Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
SWAT members approach a home during the search for suspects of the Boston Marathon bombings.
Cheryl Cumley / WND
The Third Amendment, which guards against the quartering of soldiers in citizens’ homes – and which came into being because of the abuse of British troops against American patriots – has just been dinged by a judge who ruled the provision doesn’t apply to police.
In essence, that means police on official business could claim the legal right to bust into a private citizen’s home and occupy it.
The determination from federal district court Judge Andrew Gordon was rendered when he dismissed a Third Amendment claim from a Henderson, Nevada, family who suffered that very fate.
Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson and several police agents in federal court for a July 2011 incident they described in court papers.
Volokh reported: “On the morning of July 10, 2011, officers from the Henderson Police Department responded to a domestic violence call at a neighbor’s residence. … [Police] told [Mitchell] police needed to occupy his home in order to gain a ‘tactical advantage’ against the occupant of the neighboring house. Anthony Mitchell told the officer that he did not want to become involved and that he did not want police to enter his residence.”
Police went to the Mitchell family house anyway, and “banged forcefully on the door and loudly commanded Anthony Mitchell to open the door to his residence,” his complaint read.
Mitchell then reportedly contacted his mother to let her know what was going on – and police “smashed open” his door with a metal ram, court documents indicated.
From there, the situation grew even more chaotic. Mitchell wrote in court papers police pepperballed him and his dog, gave him conflicting orders and ultimately arrested him. He was released the next day from jail.
But Mitchell and his parents turned around and sued, alleging their Third and Fourth Amendment rights had been violated – the Third, because the police were acting like members of the military. The case was closely watched by legal minds, given the unusual nature of the Third Amendment alleged violation.
Read more at WND:
http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/cops-can-storm-homes-court-suggests/
/protests-demonstrations/2015/03/martial-law-a-citizens-handbook-2455546.html
Your local Police Officers ARE YOUR #1 government enforcers who will force you and your community at the point of their weapons to comply with them, but this story gives you specific info how to stop them. Read and you will see how to stop them, and no, they will not be getting military backup as everyone is brainwashed into thinking…
Judge recall! Protest!! Protest!! On his front lawn! Protest!!!
Domestics are notoriously dangerous calls. Without more facts this article just seems to inciteing more anti-government sentiment. Not that the gov needs any help there. What I find weird is that people don’t seem to realize the gov declared war on the citizens when it declare corporations as people!!
@Anonymous said, “Domestics are notoriously dangerous calls. Without more facts this article just seems to inciteing more anti-government sentiment….”
Your response suggests you don’t accurately understand the situation.
The home the public employees broke into was NOT the scene of the ‘domestic’ disturbance for which they were called, and the police knew that they were forcing themselves upon a totally uninvolved family and their property. To be clear, it also was not a case of mistaken address.
The ‘domestic’ event was at, and only at, a neighbor’s house across the street. You can also research more details on this story from prior articles in other websites/media.
I would hope this changes your opinion…