Online:
Visits:
Stories:

By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Free Speech Internet Will Soon Disappear – DO NOT BE FOOLED!!!!

Saturday, February 7, 2015 21:18

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

HOW DOES THAT OLD SAYING GO AGAIN?

OH YES; THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT!

There are PLENTY of things a person might find if they look up Barack Obama in the dictionary, but HISTORIAN is not one of them. Most of what you’d find are not family friendly words, or they are items or terms that most descent folk don’t talk about with much frequency… HOWEVER, you can rest assured, HISTORIAN WILL NOT be there. Now that I think about it, maybe it’s just my dictionary with all those nasty words, but i digress. Obama seems determined to relive EVERY mistake humanity has already made in the past. Why? Because what Obama is selling in exchange for votes and ultimately his power is FAR easier to sell to voters than REALITY! Absolutely EVERYTHING with Obama is politics. I know, I know, you’re going to tell me, “but the themselves sticker says, ‘Obama Cares.’“ Guess what? ANOTHER LIE!

While we’re talking about the dictionary, let’s talk about the Holy Bible for liberals: the THESAURUS! Since Liberals, or Progressives, or whatever it is they are calling themselves these days are all INCAPABLE of telling the truth, in its place liberals they make ABSURD promise after ABSURD promise. Ordinarily, anyone with an IQ over 6 can discern the nonsense for the TOTAL FICTION that it is, however requiring IQ’s over 6 eliminates almost all of Obama’s base. Any spark of independent thought that MIGHT sneak in and question if what they were just told to think made sense is quickly stomped out by the state run lapdog media, who merely parrot whatever the democrats say.

Since we don’t have actual “journalists” anymore, and “journalistic integrity” is as alive and well as the T-Rex, the IQ under 6 crowd never has a clue they are being duped. Liberals and Democrats will continue saying things that most 3rd graders know don’t make sense, but as long as the media stands right behind liberals and cheers them on, liberals keep getting elected, and keep getting away with their bullshi**.

THEN, WHEN THE IQ UNDER 6 CROWD FINALLY CATCHES ON…

HAVE NO FEAR… THE THESAURUSES ARE HERE!

After a quick name change, the USEFUL IDIOTS go right back to towing the party line… the same line I might add that their OWN party is wrapping around their necks to hang them with. Do I really need to go into details? Blacks are at RECORD HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT and POVERTY, yet blacks by and large still love Barry O. Sadly, what they don’t realize is that their savior Barry O, and the rest of the democrats, keep pushing socialist policies with their pretty names, all the while making absolutely CERTAIN that the poor STAY poor, and that they STAY controlled… just how liberals like it. Don’t blacks ever wonder why Martin Luther King was a Republican? H-E-L-L-O! Don’t get me wrong, I realize the GOP has just as many big spending progressives as the liberals, but I don’t call myself a Republican. I call myself a CONSERVATIVE! That gives me e license to hate minorities, gays, Muslims, old people… I’M KIDDING, I’M KIDDING! I must have thought I was Harry Reid for a second talking about Conservatives.

ANYWAY…

For anyone out there who is old enough to remember the “Fairness Doctrine,” do you remember anything “Fair” about it? What about the “Affordable Care Act?” How many people have you talked to that have “Saved” money? ANYONE? No, not the urban legend we’ve all heard about who has somehow ‘saved’ money… I want a NAME! Who can you NAME that has saved money? That’s what i thought. Then there’s the “Dodd/Frank Financial Reform” Bill? The only thing that bill “Reformed” was taking the Bill of Rights and throwing it away. See a pattern here?

DO ME A FAVOR: PLEASE HAVE AN IQ OVER 6…

THERE IS NOTHING NEUTRAL OR FAIR ABOUT NET NEUTRALITY!

LEARN FROM HISTORY!

THESE ARE THE COLD HARD FACTS:

5/23 – DINGY HARRY AND THE SENATE TRY TO TAKE AWAY THE FIRST AMENDMENT:

“Reid, and those Democrats who support violating the Constitution’s limit on Congress making laws curtailing the First Amendment’s provision of free speech, say that government should decide “who can spend money in elections and how much they are allowed to spend.” Not surprisingly, this would apply to the average American, candidates, special interest and pressure groups. Of course, everyone can believe the Democrats would make the law equally binding to all.

Didn’t the Democrats pass Obamacare without one single Republican vote and without even reading the bill? Wasn’t their mantra, “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it,” blasted all over the airwaves by none other than California Democrat Nancy Pelosi? Would anyone dare buy into the altruism being peddled to limit an individual’s God-given right to freedom of speech?”

9/20: – DIANE FEINSTEIN, CHUCK SCHUMER, & DICK DURBIN TRY TO LIMIT WHO HAS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS:

“Advancing their quest for “common sense press control,” the Senate Judiciary Committee voted yesterday to define who the government will consider to be an “Authorized Journalist,” meaning if the measure becomes law, they will also be able to declare who is not. Voting 13-5 on “a compromise worked out by Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer, Dianne Feinstein and Dick Durbin in coordination with news organizations … the overall bill will … would codify many of the regulations proposed earlier this year by Attorney General Eric Holder,” Fox News reported.”

9/16: DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE PUSH A BILL TO CRIMINALIZE DISSENT OF THE GOVERNMENT!

“Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. Dissent is the lowest form of crime. If you are a drone in the hive of the Left, it is possible — easy, in fact — to believe both of those things at the same time.

Free speech just won an important victory in a federal courtroom, though it is shameful that the case ever even had to go to court. Ohio had enacted a plainly unconstitutional law that empowered a government panel to determine whether criticisms offered in political advertisements were sufficiently true to be permitted in the public discourse. Those who have followed the IRS scandal, the Travis County, Texas, prosecutorial scandals, or Harry Reid’s recent effort to repeal the First Amendment will not be surprised that this measure was used as a political weapon against a conservative group, in this case the anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony List. SBA List criticized a Democratic House member for having voted for the so-called Affordable Care Act (ACA), noting that the law will implicate American taxpayers in the funding of abortions, an entanglement previously minimized through measures such as the Hyde Amendment. Despite the fact that the ACA regime would, among other things, permit federal subsidies for abortion-funding insurance plans, the Ohio Inquisition ruled the ad impermissible, and banned it.”

SO MUCH FOR FREE SPEECH!

10/26: DINGY HARRY AND HIS BAND OF COMMUNISTS TRY TO REGULATE “CONSERVATIVE WEBSITES”

IN DECEMBER AND JANUARY OBAMA SIGNED THREE BILLS TAKING AWAY THE FIRST AMENDMENT!

In recent months there have even been instances of VETERANS WHO SERVED IN IRAQ BEING ARRESTED, AND PUT INTO MENTAL WARDS FOR MAKING FUN OF OBAMA ON THEIR FACEBOOK PAGES. Even an ICON IN NEWS MEDIA GETS BLASTED BY HIS HIGHNESS’S ASS OBAMA!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

In 2010, when this whole issue of Net Neutrality first began to take hold, Fox News Reported the following:

“Before the FCC decided to pursue Net neutrality protections, Fox News Channel’s Glenn Beck warned his audience that the government was trying to take over the media. Beck later said Net neutrality would” — we always get stuck here — “‘wildly affect your life and free speech’ by forcing a ‘Marxist utopia’ on the Internet.”

WHAT A WILD COINCIDENCE!

“Tell Glenn Beck that maybe Marxist utopia might work better than the corporate bull that we have now.” Who said they’d start saying that? Oh, I remember. That sure has — that has been the case wherever Marxism has been tried. It’s much, much better than what’s happening here in America.

Brian adds: “Before FCC decided to pursue Net neutrality protections, Fox News Channel’s Glenn Beck warned his audience that the government was trying to take over the media. Beck later said Net neutrality would ‘wildly affect your life and free speech’ by forcing a ‘Marxist utopia’ on the Internet. Send this sicko to the funny farm, preferably in another country because he sure as hell isn’t American.”

You know there is nothing more American than deporting people who disagree with you. Right, Brian? Oh Thomas Jefferson must be so proud right now. Apparently, great Marxist minds think alike.

Thank goodness Free Press is out there, right here, with the president. It’s great. Trying to curb the influence of special interest on the Internet.

Now, if you happen to have an opposing view, there is a Web site for you. I’m not going write the first paragraph for you, but I understand somebody does help you through the first part. Here is the Web site: NoInternetTakeover.com.

NoInternetTakeover.com.

TELL EVERYONE!

The most commonly heard argument heard today: “Is it fair that someone who doesn’t even subscribe to or use Netflix should pay more for broadband in order to support it?”

EXCUSE ME!!!!!!!

Are these the same people saying that those who are younger and in good health should pay more to support the older generation and those in poorer health?

WHICH IS IT?

IT’S WHATEVER THEY WANT, IF IT SUITS THEIR AGENDA!

“THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS,”

AS LONG AS THE AGENDA IS THE LIBERAL AGENDA!

LIBERALS: CAN YOU BE CONSISTENT JUST ONCE?

JUST ONCE?

For those who want to demonize Glenn Beck and call him a nut, let me point to a long list of issues Glenn was called a loon on, and he turned out to be SPOT ON. Anyone who has followed Glenn Beck for any length of time, read his books, or watched his show when it was on, ought to know better than to make such idiotic comments. Anyone else is in engaging in “contempt prior to investigation” which is probably the single most effective way to show total, complete, utter ignorance on your knowledge (or lack of) in a subject area.

HERE ARE JUST A FEW ISSUES GLENN HAS BEEN MADE FUN OF FOR, YET WAS DEAD RIGHT ON:

We will have universal healthcare 07-26-2007
Death panels (agrees with Palin) – 08-10-09
Health care will cause financial reset – 3-18-10
NEA is putting out Obama propaganda – 9/1/2009
There will be riots in the CA streets – 02/17/10
Yosi Sargent resigns – 9/24/09
Shirley Sherrod is right – 7/20/10
Eric Massa story is a waste of time – 3/9/2010
Van jones is a 9/11 truther – 9/4/2009
Van Jones resigns – 9/6/2009
Acorn is an organization full of fraud & corruption – November 7, 2006
Acorn will go underground – 6/18/09
Chicago Climate Exchange CCX is Crime INC- 4/26/10
Cash for Clunkers warning (cars.gov) – 7/31/09
Congress will become irrelevant – June 30, 2009
Auto Industry will collapse 7/26/07
Economy is smoke & mirrors – 8/16/07
Debunk FEMA camps myth 3-26-09
We will monetize the debt – 01/05/10
Net Neutrality will neuter the internet – 12/02/09
Cass Sunstein is most dangerous man in U.S. – Dec. 7, 2009
Anita Dunn is a Mao lover – Oct. 15, 2009
Food prices will inflate – April 21, 2008

To see all the evidence, click here.

“NET NEUTRALITY” IS ABOUT AS “NEUTRAL” AS THE “AFFORDABLE” CARE ACT IS “AFFORDABLE!”

GOVERNMENT CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO REGULATE THE INTERNET! PERIOD!

As the old saying goes, “The more things change, the more they stay the same.” When it comes out collective Internet freedom as it relates to our First Amendment rights, truer words have never been spoken.

Why We Have “Old Sayings”

A culture develops old sayings about life, because over time, they old sayings are generally true and have withstood the test of time. When it comes to Internet freedom, there are two more old sayings that apply: (1) “If it ain’t broken, don’t fix it; and, (2) “Inch by inch it is a cinch”.

“If It Ain’t Broken, Don’t Fix It”

There is no need for the government to change access and content rules on the Internet. Therefore, the government must INVENT REASONS to gain CONTROL over our FREE SPEECH on the Internet, and when they engage in this type of intrusiveness, they usually do this “in the name of protecting the children”. Thus, the Federal government will invent reasons why the Internet is broken and must be fixed. These new arguments to intrude on Internet freedom and free speech, are, and will continue to center on child pornography. The problem with this argument is that all States already have very strict pornography laws. For example, in Arizona, if a person views online child pornography, the criminal penalty is10 years in prison for each separate image that is viewed by the accused. Arizona residents do not need the intrusiveness of the Federal government to come into play in order to protects its citizens from Internet pornography. In short, the Internet “ain’t broken and it does not need fixin’.”

“Inch by Inch, It Is a Cinch”

Through the power of incrementalism, the Federal government is well on its way to seizing total control over the Internet. It is abundantly clear, that the Federal government’s goal is total control over the content on the Internet as well as regulating who has access to this expansive medium of communication.

The Great Firewall of China

China’s Internet police censors are very well-trained and very quick to respond to any content that could potentially pose a potential challenge to the Chinese Communist Party’s political, social and ideological control. China’s Internet police have made China’s Internet the envy of political pro-state propaganda, censorship and government control over commercial activity.

On December 2, 2014, the 7th China-U.S. Internet Industry Forum attracted 150 participants, including Lu Wei, Minister of the State Internet Information Office in China. Wei manages (i.e. rigidly controls) Internet information in China. Also attending the conference was the United States Under Secretary for economic growth, energy and the environment, Catherine Novelli.

In the keynote speech of the conference, Minister Lu made several suggestions, including that China and the U.S. could and should jointly manage the Internet. I will pause for a moment as you rub your eyes in disbelief and reread the previous passage.

Yes, the Chinese and the Americans are actively planning to jointly control the Internet.

President Obama may not be able, or willing, to protect our Southern border from illegal intrusion, but he is certainly on his way to sealing off the borders of Internet freedom.

The two countries vowed to strengthen cooperation (i.e. extreme censorship) on fighting terrorism in cyber space in the latest excuse for Federal government intrusion into our Internet freedoms.

When In Rome, Do As the Romans Do

In classic Orwellian Doublespeak, Under-Secretary Novelli stated that the two countries share a mutual responsibility to build up more broadband access, particularly in the developing world. As the reader will see in later paragraphs, this will be the excuse to tax the Internet. She described this process as being inextricably linked to GDP growth. This twisted logic suggests that economic growth is contingent upon controlling the Internet and its content as well as who has access to the Internet. In China, one increasingly needs an ID to log on to the Internet and the content rules are actually more strictly enforced than Facebook protecting its turf.

Meanwhile at George Washington University (GWU), Minister Lu has been brought to this American university to share stories about the vibrant Chinese Internet industry in Beijing’s Zhongguancun, known as China’s Silicon Valley. While speaking at GWU, Lu invited his American student audience to visit China’s Internet firms there and mingle with the Chinese in order to gain a glimpse of America’s Internet future.

The Secretary General of the Information Research Center of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Jiang Qiping, said the U.S. has been insisting the other countries be completely open in cyberspace, but that would bring huge Internet security concerns. Subsequently, the Chinese are telling Americans that we must protect you from yourself. Secretary General, Qiping should rest easy because America is ready to control the Internet in the same manner as happens in China.

The FCC Plans to “Go Chinese” On Internet Freedom

When government is afraid to outright ban something, they are notorious for taxing the activity into oblivion, so as to deny access to a product or service. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), without any legitimate statutory authority whatsoever, is proposing to expand its taxation and regulation of the Internet.

According to the Constitution, all taxes must be passed by Congress. However, nobody ever accused this administration of following the rules of the Constitution (i.e. Benghazi, IRS-Gate, Fast and Furious, intimidation of AP reporters, etc.).

Dictatorial regimes have used the Internet to squash oppositional political thought and to spy on citizens (e.g. NSA). Further, it is well-known that the United Nations views the Internet as an untapped opportunity for tax revenues and an opportunity to regulate popular political ideals (e.g. Agenda 21).

Three Months Ago, the FCC Was Reviewing Archival Documents to Find the Right Mix of Controlling the Internet

Any American who values their present state of Internet Freedom would be wise to review what the FCC was looking at in terms of changing Internet content and access regulations. The following document was leaked to me as to what the FCC was previously looking at when they were meeting outside the purview of public scrutiny. Take the 5-10 minutes necessary to view this 2012 document, under review by the FCC, in order to see just how close we all are to losing our Internet freedom.

COUNCIL WORKING GROUP

TO PREPARE FOR THE 2012 WORLD

CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS

I have also received information, from an anonymous whistleblower which stated that the FCC was also reviewing an old Senate bill originally introduced which would have given complete control over the internet to Verizon Wireless, A T & T, Bell South and more. And the FCC was also looking at a former bill introduced by the scourge of Arizona, Senator John McCain, in which he proposed that bloggers be fined up to $300,000 for “offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards”.

If the FCC had passed any of this legislation, it would have marked the end of previously unrestrained opinions as expressed on the Internet. McCain’s Internet army of censors would then pass the information on to the relevant police authorities and subsequent bloggers could be fined $300,000 or face jail time. Hiding behind the pretense of protecting our children, McCain’s legislation was originally referred to as the “Stop the Online Exploitation of Our Children Act.” The legislation demands that a Stalinist-type army of informants, similar to the abovementioned Chinese Internet police, would patrol the internet and remove content which it deemed a threat to the established order.the proposed administrative laws, would have had the Internet spies browsing various websites, like a pack of Facebook trolls, looking for inappropriate internet material which might pose a threat “to the children”.

On the surface, there appears to be good news for Internet freedom advocates. After playing host to protestors in his personal driveway, FCC Director, Tom Wheeler, has backed off consideration for all proposals which in any way, would restrict free access to the Internet and the right to exercise free speech. Before you plan your celebration party, please be aware that the FCC is leaving the door open to imposing an indirect tax upon Internet users. Taxation is a precursor step towards control.

FCC to Use Subterfuge to Control the Internet

On one hand, the FCC seems poised to protect Internet freedom after flirting with rules of extreme censorship only a few months ago. Then, after a few driveway protestors show up, the FCC reverses themselves. However, this is a case of a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”. The FCC is avoiding controversy by changing its tactics.

The FCC has reserved the right to “extract funds from Internet providers to help subsidize services for rural Americans, educators and the poor…” Internet providers won’t be asked to contribute to the subsidy fund, known as Universal Service, right away. The keyword here is “right away“. This will be the first step that the FCC will take to tax the Internet.

Remember, “Inch by inch, it is a cinch”. If we allow the FCC to unconstitutionally tax the internet, this will be the first step towards exercising unfettered control over the Internet. I also view this as a precursor move to hand over taxation, and ultimately Internet control to the United Nations.

Conclusion

American government and university officials are in bed with the Chinese Internet censors, ostensibly, to learn about how best to limit Internet free speech, Chinese style.

The FCC originally showed its true colors as it strongly considered fining bloggers for free speech on the Internet, according to insider sources. Further, this government is showing its intentions as it is moving toward joint control over the internet with China. And what will the net effect be? The march towards waking up the country as to the march towards absolute totalitarian control will move forward, unimpeded, as the people eventually lose their right to exercise free speech.

The silver lining in all of this, is that Internet freedom is something that even most of the sheep value. If we in the Independent media play our cards right, we can use this issue to our advantage. Roll up your sleeves awake citizens of America, we have some work to do.

Read the article at the Common Sense Show here:

THE VOICE OF REASON

WEBSITE: http://thelastgreatstand.com/
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/LastGreatStand
GOOGLE PLUS: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LastGreatStand
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/#!/LastGreatStand
TEA PARTY COMMUNITY: https://www.teapartycommunity.com/profile-151600/
PATRIOT ACTION: http://patriotaction.net/members/TheVoiceofReason
YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/user/LastGreatStand/
SEEN.IS: https://www.seen.is/members/home
RIGHT.IS: http://right.is/contributor/pages/351/169/bio.html

TRYING TO SILENCE THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS NOTHING NEW FOR OBAMA:

FOR MORE ON FACEBOOK’S SHADY DEALINGS:

FOR MORE ON LIBERALISM: THE IDEOLOGY OF HATE AND GENOCIDE:

BE SURE TO CHECK OUT THE GIFT SHOP!

Comments

Total 1 comment

The Watcher

Obama, the Muslim Kenyan, with his Michael wife, is ineligible to be President, and has an invalid Social Security Number.

Obama, the Hagmann’s, Steve Quayle, Alex Jones, Lisa Haven, ‘Cry Baby’ David Wilcock, and Benjamin Fulford should all be sent to the FEMA CAMPS for FINAL PROCESSING.

President Hillary Clinton in 2016 and 2020! Unless Sarah Palin runs, then I will vote for her! She’s A LOT better looking than Hillary!

ALRIGHT! Got all of this in before I got wacked off!

Feb 8, 2015, 2:04 pm 0 Reply

Newsletter

Email this story