| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
Dirty Foreclosure Mill Attorneys Fabricate a Death Threat by Investigative Law Journalist
Sunday, November 22, 2015 12:52
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: Defamation Complaint and Bar Complaint per Rule 3.3 as Judge Lasnik Observes Racism and Affirms the First Amendment Against Cenlar FSB Attorneys Luke Wozniak and Renee Parker of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP.
As noted in last year’s journal entry and video (seen above) about Lucero v. Cenlar, 2013-0602 Luke Wozniak, Joseph McIntosh and Heid Buck Morrison are a bunch of abusive attorneys. But today’s move sets the bar for an all time low, watch for a video by morning. Here is today’s email to Judge Lasnik and all attorneys involved, the Bar Complaint and Lawsuit are coming with the quickness. Nobody gets away clean with this sort of lawlessness against me, No Sir.
Dear Judge Lasnik:
It was great to enjoy our brief salutation this afternoon during recess. I think you know darn well that I am not violent, nor did I issue a death threat or you would have acted on it sua sponte.
As such, and as I noted to Attorney Wozniak at recess, I am filing a Rule 3.3 Candor to Tribunal Complaint against Attorneys Wozniak and Parker, as well as a Complaint Sounding in Defamation. These attorneys, sinking to the bottom of the barrel, have done exactly what American Tower Corp tried — and failed — to do fifteen years ago as I settled my lawsuit and reported them to the DOL on behalf of my trainees, when that $290K settlement was reached. In this instance, we are going to have an absolute immunity vs. First Amendment battle for years to come.
As I told Attorney Wozniak on soon-to-be-seen video, nobody sustains a credible death threat for weeks without calling the police or FBI.
This statement about an intent to commit a crime of moral turpitude was false, issued with reckless disregard for the Truth, and published in a public federal court with the only intent being to prevent me from running video outside the courthouse, which you properly allowed.
For her part, Attorney Parker even lacked the dignity to address me on video.
Aslo: I am most definitely independent of Ha Dao and her associates, and the prior Restraining Order obtained by Attorney Heidi Buck Morrison was AGREED upon — another fact that Counsel for Cenlar failed to note in this morning’s Defamatory statements. Also what was agreed upon at that Deposition last year was that I was allowed to run video, until they reneged and immediately threatened to call the police. It’s all in the video.
Lastly: My parents taught me not to suffer fools and abusive people gladly, and this is no exception. I certainly don’t mean to disrupt your Courtroom Your Honor but I believe that the Counsel for Defendants provided the true interruption by making up an issue that simply did not exist, or you would have taken action yourself. You made it clear what you expect in your courtroom from me when you told me to shut up, but honestly that wasn’t even necessary because I operate as a professional and have never been ejected from a courtroom in hundreds of appearances. I will say what I need to say, when I want to say it, and how I want to say it, subject to reasonable time place and manner restrictions of course.
That is a certain Inalienable Right the last time I checked and I will not surrender it under any circumstance at any time, and that includes any aspersions cast regarding bogus death threats.
Respectfully submitted,
CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
