ft doorways, covered in a megalithic lintel…
Yeah?? Bull!
world news daily report, eh… From the disclaimer on their own website:
WNDR assumes however all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any persons, living, dead, or undead is purely a miracle.
WNDR is SATIRE.. Fiction.
try again.
The Smithsonian, NASA, and Our ‘race-baiting’ ‘cop-hating’ (AP)+ ‘left-stream’ Media and many religious organizations .. nothing but total lies to fit their ‘bias’ criteria and financial gains.
Might as well scrap your history books and cancel your subscriptions.
We don’t necessarily like to pay people to lie to Us ( example: AP-Associalist Press-NY & LA Times- USA Today- TIME- People- RollingStone- “O”- Esquire- .. (on & on !!) but with NASA ..We don’t have a choice.
GET THE RELIGIOUS NUTS OFF THIS SERVER!
98 percent of the bin readers would be in nut houses if that happened…
Hulk smash, original Vikings or Nephilim
too bad americans and the world can never trust the smithsonian and other institutions. they have been stealing and transplanting since day one. these are money laundering institutions used to funnel stolen artifacts from nations after being pilfered by the european elite. thieves. rewriters of history. who is that family in italy who is known for their wealth in artifacts? how did they get them?
there are three frauds on this earth, first the legal system, second the political system, third the religious system, the religious system being the dumbest.
Charlie, You hit it out of the park, but there is one more, the money system, the Slave debt money.
There are many secrets of the aliens, but few of us are ready for them! Once you read all these messages from the aliens, you will never be the same again!
http://www.blue-planet-project.com/Conversation-With-Aliens-Alien-Messages.html
The Giants are the aliens. Their disembodied Spirits are the demons who possess the unfaithful,unbelievers and atheists. Witches and Warlocks seek these Spirits for knowledge and guidance while performing inhumane rituals to sacrifice to these Spirits in exchange for powers and favors. The Truth is in front of our eyes, it just hasn’t been interpreted correctly by most of the brainwashed public,who believe the lies and seek not for the Truth. The hard hearted and hard headed will never know the Truth.
I can not find a single credible source for this, but about 7 debunks… you do the math. Find me the source, show me the proof!
It never ceases to amaze me that folks like (Nanarchiste BORE) will always refer to anybody who doesn’t believe what they believe, a religious idiot. Let’s take a look at Nanarchiste’s statements for a moment, shall we?
1. Nan stated that he/she could not figure out why the Smithsonian would hide giant skeletons, except that maybe they are afraid of religious idiots, when in fact, if they allow the many skeletons to be seen and/or added to mainstream science, it would prove all the more that the bible is indeed historically correct.
2. He/she talks of “hard science”, when EVERY piece of science out there regarding ROUND earth is controlled by NASA. You won’t find anything to support it, except a few CGI’s and some supposed documented footage of astroNOTS outside the ISS with earth in the background…only…why are there bubbles rising around them? Because they are filming underwater at the practice facility, not in space. The only person blocking your thought evolution is YOU.
3. You speak of fringe science, and sound off about these religious idiots and Flat Earthers pulling their info from alternative sites, and you actually stated that they are never published through the “respected media”. I actually laughed…Why are you here? Go back to the respected media sites and spout your stupid shit there. Oh, I forgot, the respected media never talk about this kinda stuff.
4. I offer a challenge to you and any other moron who constantly speaks out against biblical belief and/or Flat Earth. Go and find, by whatever means you can, one ounce of proof that Darwinism is more than a useless theory. And find one scientific fact that the earth is round. The only rule on the round earth theory is this…you cannot use anything provided by NASA. No pictures from NASA, and no documentation from NASA. They are polluted, compartmentalized, and untrustworthy. Good luck to you…and while we are waiting, why don’t you look at one or two of the many videos of people filming live footage of structures, cities, coastlines, etc. from 50-100 miles away. How is that possible on a round earth? I mean, we are using the Pygathorean formula for measuring curvature (endorsed by NASA), so…
I am glad you are amazed
So allow me to answer :
1- bible was originally written in greek / arramean. then translated to latin, and then all other languages depending very often on the interpretation of the translator (hence all the different schisms). that simple fact should bring anybody to take this book with caution. furthermore the bible was never meant to explain laws of nature but to show a path and the “saving of souls”, all of them.
2- He, I’m a he. I know it can be confusing today
never saw bubbles coming from spacesuits except when in a swimming pool. Plus on a re-breather system, there is no bubble even in water. I mean come on…
3- yes, read my prose more carefully, and you will actually realize that on this point, we are not so far apart. that’s also why I surf on website like this (with of course the pleasure of meeting people like you)
4- I don’t speak against biblical belief, because well, I don’t give a fudge. I am no one to tell people what to believe in. However, I despise when some bigots try to enforce their belief on me whether religious, spiritual or politic. Read again what I wrote on Darwinism.
I’ve posted already enough basic experiments to flat earthers here and there on bin to show that earth is round. I traveled around the earth and I didn’t fall off, and I saw it from very high above (even though not from space but I wish). So yeah, it’s round. Up to you to prove it to me. As for the 50-100 miles away, it is possible in many cases, depending on how high you are, the refraction level of the atmosphere etc. You flat earth is limited, your universe is bounded and small. If God is infinite potential and that you are such a believer, how the hell can you have such a limited god ? Can a god with so little potential really be called a god ?
cheers to you !
More flat brain BS
