| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
ASSAULT ON AMERICA: Obama Killed the Oil Pipeline, Seized the Internet and Cut off Ammo In Just ONE WEEK!
WHEN WILL IT BEGIN?
WHEN WILL HE DEMAND WE ADDRESS HIM AS ‘OBAMA THE GREAT?’
WHEN WILL HE BEGIN ERECTING STATUES OF HIMSELF?
World History (but not world history written by liberals here in America) will show Obama to be one of the greatest villains of all time. HE USURPED THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, used his unlawful power as President to act completely unchecked by ANYONE during his tenure in office, and will bring America to its knees. There will be entire VOLUMES of the damage Obama has done, yet still, the modern day version of Sodom and Gomorrah (The United States) goes right along as if nothing is wrong. I am still baffled at how many people claim to KNOW that our country is circling the drain, yet they go right about their merry little lives like it’s, “all going to be ok.”
PEOPLE: IT IS NOT GOING TO BE OK?
GOT IT?
Either people are TRULY as dumb as lamp posts here in the United States, and they TRULY are oblivious to what is happening right in front of them, OR they are the laziest and most selfish people to ever walk this planet as they follow a complete traitor right off a cliff. In the event you happen to MISS the GIANT link down the bottom:
OBAMA ACCUSED OF “MEDDLING” IN SWEEPING NEW INTERNET REGULATIONS
OF COURSE HE IS!
PEOPLE STILL HAVE NO IDEA WHAT NET NEUTRALITY REALLY IS!
One would THINK after we elected someone NOT FIT FOR THE OVAL OFFICE because as a nation we were TOO LAZY to vet the candidate first, that we might have learned a lesson. NOPE. One would THINK after after we learned about all of Obama’s MEDDLING in the affairs of the IRS, and how HORRIBLY that turned out, that we might have learned a lesson there. NOPE. One would THINK after how bad the country got SCREWED with Obamacare, and all the shady backroom deals that went on to pass that bill that Obama has ILLEGALLY and UNILATERALLY changed 19 TIMES, that we might have learned as lesson from THAT. NOPE. One would THINK after the President of the United States was named LIAR OF THE YEAR with the whole routine about, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor,” that maybe THEN we might have FINALLY learned a lesson. NOPE.
When two of the most reputable polling agencies in the country tell us that overwhelmingly AMERICANS BELIEVE OBAMA IS INCOMPETENT, DISHONEST, AND UNTRUSTWORTHY and the TWO WORDS USED MOST TO DESCRIBE OBAMA WHEN REFERRING TO HIM ARE “LIAR” & “INCOMPETENT, that we might have learned from THAT. STILL, NOTHING. One would THINK after DEMOCRATS IN HIS OWN PARTY BEGAN CALLING OBAMA “FLAT FOOTED,” “DETACHED,” AND “INCOMPETENT,” that we might have learned SOMETHING for heavens sake. NOPE. Still, here we sit, not one iota wiser than the day he took office. Forget the KEYSTONE PIPELINE AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT ASSAULT, the Internet is going to be NOTHING like we’ve know it. IF, IF, I said IF Obama’s changes are SO good, then WHY has the FCC chair REFUSED to even tell CONGRESS when CALLED before them.
WHAT?!?!?!?
CALLING THE MOST TRANSPARENT ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY!!!
CALLING CAPTAIN TRANSPARENCY!
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page
As I said in a previous post related to Net Neutrality:
I’m sorry, did I read that correctly? The FCC Chairman REFUSES to come before Congress? If there is nothing to hide, and this is all about “FAIR SPEEDS AND RATES FOR NETFLIX USERS,” then what is there to hide?
HINT: THE WHOLE BILL!
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NEUTRALITY!
I have made a REALLY big deal on my Facebook and Twitter pages about “NET NEUTRALITY” for a long time… and as per usual… I’ve been ignored for a long time… and as per usual I was right AGAIN. If you are reading this, then CLEARLY you care enough about the future of this nation to spend 5 minutes READING something that is not contained solely within a headline, sound bite, or a picture to be shared a million times on Facebook. However, that also means that since you are in the overwhelming MINORITY by actually READING, the responsibility lies on YOU to TELL every person you know the TRUTH, and SHARE this information EVERYWHERE you can including YOUR Facebook and Twitter pages.
This country is EVAPORATING right before our eyes, and if past performance is any Indication of the future, then you might want to start telling everyone you know about many of the other topics myself and other members of the alternative media have been SCREAMING about for a few years in some cases. So far, most of us are battling what? 1000? Take that as a hint the media is LYING TO YOU!
REFUSES to testify? What would happen if you or I REFUSED to testify when called before Congress? Not only does he refuse to come before Congress, he REFUSES to release what they are doing… ARE YOU KIDDING?
Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page
WIKIPEDIA DEFINES CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS AS:
“Contempt of Congress is the act of obstructing the work of the United States Congress or one of its committees. Historically, the bribery of a senator or representative was considered contempt of Congress. In modern times, contempt of Congress has generally applied to the refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommittee—usually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of documents.”
The CRIMINAL OFFENSE of “contempt of Congress” sets the penalty at NOT LESS THAN ONE MONTH AND NO MORE THAN ONE YEAR IN JAIL, and a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000.
ADD THAT TO THE LIST OF LAWS OBAMA IS IGNORING!
OBAMA DICTATED INTERNET TAKEOVER TO THE FCC – AND NOW THE CHAIRMAN REFUSES TO TESTIFY OR ANSWER QUESTIONS!
THIS IS HOW THIRD-WORLD DICTATORSHIPS OPERATE!
Sword-At-The-Ready reports:
After the shellacking the Democrat party was handed this past November, His Heinous Barrack Hussein Obama goes to the FCC – an ‘independent’ agency and hands them SECRET PLANS HE DEMANDS THEY IMPLEMENT in order to NATIONALIZE (COUGH, SOCIALIZE, COUGH) and TAKE OVER the internet. Under the FALSE GUISE of ‘net neutrality’ two Republicans on the committee blew the whistle and warned that this is ‘ObamaCare for the internet’ – intended to ultimately restrict content and access to news and information.
WRITTEN IN SECRET (REMIND YOU OF ANYTHING?) AND PASSED INTO “LAW” BEFORE ANY OF US KNOW WHAT “RULES” WILL BE IMPOSED – THIS IS EXACTLY HOW A DICTATORSHIP OPERATES!
AND AMERICA DOES LITTLE MORE THAN WHIMPER!
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page
The Republicans run like sissies from daring to confront and stop this lawlessness. When they ordered FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to testify before a Congressional oversight committee today, BEFORE the takeover tomorrow, Wheeler defiantly refused to do so – and the Republicans on the committee were indignant enough to simply state without emotion that they are “deeply disappointed”.
“Deeply disappointed”????? HOW ABOUT GETTING THE SERGEANT-AT ARMS TO MAKE AN ARREST FOR CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS? How about the House and Senate demand hearings before the FCC is allowed to make ‘law”? How about the House DE-FUND the FCC entirely until they comply with the demand that they let the American people study these Obama-drafted plans before they make them policy????
But no – the GOP is a surrender-monkey party that is more content to go along with the dictatorship because they think they will keep a seat at Obama’s table than stand up to oppose unconstitutional and lawless dictatorial decrees that strip up of our liberties. The most we will get is a shrug of the shoulder and a sigh of “disappointed” from the lips of a completely neutered and totally complicit Republican party.
THE PERMISSIBLE AND FREE INTERNET AS WE KNEW IT…
IS GONE ONCE THE NEW RULES BEGIN!
G-O-N-E!!!!!
You will not feel it right away, but in time the pain will become perhaps more pronounced than your health care costs. Keep watching your bill go up in the coming months as the ISP giants repackage their services to comply with these new secret plans and maximize their income in other ways. If you read or write blogs like this one – in a year – it is possible they will no longer exist due to FEC campaign laws being applied to any political discourse. The federal Beast will then run and control the totality of the internet, limiting access, content and speed, while the cost will skyrocket beyond the reach of most, and all the so-called opposition party can muster is ‘deeply disappointed’????
WE ARE SO SCREWED!
ON OUR OWN, UNABLE TO RESIST AND DEFY TYRANNY!
IT’S WELL PAST LOCK AND LOAD TIME!
NET NEUTRALITY:
WHAT IT REALLY MEANS, AND HOW IT COULD IMPACT YOU
What I am about to say really should not come as any great shock, but unless you’ve taken the time to look into it, you could very easily be duped by the RIDICULOUSLY MISLEADING name the progressives have come up with. The author of the article says EXACTLY what I was thinking when I heard of “Net Neutrality,” and why shouldn’t he or I think it… except for the fact that it presumes Obama and Co. are being honest. Duh. What were we thinking on that one? The author writes:
“When I first heard people talking about Obama’s attempt to push the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ”keep the internet free and open“ I thought, well, that sounds good to me. Last Monday, in his plea for the implementation of rules for net neutrality, Obama used terms like ”fairness” and ”freedom.” He expressed the need for more government control to ensure equal Internet access for everyone.”
For being duped by the “Net Neutrality” name, shame on me. I should know better. In my defense, Obama and this administration have SO MANY lies going, and SO MANY scandals, it is impossible to be on point and see through the ALL the nonsense ALL the time. It’s mentally taxing to have to look beyond the surface of what is said and figure out what is REALLY going on with EVERYTHING that comes out of the sociopath’s mouth. Unfortunately, to know what’s going on you simply MUST do that or Obama is going to dupe you. PERIOD.
HOW DO YOU KNOW IF OBAMA IS LYING?
HIS LIPS ARE MOVING!
I’ll let the author speak about the nuances of “Net Neutrality” in the article below, however I do want to say a few more things. First, as a general rule of thumb, if a bill or idea comes from the Democrats, and it has a name that makes it difficult to say you oppose it just on the merits of the name alone: BEWARE! For example: “The Affordable Care Act” has been ANYTHING BUT affordable, the “Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” did EVERYTHING BUT reform and protect consumers, and true to form: “Net Neutrality” does EVERYTHING BUT maintain free speech and keep the Internet “neutral.”
Democrats come up with these CRAZY NAMES to try to catch Republicans in “GOTCHA MOMENTS.” Consider this: pick any reporter from any of the Obama loving media outlets, and ask yourself if they are more likely to ask about the MERITS of a bill, or to ask, “Are you for or against the Affordable Care Act?” TRAPPED! Who would allow the media to get THAT sound bite? What is a Republican supposed to say? “Uh, yes, I am in total opposition to the ‘Affordable Care Act’ because… [CUT].” You don’t ACTUALLY think the liberal media is going to give enough time to explain that the bill’s name is misleading DO YOU?
THINK ABOUT IT: Why would the President who SIGNED A BILL “IN SECRET” MAKING FREE SPEECH ILLEGAL, or who SIGNED A BILL THAT COULD LAND A PERSON JAIL TIME FOR PROTESTING, want anything close to free speech and “Neutrality” to prevail on the Internet? Why would the same party that SOUGHT TO ALTER THE FIRST AMENDMENT’S FREE SPEECH PROTECTION all of a sudden be FOR free speech? Liberals like Senator Feinstein were going as far as to TRY TO REMOVE BLOGGERS RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH so the Communists in D.C. could better control the narrative they WANT people to hear, instead of the TRUTH. Thankfully, THE DEMOCRATS’ ATTEMPTS TO CHANGE THE FIRST AMENDMENT FAILED.
IN AN EMPIRE OF LIES, TRUTH IS THE ENEMY!
Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page
In the video included in, DHS INSIDER SAYS THAT THAT OBAMA HAS GIVEN THE GREEN LIGHT TO RACE WARS, we are told Obama is reportedly ESPECIALLY irritated with alternative media (citizen journalism) on the Internet, because people are learning the TRUTH too fast, and ignoring the CRAP being spewed by the Obama loving media. We are told CISPA will be making a comeback soon too (naturally), so BE ON THE LOOKOUT!
TEAM OBAMA:
Freedom Outpost writes: Net neutrality. That sounds like a friendly term, like something we all would WANT, right?
When I first heard people talking about Obama’s attempt to push the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to “keep the internet free and open” I thought, well, that sounds good to me. Last Monday, in his plea for the implementation of rules for net neutrality, Obama used terms like “fairness” and “freedom.” He expressed the need for more government control to ensure equal Internet access for everyone.
And he said that abandoning the principles of net neutrality “would threaten to end the Internet as we know it.”
But, as with everything else that interests me, I had to research it for myself. Whenever a politician (especially one who aggressively forces things like Obamacare) pushes for something, I think it is natural to have some level of skepticism.
So, for the last week, I have been heavily researching this so-called “net neutrality” to find out what it is all about, and why so many support it.
In reality, “net neutrality” is as confusing as its name.
There are two pieces to this that need to be identified and explained before we go further. One is the term “net neutrality” and other is “Title IIregulation.”
What IS net neutrality?
Here’s what Obama wants to you think it is:
“Net neutrality” has been built into the fabric of the Internet since its creation — but it is also a principle that we cannot take for granted. We cannot allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to restrict the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas. That is why today, I am asking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to answer the call of almost 4 million public comments, and implement the strongest possible rules to protect net neutrality.
Obama wants the FCC to ”create a new set of rules protecting net neutrality and ensuring that neither the cable company nor the phone company will be able to act as a gatekeeper, restricting what you can do or see online.” (Could it be that this is a way for the GOVERNMENT to restrict what we can do or see online? Read on to find out.)
Here are the rules he is recommending:
No blocking. If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it. That way, every player — not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP — gets a fair shot at your business.
No throttling. Nor should ISPs be able to intentionally slow down some content or speed up others — through a process often called “throttling” — based on the type of service or your ISP’s preferences.
Increased transparency. The connection between consumers and ISPs — the so-called “last mile” — is not the only place some sites might get special treatment. So, I am also asking the FCC to make full use of the transparency authorities the court recently upheld, and if necessary to apply net neutrality rules to points of interconnection between the ISP and the rest of the Internet.
No paid prioritization. Simply put: No service should be stuck in a “slow lane” because it does not pay a fee. That kind of gatekeeping would undermine the level playing field essential to the Internet’s growth. So, as I have before, I am asking for an explicit ban on paid prioritization and any other restriction that has a similar effect.
How does Obama want the FCC to do all of this?
His explanation, in his own words:
So the time has come for the FCC to recognize that broadband service is of the same importance and must carry the same obligations as so many of the other vital services do. To do that, I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act — while at the same time forbearing from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband services. This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies.
The “other vital services” Obama is referring to are public utilities like water and electricity. In other words, he wants the internet to be regulated the same way.
THAT “SOUNDS” LIKE OBAMA IS LOOKING OUT FOR AMERICA CITIZENS DOESN’T IT?
LET’S INVESTIGATE!
Back in June, Tom Woods talked to Berin Szoka about net neutrality and what it means.
Szoka is the president and founder of TechFreedom, a non-profit technology think tank in Washington, DC. Before founding TechFreedom, Berin was a Senior Fellow and the Director of the Center for Internet Freedom at The Progress & Freedom Foundation, and previously practiced Internet & communications law.
Please visit TechFreedom’s net neutrality myth-busting website Don’t Break the Net for a more detailed explanation of Title II and what reclassifying the internet would mean for consumers.
Here is Szoka’s interview with Woods.
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
Last week, the Cato Institute spoke with Szoka:
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
Is Obama exploiting the confusion over net neutrality in an attempt to push Draconian Title II regulation – and, ultimately, more taxes – upon citizens?
IT SURE SEEMS THAT WAY!
He is “MISREPRESENTING” [COUGH... LYING HIS ASS OFF] what ”net neutrality” actually is and what Title II regulations would actually do.
From TechFreedom’s November 10 media statement titled Obama Cynically Exploits Confusion over Title II, Misses Opportunity to Lead on Legislative Deal:
This morning, President Obama called on the FCC to “reclassify” broadband under Title II of the Communications Act so it can ban all paid prioritization. TechFreedom President Berin Szoka responded as follows:
Title II means the very opposite of net neutrality. Even under Title II, the FCC can’t legally ban all paid prioritization — only regulate it to make sure that prices are just and reasonable. In fact, Title II would authorize broadband providers to charge some price to content and service providers for carrying their traffic to users — and there’s no precedent for the FCC from “forbearing” from this requirement in a market that it claims is a “terminating access monopoly.” Title II would raise a host of other problems, including choking broadband competition, inviting regulation of the rest of the Internet and validating Russia and China’s push to have the International Telecommunications Union regulate the Internet as a telecom service.
Obama’s statement is simply a cynical political ploy, a way of playing to activists on the radical Left who have built mailing lists and a political movement on the most absolutist conception of net neutrality. Forbearance, the process by which many claim the FCC could make Title II palatable, will only be politicized even further by Obama’s inflammatory rhetoric.
This is simply the opening salvo of the legislative fight over net neutrality that has been brewing for nearly a decade. No-blocking and transparency rules are uncontroversial: back in 2006, 215 House Republicans voted for them as part of badly-overdue update to the Communications Act. The debate has always been about two questions. First, how to craft a non-discrimination rule that bans anti-competitive behavior — but doesn’t ultimately harm consumers? That means policing paid prioritization under flexible rules, not banning it. Second, how to prevent net neutrality from leading to larger regulation of the Internet? That means barring Title II, clarifying that Section 706 isn’t a grant of authority, and giving the FCC narrow authority to deal with truly harmful broadband practices.
A legislative deal is possible, but both the President and Congressional Republicans would have to get beyond sound bites and start talking substance. President Obama’s bizarre insistence that four million Americans supported Title II, when nearly a quarter of the comments filed with the FCC actually opposed Title II, doesn’t augur well for the negotiating process. A more pragmatic president would have used this opportunity to work with Republicans and the dozens of Congressional Democrats who’ve opposed Title II on a legislative deal — the way that Clinton and Gingrich resolved welfare reform and the key debates of their day.
If FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler does what Obama wants him to do, the repercussions to Americans will be quite unpleasant [CAN YOU IMAGINE?].
If broadband is reclassified as a Title II public utility, the FCC will soon start taxing it – at an estimated $87/year per broadband household.
And then, there’s this:
On September 18, 2014, President Obama signed House Joint Resolution 124, which includes provisions extending the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) through December 11. The Act was previously scheduled to expire November 1, 2014, and the extension gives Congress a chance to consider the ITFA’s long-term future during the lame-duck session after the midterm elections. (source)
Why is this significant? Steve Pociask, president of the American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research, explains:
Using existing state laws, these regulations would be free to tax Internet services as a regulated or public utility service. In addition, the Internet tax moratorium will end on December 11th, which will give state and local governments the right to levy Internet taxes on consumers. If common carrier taxes are any benchmark, we can expect Internet taxes on consumers to increase to a rate of 17 percent. Ironically, the increase in price would suppress consumer demand and block Internet access far beyond whatever “openness” could hope to be achieved by net neutrality. This would be regulatory mismanagement at its finest.
And what about privacy? Grant Babcock of Reason addressed this in his article Net Neutrality—and Obama’s Scheme for the Internet—Are Lousy Ideas:
We know, indisputably, thanks to the heroic disclosures by Edward Snowden and the tireless work of journalists like Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald, that the federal government is attempting to use the Internet to build a global Panopticon, capable of accessing everyone’s personal information at any time for any reason or no reason.
We also know that one way the government is trying to accomplish this is by securing the cooperation of private companies [SEE: JANUARY 2015: FACEBOOK’S NEW PRIVACY POLICY WILL REQUIRE YOU TO ALLOW PARTIES LIKE THE FBI, CIA, and NSA TO NOT ONLY ACCESS YOUR FACEBOOK ACCOUNT, BUT ALLOW THEM ACCESS TO YOUR COMPUTER OR PHONE TOO!]. You can attempt to thwart surveillance by using encryption—but encryption only protects data in transit. Once it’s received and decrypted, it’s an open book. If the government can compromise private data custodians, encryption loses a lot of its efficacy. This is exactly what happened to Google, which had its internal traffic bugged by the NSA.
Sometimes, instead of outright sabotage, the government pressures companies into turning over information about their customers. See, for example, the brave efforts of Ladar Levison, head of now-defunct secure email provider Lavabit, to protect his customers—including Edward Snowden—from the government’s prying eyes.
But not all tech companies have the spine of Lavabit. What we risk doing by ramping up the government’s regulatory authority over the Internet is to make it easier for the government to pressure ISPs, many of which are data custodians, to get what they want.
Babcock also points out that the government is not above using its ”‘legitimate regulatory’ authorities to bully private actors.” He references the heavily-regulated financial industry and the blackmailing of healthy banks into taking unwanted TARP money by Bernanke’s Federal Reserve. The government’s “Operation Choke Point” program, which puts pressure on banks to refuse to deal with people engaged in perfectly legal businesses the Obama administration, for one reason or another, doesn’t like, is another example.
THE BOTTOM LINE?
OBAMA’S “NET NEUTRALITY” IS NOT NEUTRAL…
AND IS NOT CONSUMER FRIENDLY!
NOT ONE BIT!
Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
WHO CAN BLAME OBAMA? REALLY?
NO ONE IN ALL GOVERNMENT HAS STEPPED UP TO THE TWERP!
NONE OF OUR MIGHTY GENERALS… NO ONE IN CONGRESS!
NOBODY!!!
OF COURSE HE KEEPS TAKING POWER!
Did you know that under HILLARY CLINTON, THE STATE DEPARTMENT DETERMINED that the SAFEST and CLEANEST way to transport the oil out of Canada with the LEAST amount of overall “Greenhouse Gases” would be TO BUILD THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE? Yeah, put THAT in your pipe and smoke it. Obama vetoed the bill out of SPITE because he’s an infantile ego-maniac!
Obama Vetoes Keystone XL Bill
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
President Obama on Tuesday vetoed legislation authorizing construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, rebuffing the new Republican-led Congress amid a furious battle over Homeland Security funding.
The veto — just the third of Obama’s presidency and his first of major legislation — was made in private and without fanfare, reflecting tensions in the Democratic Party over whether the controversial pipeline should be approved.
“Through this bill the United States Congress attempts to circumvent longstanding and proven processes for determining whether or not building and operating a cross-border pipeline serves the national interest,” Obama said in his veto statement. [READ OBAMA’S VETO STATEMENT.]
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/233651-obama-vetoes-keystone-xl
The War On Preppers: Obama Bans Ammo For The Most Popular Rifle In America
Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page
Because he can’t get Congress to approve the things that he wants to do, Barack Obama has apparently decided to rule by decree for the rest of his time in the White House. One of Obama’s latest moves is to try to ban some of the most popular ammunition for the most popular rifle in America. Previously, the Obama administration attempted unsuccessfully to ban the AR-15. That didn’t work, so now Obama is going after the ammunition. This is yet another example of the war on preppers that is going on all over the nation. Whether you are a gun owner or not, this assault on our constitutional rights should disturb you greatly. Barack Obama has promised to try to squeeze as much “change” as possible out of his last two years, and in the process he is “fundamentally transforming” America. But what will our country look like when he is done?
At the top of the Drudge Report today, there was a story from the Washington Examiner detailing this ammo ban…
As promised, President Obama is using executive actions to impose gun control on the nation, targeting the top-selling rifle in the country, the AR-15 style semi-automatic, with a ban on one of the most-used AR bullets by sportsmen and target shooters.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives this month revealed that it is proposing to put the ban on 5.56mm ammo on a fast track, immediately driving up the price of the bullets and prompting retailers, including the huge outdoors company Cabela’s, to urge sportsmen to urge Congress to stop the president.
And here is more on this ammo ban from the NRA…
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/war-preppers-obama-bans-ammo-popular-rifle-america
FCC Approves Sweeping Internet Regulation Plan, Obama Accused of MEDDLING!
At this point, everything is completely out of our control unless you are prepared to take it back physically.
Bottom line, theses SOB’s are losing the communist Marxist propaganda wAr they started.
Now is the time to prepare for the sucker punch which will involve a major false flag cyber attack on bnaking system.
Strange how BOA stood out from the recent Fed stress test?
They must hit the Internet kill switch in order to pull this off…
The sources above like Disinfowars is 40% truth and 60% lies, and no longer a reputable source for information.
See this for a better understanding about what the “US Government” and England are doing with ISIS and the rest of the Middle east.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzK3RCFoCn8
This propaganda piece needs to be recognized for the lying piece of dog squeeze it really is.
The only people that should be crying about Net Neutrality is the big telcom companies that have been ripping-off Americans for decades.
What Net Neutrality has done is put the power of Regulation back in the hands of the People where it belongs.
As i don’t know if I am responding to a consortium or what, i shall address you as this…Dude, you make a reference to polls,but consider this: your inclusion in any poll would immediately undermine that poll’s credibility and negate all of the farsicle data of it’s intended agenda. Instead of espousing your apocalyptic vision upon the non-worthy, even with the subtle colorful patriotic prose you employ, why don’t you retreat to your secluded hillside paradise,set up your fields of fire, train your dogs and women, count beans and ammo,trip wire,cam and drone till your heart is content, then sit in your bunker and just chill out,man. I mean, why bother?
Huh, I don’t think the internet was seized, why BIN is still allowed to spew its garbage.
jdp..equal access for everyone, mean I pay for them who can’t pay? or will they lower the rate to $5.00/mo so all can pay?