| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Oath Keepers Kicked Out Of Ferguson And Threatened With Arrest
Monday, December 1, 2014 8:59
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Oath Keepers in Ferguson were kicked off the rooftops where they had positioned themselves to help protect private businesses. The armed men have reportedly been threatened with arrest for their activities.
Ferguson private businesses, at least 12 of them, burnt entirely to the ground in the wake of the Darren Wilson decision in the Michael Brown shooting case. Although the Oath Keepers are now gone from the rooftops, they are remaining in the St. Louis suburb to protest the riots and looting.
Click here to read the rest of the Oath Keepers in Ferguson story.
“threatened to arrest group members for acting as a security service without a license [permission from the STATE]”
comical, isn’t it?
Haven’t the POLICY officers and their mighty ones proven many times over that they cannot tell the difference between their friends and their foes?
disgraceful. cowardly cops, whoever agreed to tell them to leave. shame on them. the ones high in power need the little guys to carry out their dirty work, and there seems to be no short supply of cowards who work against their fellow man.
People need to ignore these corporate employees.
Governments Have Descended to the Level
of
Mere Private Corporations
Supreme Court Building
Clearfield Doctrine
Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-
371 1942
Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v.
United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: “Governments descend to the level of a mere
private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where
private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is
concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as
entities entirely separate from government.”
What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by
corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
different than a mere private corporation.
As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private
corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific
performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government,
like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other
commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific
performance are made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial
agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called
statutes.
This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED
STATES CORPORATIOON COMPANY filed its “CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION” in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER
the ‘corporate government’ agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the
FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use
today.
References:
(i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-
company.pdf
(ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94)
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-
work-by-judge-dale.pdf
[4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they
are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private
corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to
conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You
bet they do!
6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate
or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS,
which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of
Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did
you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes?
For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued
for violating their corporate regulations?
[8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
(iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/