Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Oregon Progressive Party (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

OPP Urges NO on the Corporate Takeover of Portland’s Water and Sewer System

Thursday, April 3, 2014 7:45
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Oregon Progressive Party urges NO on the Corporate Takeover
of Portland’s Water and Sewer System

For 27 years, I have been in the forefront of creating new electric and water cooperatives and public districts in Oregon.  I oppose this measure.

This measure is a corporate takeover of the City’s water and sewer systems, under a misleading cloak of populist rhetoric.

This measure would graft onto the Portland water and sewer systems a 7-person board of directors, elected with unlimited campaign contributions and expenditures.  I would expect the big commercial and industrial water users to select their candidates and overwhelm the voters with political ads.

So far their effort has been funded 99.4% by big corporate water users and water polluters and their lawyers.  See http://tinyurl.com/waterdistbackers.

The measure would prohibit nearly anyone with Portland water or sewer experience from serving on the board, clearing the field for the big money candidates.

The resulting corporate-dominated board would have less concern for the environment and residential ratepayers.  Portland's overall progressive voters ensure that the Portland City Council, which now controls the system, has a generally pro-environment, pro-consumer outlook.

But a board elected from gerrymandered districts, solely on the basis of  water and sewer issues and without limits on political spending, would likely:

  1. gut expenditures necessary for environmental protection, and
     
  2. increase rates for residential customers in order to decrease rates for the largest customers.

The attorney for the measure backers is John DiLorenzo, who for decades has led the charge in challenging campaign finance reform laws.

There are some policy statements in the measure, like very vague (and unenforceable) prohibitions on “regionalization” (not defined) and on regulations allowing greater harm to Bull Run Watershed.  But the measure leaves out protecting the environmental regulations governing all other parts of the water and sewer system.

Dan Meek

progparty.org          [email protected]



Source: http://www.progparty.org/noonwatertakeover

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.