Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:


Saturday, April 11, 2015 8:57
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

By: Voice of Reason





When I first saw this article I about flipped out, because as you’re about to find out below, I’ve done my homework on Sandy Hook, and it’s all compiled in the post below. I took the best information I could find from lots of websites, and I put it all in one place so anyone looking into the incident could easily find the best information with as little work as possible. 

There are about five or six articles here as well as quite a few videos, and then there are all the links within the post as well. I challenge anyone to go through all the evidence, and tell me this was not a false flag staged shooting. To say otherwise is preposterous. However, 30-year-old Timothy Rogalski is not going to a mental ward for thinking Sandy Hook was a Hoax. He’s going to a mental ward because he kept calling an elementary school and leaving messages about it, (i.e. like Mikey from Swingers style – see below!)

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]


“False Flag” describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.


Operation Northwoods was a series of false flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy administration.The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.One part of Operation Northwoods was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”.


Filmmaker and Author William Brandon Shanley Launches Wave of Lawsuits for more than $1 TRILLION Against Big Media Over Sandy Hook Massacre Coverage

Here is Mr. Shanley’s Statement:

“After exhaustive research, the good news is that overwhelming evidence reveals that no children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago. For relief, I have filed lawsuits against the media in US District Court in New Haven for Fraud and Terrorism. Here is an example of our abundant evidence, Exhibit D: The Connecticut State Police dash cams record no evacuation of children from school at critical moments: — Smoking Gun evidence no children died at Sandy Hook.”

Attached is a photo staged by the Newtown Bee, a wider view of that action being staged on a different day that the emergency altogether, and a sampling of front pages that terrorized the world with the fake photo.

Sandy Hook Parking Lot 2

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

Mr. Shanley is the producer of The Made-for-TV Election starring Martin Sheen that analyzed media coverage in the tectonic Carter-Reagan election of 1980. He is also the author of books on quantum physics, including Alice and the Quantum Cat (2011).

Dr. James Fetzer, whose 35 articles on Sandy Hook for Veteran’s Today qualify him for the highest investigative journalism awards, and School Safety Consultant, Wolfgang Halbig, whose investigative expertise as a former Florida State Police officer, and loving attention as a former principal, makes this case’s particulars comprehensible to all, will be called as expert witnesses.

It is their scholarship and bravery that makes these Complaints possible for the shear breadth and scope and detail of evidence they have assembled. Hundreds of independent researchers have also made this day possible, and Mr. Shanley claims they will be tracked down and rewarded heartily for their bravery and mindfulness of America.

Mr. Shanley’s Complaint states, in part:

Defendants entered in a multi-year conspiracy, meeting in groups separately and together, to commit fraud and terrorism, i.e., to brainwash the public into thinking a lone gunman drill known as the “Sandy Hook Massacre” was real, when in fact it was a staged FEMA National Level Exercise Event that redirected government resources to terrorize the public. These crimes were undertaken with the intent of subverting the US Constitution and to affect national, state and local laws.  This fraud involved lying to the public, faking news, publishing one-sided news reports, censoring reality, suppressing facts, and deliberately skewing the news to shift public perceptions.

The true costs of this breach of integrity and trust to society are unfathomable. Instead of fulfilling their Constitutional Role as the People’s Surrogates and being honest brokers of information, the Plaintiff will show how the men and women who dominate the TV news industry in the United States broke laws, besmirched the First Amendment, their Constitutional role as government watchdogs, and forfeited the right to report the news, and thereby profit from news production and distribution. The sine qua non of journalism is the search for truth. Our Fourth Estate chose a different path. Punitive damages of one year’s annual revenue from each Defendant are being sought to establish a News Trust, that will free journalism and restore trust and integrity to our communications sources. A democracy cannot survive this tyranny over human consciousness.

The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion usd, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint.

Case Name:

Shanley v. Smith et al

Case Number:



William Brandon Shanley


Mass TV and wire service news media are being sued for 1 trillion usd, punitive damages.

Shanley v. O’Prey et al

Case Number:



William Brandon Shanley


A third lawsuit will be filed against Connecticut-based TV and print media soon.

A complete list of Defendants in this suit can be found below.

As Mr. Shanley is proceeding on a pro se en paupers basis, public support is welcome via PayPal to [email protected].


Sandy Hook FBI

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

For those who are interested in what took place at Sandy Hook, regardless of what you’ve heard, or what the media has reported, then you’ve come to the right place. 

There really is no way to TRULY understand it all in a 3 minute read, so if you’re looking for a 5 second way to prove me wrong, you best move along. Don’t waste my time sending me emails about how you knew this person, or so and so knew that person, because the simple fact of it all, is that whatever you are going to say to me, you and I both know are pure hearsay. You heard it somewhere else and I believe that you believe whatever you are going to say. 

Now, with that out of the way, let me say that if you were told any story other than the the one that what took place at Sandy Hook during the alleged shooting was anything other than a FEMA TRAINING EXERCISE, then you’ve been duped. The only way you will possibly believe that, is to go through the evidence, and it’s not all in this one post. I’m going to try to compile as much of the mot important evidence into this post so it’s all in one place, but there are hours of video, and plenty of verified and factually accurate reports that PROVE what we’ve been told is a lie. 

NOWHERE will that be more obvious than in a courtroom and through the discovery process, so I am curious to see how this case goes. My guess is it makes no difference to the Plaintiff if they win or lose. If I was a betting man, this is REALLY about using the courtroom as a venue to bring the truth to light. That’s pure speculation on my part, but there is no better forum to do it, so I bet I’m right. Now we just have to see if the plaintiff has standing to bring a case. Time will tell. What follows is my best attempt to sum up the evidence, but to REALLY grasp what happened, I suggest reading each link on Sandy Hook within. 




There are MOUNTAINS of evidence (that cannot be disputed, unlike hearsay) within this posting and the links that are provided within. Anyone who is too ignorant to examine the evidence laid at your feet in this post, but still thinks I, or anyone else who will see this page, value what you have to say on Sandy Hook are sorely mistaken. Those who would comments about what they THINK they know, before examining the evidence have the collective IQ of a wild pack of baboons, called a CONGRESS ironically enough, so do us all a favor and spare your comments if you won’t examine the evidence. 

Examine the arguments and the sources, then if you still somehow dispute the findings, explain what you take issue with, and what source backs up YOUR version. Look at the bottom of any of my posts and I provide a TON of sources. Saying, “That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard” IS IN FACT most likely the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard, and YOU are the one saying it. What? If you have no evidence, or no sources, and nothing but your “GUT FEELING,” or what someone else told you, you think you’re in a position to make judgment statements about what happened? 

Uh No. Shoo fly. You bother me. You know why people behave in such a manner? Two words:


“Because of the psychological principal, COGNITIVE DISSONANCE, no amount of direct or circumstantial proof would convince some people that the highest political position in the country has been compromised by a communist plot spanning several decades.” 

“The term cognitive dissonance refers to a person who has received information so shocking, so upsetting, that they CANNOT ADEQUATELY PROCESS that information and then instead denies the validity of the proof that anyone else can see. If you are one of the cognitive dissonance types, please allow me to ask you a few questions.”

Who was Obama’s basketball coach in high school? 

Who was Obama’s history teacher in high school? 

Why don’t we see interviews with his former professors, teachers, coaches, childhood friends and his first girl friend? 

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page


No one knows. What we DO know… is there is VOLUMES of evidence Obama wants to confiscate guns. Another thing we KNOW, is people are not going to give them up voluntarily. So, in a case like with Barack Obama, who gets caught telling 1 truth for every 10 lies he tells, everything suspicious has to be gone through with a fine tooth comb. EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED! Sadly, even in the face of ROCK SOLID EVIDENCE, the COGNITIVE DISSONANCE crowd still persists with their abject denials. To them, I say let’s judge a man by his actions, not his words. With respect to Obama and his “AGENDA,” thus far have his actions served to HELP or HURT America? Do his Presidential actions match up with those of a constitutional republic or his communist background?

I am not going to lie. I like being right when people have told me my tin foil hat is too tight. Here, not only was I right, I was SPOT ON! I’ve been posting around the clocks at times about the Sandy Hook Hoax. There was SO MUCH EVIDENCE in plain site to prove it was a farce, and I live hundreds of miles away. Imagine if this country had “journalists” that did their jobs. Someone local should have caught this RIGHT AWAYFirst, SEVERAL OF THE “DEAD CHILDREN” HAVE BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED OR VIDEOTAPED AFTER THEIR SUPPOSED DEATHS IN OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTRY.  Second, in the obituaries, one of the students had their name spelled wrong. Upon a little investigation, no death certificates were filed. With a little more investigation FAKE ACTORS turned up that were also at the alleged Aurora shooting, the Boston Bombing, AND Sandy Hook? 




[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

How is it that the same woman is caught giving testimony of the horror she witnessed at BOTH the Boston Bombing AND Sandy Hook? This woman JUST HAPPENED to be at BOTH events? She not only JUST HAPPENED to be at BOTH, she saw BOTH right up close enough to be a witness? This woman not only JUST HAPPENED to be at BOTH, she JUST HAPPENED to see everything at BOTH, and JUST HAPPENED  to be picked out of crowds of witnesses to chose from? Oh yes, and she JUST HAPPENED to be picked at BOTH EVENTS by two independent news stations as THE person they were going to interview? Wow. Some odds.


Actor 1

Actor 2


It’s nice that the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION CAME OUT NOW and said it was all a drill. That sure didn’t stop the lies, and all the feigned outrage to try to get our guns back then now did it? I have said in post, after post, after post, after post that these “tragedies” are all manufactured by Obama to get our guns, and when I have people have always asked about my tin foil hat. Is it getting through yet? How EVIL Obama is?



It’s not just Sandy Hook. Almost ALL of the school shootings have been trumped up by the media and team Obama. I go into that in a recent post titled: BOGUS SCHOOL SHOOTING “DATA” RELEASED BY EVERYTOWN/MOM’S DEMAND. That list of shootings is being circulated by as “LEGITIMATE.”

The truth of what happened is almost exactly as we “Conspiracy Folks” had long since figured out. The school was in fact COMPLETELY EMPTY on the day of the shooting. The victims were literally brought in. For a better understanding of all that, see my previous posts on this issue:





With the testimony that took place before the Newtown Board of Education, combined with what us “Conspiracy Folks” had long since figured out… it looks like the school was in fact COMPLETELY EMPTY on the day of the shooting. The victims were literally brought in. For a better understanding of all that, see my previous posts on this issue:


Understand something: Barack Obama will do ANYTHING or KILL ANYONE to get to our guns. I hope these videos below have your undivided attention along with the rest of the information provided. You might also want to check out: DEATHS CONNECTED TO THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE – TOO MANY TO COUNT OR BARACK TELLS THE BLACK CAUCUS NOT TO WORRY; HE’LL KEEP MARCHING ON GUN CONTROL!


Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page


On May 6, 2014, former state trooper Wolfgang Halbig (see “Sandy Hook massacre was a “contrived event,” says former state trooper Wolfgang Halbig”) and retired professor Jim Fetzer (who has written extensively about Sandy Hook for Veterans Today) were in town to confront the Newtown Board of Education about the alleged massacre of 20 students and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Halbig had traveled far, all the way from Florida. There were others who also had traveled long distances to attend the board meeting.



1. Wolfgang Halbig emphasized that he is a national school safety consultant and one of the first to donate money for the Sandy Hook tragedy, and that he had contacted the superintendent and other officials with questions, but received not even one response back, nor was even one document released despite Freedom of Information Act requests.


Halbig: “To this day, you have refused to answer phone calls, and you have refused to answer my FOI (Freedom of Information) requests. And you’re in public education…and you use the word ‘honesty’ in your presentation. Where’s the honesty in this room? No matter how tragic that event might have been, people in America deserve the truth…. The questions I ask are not offensive to any parent who lost a child that day. They’re not offensive to Connecticut state police. They’re not offensive to ANY ONE! They’re such simple questions! Why no trauma helicopters? Why would you not let paramedics or EMTs? These are your children and you won’t let paramedics and EMTs into the building? You got 27 children declared dead within 8 minutes? [Halbig meant 20 children and 6 adults] Who does this? … Ladies and gentlemen. You are the board members, you are the leaders of this community, you are the superintendent. Respond! You have a great secretary. But I sense that she’s afraid — she’s afraid to call me back. That should not be happening in any school district. We are not here to disrupt this meeting. We want the truth.”

Halbig then points out that the Newtown Board of Education say they’re teaching children about character, responsibility, and honesty, but by their actions, they’re “modeling” their lack of character, responsibility and honesty.


2. (Beg. at 3:55 mark) Jim Fetzer said that during his research into Sandy Hook, he discovered that the school had 626 students. Subtracting the 20 who were killed that day, that leaves 606 students in the school. “Where were they on the day of this event?” Assuming a school bus seats 50 students, that means there should have been at least 12 buses. “But we don’t have footage or report of these large number of buses evacuating the students.”

Fetzer then lists some other reasons why “some people are skeptical of this event”:

  • The final report from the state police does not include the names and ages or sex of any of the victims.
  • The Newtown clerk entered into secret arrangements with the state legislature to avoid releasing any death certificates.
  • The state attorney general fought against the release of 911 calls.
  • Those involved in dismantling the school [after the massacre because of asbestos infestation] were subjected to lifetime gag order.

Fetzer: “All of this suggests that there is something there to hide.” Fetzer asks why and how those 626 students could be allowed to inhabit a school that was a “toxic dump” known to be loaded with asbestos and other biohazards, so infested that it was completely torn down after the shooting.

(See “Was Sandy Hook Elementary School already abandoned before the massacre?”and “Workers tearing down Sandy Hook school sworn to confidentiality”)

3. A Gulf War veteran (dressed in a Paul Revere costume) from New York said that within days after the Sandy Hook shooting, Connecticut passed one of the most restrictive gun control laws. He said he’s not saying the shooting didn’t take place, but he wants proof.

4. A man from Infowars did not dispute that Adam Lanza had perpetrated the shooting. Instead he emphasized how law-abiding gun owners in Connecticut and elsewhere are being “penalized” because of Sandy Hook, and the importance of the Second Amendment to freedom and the American way of life.

5. (Beg. at the 10:54 mark) A bespectacled man, with white hair and beard, “Dave Williams from Carson City, Nevada,” spoke about Second Amendment rights and the questions that Wolfgang Halbig had raised. He said,“If there’s nothing to hide, the best thing to do is disclose information and there’s no suspicion that something is being hidden. I don’t understand why he’s [Halbig] gone 11 months with legitimate requests and has received nothing.”Then he reminds the board that in our “information age” of websites like American Free Press, Infowars, and Veterans Today, the board members can disclose information to these sites with confidentiality.

6. (Beg. at 12:25 mark) A man from Rhode Island said he’s noticed “8 dozen, if not more, inconsistencies” about Sandy Hook. As an example, he questioned why there was no triage — carts on the ground, ambulances — at SH school, which normally would be undertaken at mass trauma events. But the school was blocked: no one could get in or out. Then the man put the board members on notice: “We’re here for a reason. And this is not going away. Like Benghazi won’t go away for Obama, this is not gonna go away, until you guys investigate this for yourself, find out the truth, and we all find it out together.”

7. (Beg. at 15:12 mark) Another man, with a grey beard and baseball cap, from New York, made the point that making public perpetrator Adam Lanza’s visage “at the scene” of the Sandy Hook shooting does not affect the reputations of Connecticut state politicians or police. He said, “Simply show the perpetrator at the scene” and Lanza’s autopsy “to prove that he really existed, besides a hat and a shirt.” “Why leave all these questions in the air when you have something that’s clearly been photographed, clearly available, and should be made available to the public” and put to rest “a lot of the controversy.”


8. (Beg. at 16:16 mark) A dark-haired man, in a brown-and-tan striped sports shirt,from New Jersey, said he’d contacted several people about Sandy Hook — people who are good friends of his, in law enforcement (police departments and federal government) “who have experience analyzing evidence.” Dark-haired man said although he can’t share with the board what these people told him because they “would most likely lose their jobs,” what he can say is that according to what these people have shown him, “things do not add up.” “There are too many inconsistencies,” including images that have been altered, forensics, and police reports that don’t add up.

He said: “It’s getting to a point where more and more people in this country are realizing that there’s something wrong. I understand that there’s a lot of people who genuinely believe that more gun control is the answer. And when you genuinely believe in something, you reach a point where you’ll do anything to get to that objective. The end justifies the means. However, doing anything dishonest never ever justifies the means. And I will tell you that, if you receive orders that would be considered unlawful, YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.



9. A woman, Michelle Murphy from Houston, Texas, who ranted about how all mentally ill people, especially bi-polar (which she is), should not be judged by what “one deranged person,” Adam Lanza, had done.

10. A dark-haired man with a goatee identified himself as “Jim Fitzpatrick, a Newtown resident,” and said he was offended by the “circus” of conspiracy kooks (referring to Halbig, Fetzer, et al) attending the board meeting.

Note how polite Halbig, Fetzer, et al. were, only to be met with SILENCE and non-response from the board.

So Halbig, Fetzer, and the guy from Nevada, had traveled thousands of miles to attend this meeting, for nothing.

Halbig is right:

All the officials — school, town, state — will just continue to stonewall. The only way we can make them talk is if they’re sued in court.

H/t FOTM’s Gingercake

For all the posts FOTM has published on the Sandy Hook hoax, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page~Eowyn


Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

Expect continued “False Flag events designed to usher the a “New Police State” to “protect us.” I have posted ad nauseam about FEMA camps and the HIGHLY out of the ordinary military actions around the country. I have ZERO doubts about what is really happening, but for the nay sayers, I’d love to hear an explanation to explain the video shown below. NEWSFLASH: These are FALSE FLAGS by our own government designed for a gun grab!

“False Flag” describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.


Operation Northwoods was a series of false flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy administration.The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.One part of Operation Northwoods was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”.

APTOPIX Connecticut School Shooting


This is a story that makes me just want to shake the @#$% out of people sometimes for believing the never ending trail of total utter LIES, DECEIT, and CORRUPTION the Obama administration has perpetrated on the American people. I’ve said this many times before, that Obama and the liberal progressives like Queen Nancy and Dingy Harry who have been in power all these years LIVE by the notion that “THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.” There is absolutely no respect for the rule of law, the Constitution, or the will of the American people. NONE.

We are talking about a Party, and a President, who have operated in the SHADOWS since the day Obama took office. Back room deals, BRIBERY, THREATS, MYSTERIOUS DEATHS and CIRCUMVENTING THE CONSTITUTION have all become staples of Captain Transparency’s “Hope & Change.” With literally EVERY policy decision Obama and his merry band of Communists have made, the administration has LIED at will to the American people, largely because they COULD!!! Listen to Professor Gruber for a moment discussing Obamacare and the tactics used to DUPE the voters. 

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

How does the saying go? Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me? Many of us have been right about EVERYTHING we have said, much of it dating back to before His Royal Highness’s Ass took the throne… yet even now, while we are batting 1000 or close to it… people REFUSE to see what is right in front of them. Note what I said back in March in my post titled: SAME WITNESS (AN ACTOR) GIVES TV INTERVIEWS OF WHAT SHE WITNESSED AT SANDY HOOK AND THE BOSTON BOMBING??? 

So many point fingers and yell “Conspiracy Theorist” when many of us see through the government’s charades, but we are right in the long run FAR more than we are wrong. Even a former Congresswoman said the Boston Bombing was False Flag perpetrated by our OWN government, AND SEVERAL OF THE “ALLEGED DEAD” FROM SANDY HOOK HAVE BEEN SPOTTED ALIVE AND WELL…  

I remember personally looking at a family member over dinner the day of the Sandy Hook Shooting, and saying, “You watch, there will be a shooting EVERY DAY until there is a TOTALLY ANTI-GUN bill passed by both houses.” If you look back through the news, not all of them made major headlines, but there WAS a mass shooting, or thwarted mass shooting DAILY for about two weeks after that… right up until the time it became obvious that no MAJOR legislation was going to happen. 

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page


Expect continued “False Flag” events designed to usher the a “New Police State” to “protect us.” I have posted ad nauseam about FEMA camps and the HIGHLY out of the ordinary military actions around the country. I have ZERO doubts about what is really happening, but for the nay sayers, I’d love to hear an explanation to explain this video. 

NEWSFLASH: These are FALSE FLAGS by our own government designed for a gun grab!

Americans have gotten SO LAZY it is sickening. Hardly ANYONE does research these days to find out if they are being lied to or not. If you’ve followed my posts for a while, then you know that’ve I have said not only in my posts about Sandy Hook, but also in many of my posts about gun legislation (also listed at the end), that Obama will do ANYTHING or KILL ANYONE to get guns confiscated. If you don’t believe that, and neither this post, nor any of the other Sandy Hook posts listed at the end of this one convince you… WOW. Might I suggest viewing the Gruber video above again?!?!? 

In addition to MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS SAYING OBAMA EXHIBITS ANTISOCIAL AND NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDERS, everyone from the PENTAGON and INVESTORS.COM to CHILDHOOD FRIENDS have said Obama is lying sociopath. Fool you once, shame on him. Fool you twice, shame on YOU. “The Ends Justify the Means” mentality that is on FULL DISPLAY with Professor Gruber’s comments above are NOT an isolated incident. That sneaky “behind your back because it’s for your own good anyway” attitude is at the CORE of all things Obama. 



When viewed in connection with all the stories that have come out about MARTIAL LAW, THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, FEMA CAMPS, and so on… how is it possible people STILL do not see Obama for who is IS… but rather they choose to see him for who they WANT him to be? 



Now, consider the authors of the article below: Jim Fetzer with Dennis Cimino


Dennis Cimino was the Navy’s top EMI troubleshooter before he went to work for Raytheon in the 1980s. He is also the author of “Running out of time: Will the US attack the US again?” 


A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Sandy Hook Huddled

The absence of evidence that should be present and the presence of evidence that should be absent are keys to unraveling Sandy Hook. And the suppression of the new documentary, “We need to talk about Sandy Hook”, appears to be backfiring. Proof of fraud and fakery continues to mount, substantiating it was a drill and no children died.

Sandy Hook Collage

An interesting article comparing Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing was published by A.J. MacDonald, “Sandy Hook: Hoax or Truth?” He observed that, “The Boston bombing had everything Sandy Hook didn’t: video footage of the bombing, photos of the bombing, photos and videos of the wounded, and lots of blood.” But studies of the Boston bombing reveal the use of actors, fake blood and a staged sequence of events.

“The claim that Sandy Hook was a hoax”, he continues, “is founded upon the fact that we have no video of the shooter, no photos of the shooter, no video or photos of the victims, and no blood. And it seems to me that if lack of evidence is evidence of a hoax, then the Boston bombing isn’t a hoax. I’ve written on this subject before, and it boils down to epistemology, or answering the question: How do we know anything?”

But MacDonald only has it half-right: the absence of evidence counts as evidence only if the evidence that is absent should be present. And the presence of evidence only counts provided it is authentic rather than faked. When some evidence is on both sides, the challenge is to assess their respective weight on the basis of scientific principles of reasoning. Some cases, as we shall see, are easier to appraise than others.

Sandy Report

Remember. Given the legal principle, Fraud vitiates everything, if it is provably false in even one material respect, the official account has been thereby vitiated. That is untrue of attempted falsifications, however, since any number of them could turn out to be mistaken as long as others that remain are valid. And, for those who want a refresher of the dimensions of the hoax, see “Sandy Hook: Ten more proofs that vitiate the official account”. It didn’t happen.



Consider the DASHCAM footage of the Sandy Hook parking lot at the times and locations where, according to the official report by Danbury State’s Attorney, Stephen Sedensky, some 469 students (not to mention the 75 staff, teachers, custodians, administrators and such) should have been evacuated. When we look at the footage, we discover they aren’t there! And they aren’t there because no evacuation was taking place:

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

The claim is often made that you can’t prove a negative. But in this case, we just did: the DASHCAM footage shows that no evacuation was taking place. An even simpler case is the claim that there is an elephant in your living room. If you go to that location and find no indications of the presence of an elephant, you are entitled to infer there’s no elephant in your living room. And if there was no evacuation, it didn’t happen.



You might think that I have blundered by overlooking the “iconic” photograph by Shannon Hicks, which appears to show fifteen children being led away from the school by a police woman. This image made its way around the world and was published on virtually every front page of every newspaper in print. But we know now that there was a second photograph, also taken by Shannon Hicks, that gave the game away:

Sandy Hook Parking Lot 2

The public was taken in by Shannon’s first photograph, even though it was a cold day on 14 December 2012: the temperature was 28*F and there was frost on the ground. But no one paid attention to signs that it had to have been taken earlier in the year (taken as early as October). And had it not been for the discovery of her second photo, she might have gotten away with it:

Sandy Parking

Once the second photo emerged, however, the game was up: parents would not have been present in time for the emergency evacuation, where the road to the school was blocked at the firehouse; and they certainly would not have been standing with their arms folded had this been a bona fide shooting. In this case, we have the presence of evidence that should not be present at all.



Those who have been following the case will appreciate how many times there is an absence of evidence that should be present (such as the missing oil stains in the Sandy Hook parking lot) and the presence of evidence that should be absent (such as the neon sign, “Everyone must check in”), which has intrigued students of Sandy Hook virtually from the beginning. Here it is:

Sandy Hook Check In

Does anyone seriously believe that there would be a registration procedure at a school shooting massacre? What we have here is the presence of evidence that should be absent–like the Porta Potties, where Wolf has been refused information about who ordered them. And the reason appears to be that they were on the scene the day before, 13 December 2012, which, according to the manual that we have found covering this case, was only the drill to be presented as a live event the following day.  Consider this man’s performance:

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

New information has surfaced that Gene Rosen works for FEMA, which is stunning, because Sandy Hook appears to have been a FEMA Capstone Event. What you see here suggests that FEMA has a cadre of adult and child actors who are available for FEMA-managed events. One of the fascinating features of this video is that it shows Gene Rosen with children in Texas at FEMA events, where the same children later appear at the White House while President Barack Obama signs 23 executive orders to control ownership of guns.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page


A new documentary, drawing upon video studies by many students of Sandy Hook, “We need to talk about Sandy Hook”, has been taken down again and again, primarily, it appears, on the basis of fabricated copyright claims by one “Lenny Posner” (aka Leonard P. Osner), who has the parental integrity to produce a fake death certificate for his alleged son, Noah.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

A few days ago, I received an interesting critique of “We need to talk about Sandy Hook” from Dave Kraft, where his response, with regard to the performance of Gene Rosen, was comparable to that of other Sandy Hook skeptics. Here is what Dave had to say about the totality of the documentary, which is being taken down right and left and therefore must have compelling proof that it was a hoax:


Dear James,

The first couple of segments really struck me as Kryptonite to the Sandy Hook hoax. I thought it faded a little after that. The segments on the more technical aspects don’t really have as much impact. The one on Gene’s various versions of the story about kids showing up at his house is just a stab to the heart of the hoax. The footage of him walking around the fire house is just so damaging, especially the segments with the split screen with the two female interviewers and the correction of the cameraman. The look on the female interviewers’ faces is priceless. One of them looks like she can barely contain her contempt for Gene’s terrible acting.

To me the most compelling evidence is Wayne’s Carver’s press conference. Maybe the group thought too much had already been said about Wayne.

  1. Wayne Carver’s surreal antics is far and away my number one reason for not believing the official story
  2. The flanking cops reactions to Wayne’s performance and the video camera women in the background that is not operating her professional grade camera at the biggest news event of the decade!
  3. Paul Vance’s threats of prosecution for not buying his story; reminds me of the Holocaust deniers being put in prison.
  4. Governor’s shocking admission of advanced warning; even more telling was no reporter screaming “Who warned you, Governor????!!!!!!!!!!!!” I knew then it was not a real press conference.
  5. The non-grieving exhibited of all victims families, especially the sisters, brother and uncle of the teacher. You could see maybe the brother and uncle holding in the grief, but not both sisters too!
  6. The trail of money flowing like new wine at harvest time – out into the vanishing point of time. The fund raising by 911 victims’ families did not approach that of Sandy Hook – a much lesser event in scale and number of victims.
  7. Gene’s worst acting performance ever
  8. Missing evacuation of students reminds me of the four missing planes on 911 that were never reconstructed in hangers like they always do. They retrieved and reconstructed JFK Jr’s plane from the ocean floor.
  9. When George Stefanopolis and Anderson Cooper sat in directors chairs at the scene on TV, casually discussing mass murder like it was a prognostication of a college football game at Notre Dame. That completely blew my mind. It really cemented the idea the press was part of the scam like nothing else.
  10. The creation of the charity fund from the Lanza’s neighbor… that should have taken a few days. Where is his interview about knowing the Lanzas? Seems like they always interview the neighbors of mass murderers. How was he not relentlessly hounded for information? 
  11. Did he hear the gunshot that killed Lanza’s mother? Did he see Adam load weapons into the car and drive away? The idea the fund was planned before hand could be doubted… that’s the problem with all the technical segments. Too abstract compared to the press conferences of the main players… Carver, Vance and Gov. Malloy.


Rob Dew on is joined by two of the filmmakers behind the video, “We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook” from the group,, QK Ultra and Tyranny News, who talk about its viral success despite the ongoing, even fanatical, efforts to suppress it.  The video brings together ten students of Sandy Hook, each of whom contributed their own segment to the 2.5 hour-long production:

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Virtually on a daily basis, more and more revelations are coming forth, which continue to strengthen and reinforce the conclusion that Sandy Hook was a drill, that no children died and that it was done not only to promote a far-reaching gun-control agenda but to introduce a new billion-dollar industry of health care for school children, including drug therapy, which President Obama signed on 16 January 2013, only a month after the alleged massacre.

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page


The evidence they discuss includes that many web sites for donations to the families of the victims were up before the shooting occurred, which Dr. Eowyn has documented.  For additional stunning evidence that should not have been present prior to the alleged shooting, “Sandy Hook Deception: Associated Press stories & photos predate the massacre”. Which is one more especially striking way we know that it didn’t happen.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Here is the latest and best presentation by Wolfgang Halbig about Sandy Hook. This very patient review of the evidence presents one case after another of the presence of evidence that should be absent and of the absence of evidence–such as a surge of EMTs rushing into the building to get those little bodies off to local hospitals to be declared dead or alive and the missing Med-Evac helicopter–that should be absent. Test your Sandy Hook IQ by figuring out how many proofs we have that this was a hoax. Wolf is introduced at about 24:00.



by Dennis Cimino

When Sandy Hook first occurred back in the end of 2012, many of us who had done the research then began to see the inexorably linked events such as were Tucson and Aurora and for that matter the LAX staged shooting, the Dorner hoax, and the Boston PsyOpera hoaxes run under Project Longevity by Eric Holder, who has stated publicly that the American people ‘must be brainwashed’ about gun control. These hoaxes have been hastily but nonetheless deliberately cobbled together to control the way the people of the world think about gun ownership. Guns in the hands of the citizens, in any nation, have been and always were the last line of defense against despotic, rogue governments who’s sole purpose is to perpetuate (Project Longevity) the Rothschilds global financial hegemon.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

This is not just about U.S. gun control, but gun control globally, stifling resistance by all of those who seek to unshackle from debt slavery. In the grand scheme of things, the United States has been in financial collapse now for a long time. The writing was on the wall once the FED (aka the Rothschilds), decided that they could print money at whim, which in the process thereby began to bring about a global collapse of all currencies as other nation states run by their central banks followed suit to keep the bubble from bursting and ending the charade known as modern day “capitalism”, a euphemism for fiat money laundering by acquisition of hard assets like precious metals, gold and silver, through a global “switch out” of worthless paper known as the U.S. dollar.

The Rothschilds have long since mastered the technique of trading worthless paper for hard assets. They own virtually half if not more of the world’s wealth, largely accomplished by means of relentless central bank thievery. As the United States begins to disappear into the quantitative easing ‘hole’ the Rothschilds built to bury this country in, the risks to the counterfeiters is very great. As much of the world has begun to awaken to the role of central banks, which have stolen the wealth of the sheeple, the end game as some of us see it, it is entirely possible that the only major obstacle to the brutal enslavement and impoverishment of the world is the American people and their arsenal. The stakes could hardly be higher.

Read the article at DC Clothesline here:

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun.   The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”

- Mao Tze Tung, Nov 6, 1938

Gun Control

By Jim Fetzer (with Sofia Smallstorm and Paul Preston)

“I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag”--Paul Preston

Sofia Smallstorm, who produced and directed the documentary, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”, which many regard as the best video study of the Sandy Hook event, recently interviewed a Los Angeles school expert, Paul Preston, about Sandy Hook and his knowledge of what had transpired.

Governor Malloy had held a press conference that day, explaining that he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen, which raised the question, what “something like this” did he mean? Had he been told a school shooting massacre would take place? or a drill that would be presented as a real event, which appears to be what took place?

Remarkably, we now have confirmation from an unexpected source. Paul Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S. Department of Education of the Barack Obama administration, who confirmed to him on the basis of their own personal knowledge that:

(1) it had been a drill;

(2) no children had been killed; and,

(3) it had been done to promote an anti-gun agenda.

Given his background of 41 years in the California public school system (from custodian to district superintendent) and having served as a teacher, coach, vice-principal and principal before retiring in 2012 as the superintendent of two charter schools, I thought what he had to say about Sandy Hook deserved widespread dissemination.

So when did a two-hour show on Revolution Radio, “False Flags (9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing)” on 30 May 2014, as the third segment, I included the second 30-minutes of Sofia’s interview with Paul Preston, which is archived on “The Real Deal” and can be heard here.

Because Preston is also highly trained in school safety issues and had himself organized drills of many kinds, including active-shooter drills, what he has to say is especially telling. He has a website of his own at, which he created to alert listeners to the perils of Agenda 21.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

YouTube – Veterans Today

Transcript of 30-minute clip of Sofia Smallstorm interviewing Paul Preston

Transcription by Jeannon

S = Sofia Smallstrom

P = Paul Preston

S – Welcome back everyone to the Speed of Light on the Pure Momentum Network. 

This is Sofia Smallstorm and we’re listening to a very interesting discussion – Paul Preston, school principal, school safety consultant, teacher, coach, and superintendent. He has been in the California system for 41 years. He is now retired.

So Paul, let’s continue. Can we get a little bit into Sandy Hook now and what set off your antenna about it?

P – Well, you know I’ve been involved in many many situations at schools that have been, you know, emergency type situations and was involved even to some degree with the Columbine situation in that we had an individual who as trying to blow up the school, our school, at the time. In a similar fashion to what was a predicted bomb threat that occurred at Columbine thee days before the Columbine shooting, and that’s how we kind of got in touch with the Columbine people. They got in touch with us because it turned out to be a similar neo-Nazi group that was related to the Trench Coat Mafia, of all people.

And so learning and watching ad seeing all these incidences play out, all these school shootings, I took an enormous interest in because we were doing a study trying to determine because the neo-Nazis we had been working with in our school along the same time of the Columbine incident were telling us that there was going to be some big event take place. And so our staff, myself, we all wanted to sit down and figure where this was all going to and we studied a lot of the Nazi websites and so on, and we figured out that yes, something big was going to happen.

Well then Columbine happened. So we watched with a lot of intensity and under with my own circumstances and also with watching the videos and replays of the other active shooter situations, I became sort of a specialist in that and applied it to my own active-shooter training that I was doing and conducting with my own people.

S – Right. And now can we get in to Sandy Hook?

P – Well yes. Of all the hundreds of hours that I spent watching these scenarios and investigating and reporting on them on my radio show, the first thing I noticed when I heard about Sandy Hook when I turned on the TV like everybody else …now I have always told everybody when you’re seeing these things play out in real time, the best news reporting is what’s happening in real time – that day of, you know, the moments that are around the incident. But document for yourself what’s going on because you’ll never see it again.

And the first thing that caught my eye as I was watching everything play out was the lack of intensity with which people were moving and that really disturbed me. It hit me within the first few minutes, watching the video, the helicopters flying around and so on. Things just didn’t seem to be right, like I would always understand in an incident command system. People weren’t rushing around. People weren’t panicking. They ran that one guy off into the woods and then they arrested him. They took him away and there was no connectedness to that.

I was also wondering why all the emergency equipment wasn’t around the school. And I didn’t see any students either and that really bothered me.

S – So, it was almost like too slow motion for a real event. Not enough panic. Not enough chaos. You had mentioned chaos earlier being a part of these real situations. And a lot of support people rushing around like press and police but not running fast enough, not running with intensity and alarm and panic and concern, I think.

P – None of that was there.

S – Yes. So all right, and then what did you start thinking?

P – Well, just within the first 10 or 15 minutes, it just all looked too staged to me, and I know about staging these things since I’ve staged a number of them. And, like I said, then you stage something there’s a complete lack of intensity as you would have in a real scenario when there’s panic really taking hold of people and they’re really afraid and they’re screaming and yelling and so on.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

But the one thing that really bothered me was where were the kids. You know they had how many hundreds of kids there at the school. I didn’t see them.

S – Right

P – And there was lack of accounting for them.

And right away – and I’ll juxtaposition this with the situation that happened in Pennsylvania. You saw the kids right away. I know it’s a high school, but you know, you saw the kids right away and you saw their plan of evacuation of the school unfolding.

Now this is where it really falls apart with Sandy Hook for me. I saw…I saw no evidence of a real plan of student evacuation taking place. And that stuck to my head like crazy when I was in the moments watching this whole thing play out in real time.

S – That’s very interesting. No evidence of a real plan. Because only someone…I mean everybody had their own response to it. Some of us were already clued in from previous kinds of situations. All this has got to be not what they’re telling us it is. But you come from the industry, the business, and you felt that there is… I would say you knew … It probably was not even a feeling. It was like, you know, set in stone in your head. Where’s the plan? I don’t see the plan playing itself out. Right?

P – I saw same of your evacuation centers and I saw some of your colored tarps on the ground, the colored taps and so on, but even that pretty odd because normally if you have the tarps out there…in every active shooter situation you have ever see, there’s somebody on the tarp or there’s been some help that’s been given to somebody when somebody has been wounded, but none of that was even evident. And I don’t see anybody trying to rush to anybody’s help at all in a mass casualty situation.

See, when you don’t see that…I mean…I’ll go back to the example that I have before about the 13 who overdosed. We had people everywhere, and we had people everywhere until everybody was safe, which was 35, 40 minutes, almost an hour. And that was never happening there at Sandy Hook. You didn’t see the mass of people doing that.

S – Yes, it’s more like the press filled in for that missing element. The press sounded more concerned and panicked on TV as they reported but the actual participants were not so …And se got, you know, long after the fact we got the supposed 911 calls, we got various people giving their versions of it on television as they got interviewed. But we didn’t see it on the ground. And so how long did you watch it for? Over a period of days, weeks? And what were your thoughts?

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

P – You know, I make it a study. I study these things intensely, and what really, what really put me over the top was the next morning with Robbie Parker going out there, and I saw that clip as it happened. And I said there’s something really wrong here.

And that’s when I started thinking about the …the actors. You can actually rent these actors out. In fact that put these things up for training all the time.

And I just said ‘this is not…first of all, his demeanor was terrible. I would never go out…and I know sometimes this happens but…to send a parent out to talk to the press in that fashion about the daughter that he just lost. None of that seemed to be appropriate. None of it seemed to fit. And his behavior with the smiling laughing thing and getting into character that you could see. I said ‘ hmmm, I’m not buying this. I’m just not buying it.’

S – Yes, I know. Very few other people did. So, did you contact anyone? Did you speak to anyone? I don’t mean officially but in your own network of friends.

P – Yes.

S – And what were their thoughts.

P – Almost everybody was unanimous that it was a false flag.

S – And when did you start looking it up on the Internet because I think people started posting immediately. You know, they were making YouTubes. The community began to express online. So when did you start looking into all of that?

P – We–a side note to this is that I have a lot of sources in and around and in that area. I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag.

S – Now these are quasi-official… what kind of sources are these?

P – Let me say that there are the sources that are very close to this administration who knows what’s going on.

S – Really. So they are really like almost insiders then?

P – Oh yes.

S – And they all….they say it was a false flag because they figured it out like you did, or they had actually factual knowledge of such..

P – They had factual knowledge of such. That’s part of the plan.

S – I see. And so how much were they willing to tell you, and what else were they willing to tell you? Anything?

P – Oh, they told me quite a bit, and some of it I can’t reveal to you, but it fits the narrative of the anti-gun movement and the disarmament of America and that’s what the focus was.

S – And you realized that that’s part of the broader picture? That’s the Agenda 21 society?

P – Absolutely.

S – So do you want to tell us a little but about that or do you want to stick with the Sandy Hook material? I’ll let you decide.

P – Well, let’s go ahead with the Sandy Hook material and then we can jump into that.

S – OK, so we’re past Robbie Parker now, and what about the funerals? You must have known then that …Did you have any concept about victims or no victims, et cetera?

P – Well, that whole thing was pretty shaky. What was really starting to filter in in the system and was just confirming what I was already being told about these charity sites that had been developed. By the way, they were put up the day before the shooting. And I had gotten some screen shots, and I had confirmed with my sources. Some of them were thinking that it was a very sloppy operation actually.

But there were reassurances to me that there really were no victims and that everything’s being staged.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

And of course the funerals to me…you go and look at the whole funeral process. It looked like they were all staged, from the Robbie Parker one in Utah, or the Sarah Parker one with the Parker family.

And then I started getting information from people that actually had attended that funeral who lived in Utah and said that was something very funny about it.

S – Now I would like to ask you whether your sense is that these are real families even, or are they patched together?

P – Well, you know, that’s a good question because, you know, the thing that rolls around in my head, you know, the actors type of thing, you know. You know because you can put families together and these acting programs will do that under certain training scenarios. And so, it’s a good question. It really is a fair question to ask whether or not they were real families.

S – And then of course because they continue to speak and organize and be called upon to comment, they have to be formed into these family groupings over time. And remain grouped like that whether they are truly married or not.

You know, here’s one thing that I noticed. When you see a couple, if they seem really like an odd couple, then that kind of strikes you as weird. And I saw that. I saw a very odd coupled-ness with lots of these Sandy Hook families. It seemed to me, why would this person marry this person and live with them? They’re so totally different. That happens sometimes but in this content it really jumped out at me…myself anyway. I didn’t know if you noticed that…

P – It’ different to say, you know, when you saw them together whether they are natural families or not. That’s…I’m suspicious of that. And like I say, I’m suspicious because I know that you can put these families together, you know, with some of these acting companies out there. And that just kind of blends in with what I was already being suspicious about.

And so, there’s a lot of things that would go into the details of examining this. And I’ve see a lot of the pictures and so on, and some of the pictures don’t match up, especially the one of the Parkers in the White House. And it looks like to me that’s Sarah Parker sitting there that’s, you know, supposed to be a victim.

S – There’s no Sarah Parker…

P – Which one is it…maybe it’s not the Parker…

S – Oh, you mean with Obama…

P – Yes, right.

S – Emily or Madeline …those are the two order sisters, and a lot of people felt that that was Emily Parker leaning on Obama.

P – Yes, that was Emily Parker…

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

S – Have you seen the Super Bowl video?

P – Yes, I have seen that.

S – Well, there is a girl who looks a lot like an older Emily Parker in that video. So if that was Emily at the White House, or actually I think…I don’t know if it was at the White House…but with Obama, she couldn’t be six in one picture and then just a month or two later, twelve or thirteen.

P – Right.

S – That’s where we have to make a decision.

But what did you think of all the photographs of the children? Did you notice anything – the portraits that we were shown that these were the victims? Did you notice anything about those portraits?

P – No, other than some of the malformations of different parts of their bodies – seemed to be a pretty obvious thing.

The whole thing …when you take a look at the totality of this, in my opinion, it’s very sloppily done.

S – Why would it have been sloppily done though?

P – Well, you know, when …and again, it’s kind of like sometimes there’s order that comes out of chaos. And when you have these chaotic situations, people want to put things back together as best they possibly can to feel more comfortable or to recover from it. And I didn’t see any of that. I don’t know if that makes any sense to anybody. People don’t want to have that chaos. They want to heal. They want to come back together. They want to solve a problem so that they can move forward.

And that’s part of what happens when you do these drills is that you take a day or so and you talk about what happened so that you can improve upon and make it better. People do that naturally even when there’s chaos and there’s an emergency situation because they want to seek normalcy again.

I didn’t see the same kind of emotions, if you will, or the same kind of communications between parents, kids, that you would normally see in these situations. It just didn’t look…it looked phony to me.

S – So you mean the community itself, they did not try to repair in the organic way…?

P – I would say that is true, from the parents to the kids, to the entire community.

S – What do you think of this privacy issue that has been bandied about by the authorities, that all the privacy needs to be respected, and you can’t reveal this or that…?

P – That to me just adds more fuel to the fire because that’s not what you do in the normal situation of an incident command system. You get the facts out because you know oftentimes when you get the facts out, you’re also looking for criminal behavior, and the more information that you can get out that that’s way, the better.

And I’m certainly not buying the notion that the parents weren’t allowed to see the kids.

S – The bodies, identifying the…

P – I just…that to me…that should be a red flag to anybody who has looked in to Sandy Hook. The parents weren’t allowed to do that. What’s up with that.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today


S – And what did you think of the coroner’s behavior at his press conference?

P – Well there’s many things about him. I just …I …first of all, I didn’t understand why all of a sudden there’s 26 bodies and then there’s no coroner or doctor who’s looked at the bodies and they’re declared dead. And then all of a sudden the coroner comes out and everybody says that there was an automatic gun or a handgun that was used, and the coroner, on his own, comes out and says ‘oh no, that was an AR15 that was used.’

So there’s a lot of confusion, you know, about that coroner, his report, his reporting out. Nothing seems very clear and concise to me. And you know I would argue that, you know, as I looked at him and watched what was going on, he seemed to be just answering question on the fly without a lot of knowledge behind the questions.

S – And this suggested to you that this was a sloppily created event?

P – Absolutely.

S – And would you say that that was because of the portent of the whole thing that they…there were people involved in this…let’s say Dr. Carver, the coroner, who had some idea, if it was a scripted event, it was going to go big, and really big? So do you think that the sloppiness of it was because in being organized, it’s very difficult to juggle how people are going to perform given that they know how big this thing could get?

P – Well, you know, what happens is that you…if you’re going to do these things and carry it through with the lie, everybody’s got to be telling the same lie at the same time all the time.

And I think with my judgments about the parents and the kids, and seeing them lie, I was seeing a big lie being perpetrated right in front of me because nothing seemed to be consistent. And like you said, which I thought was interesting, is that oftentimes the media would fill in a lot of the blanks for you.

A classic example of the blanks comes up when you talk about where are the kids that are evacuating the school. There were helicopters that were circling overhead. They certainly would have been able to show, you know, hundreds of kids exiting the school.

That was never shown. But you did see a picture out in a parking lot, which by the way if you take a long look at this picture of all these kids being led out, about 15 or 20 kids being led out by teachers and adults from this parking lot, if you take a look at the parking lot from the aerial views, you can see that there are different cars in the parking lot in that area. So obviously that was done during some sort of drill. That’s my opinion. And it didn’t match with what was going on at the time. So nothing is matching in real time for me. That’s just another thing.

But where are the kids? Where were the kids? They weren’t present. They just weren’t there. So that’s the kind of stuff that wasn’t worked out and, you know, they were doing things on the fly. That’s why I say…I would say it was very amateur, very amateurish as to what was going on.

S – Which is surprising because in the powers that would have designed this thing – that it would be so amateur – but…

You are familiar with the character, Gene Rosen?

P – Gene Rosen – which one was …?

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

S – Gene Rosen was the man who was very close to the school and he took the kids in and offered them juice and cookies, and he gave many different…he recounted his rescuing or fielding these kids differently in many interviews. So can you comment on that?

P – I can comment on this because this points to this proves my point that these kids …did they get off a bus? Where did they go? OK, I think that one of the stories was that the kids got off the bus and they made their way to his house, and there was all this panic or whatever was going on. OK, there’s something really wrong with that picture to begin with.

First of all, when you’re doing these scenarios and this school had to have been trained for this because FEMA requires these trainings, and if you’re getting safety monies from the federal government, which every school does, they have to follow the proper protocols and that’s the proper release of the students to their parents.

S – Right. He said, that children showed up on his lawn and they were with a bus driver, in one story. In another story, they were just there by themselves and they were repeating babbling that there teacher was dead. So what…would the protocol be that the children…the children, according to the story, left the school on their own.

P – Well, that to me, that’s very suspicious in and of itself.

S – Right, I mean the cops had not gotten there in the first five minutes. Apparently some of them could still hear shooting going on, and how did the kids get out and just run down the road, you know?

P – All that seems to be …and again, I want to go into the thing about the incident command system, evacuation, walk-outs and so on. None of that fits that protocol. None of it.

The story of Gene Rosen or any of that stuff — None of that fits. That to me is just more evidence that there were no students other than the actor students that were there.

S – Then what was the purpose of having the Gene Rosen player?

P – Diversion.

S – From what?

P – A diversion from the other realities going on and to add more hype about the story. It’s the same thing about the guy that was chased through the woods. You know, they had a couple of guys that were chased through the woods. What were they all about?

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

And there were no answers about any of that, about where they came from and even my people couldn’t come up with an answer about that. Some of my people say it was very sloppily done.

S – These are your insider people, right?

P – Right.

S – Now did you see any of the videos of the people circling through the firehouse?

P – Yes.

S – And did that strike you …what did you think of that?

P – Well, I had already come to my conclusion that this was a drill, and again, being very suspicious of the Obama administration, Diane Feinstein, Second Amendment issues, using Agenda 21 in particular, I had not see that for quite some time afterwards, maybe a couple of weeks after.

We were engaged in our own things that we were doing in terms of investigations and stuff like that. We’re pretty intense about what we’re doing here on Agenda 21 Radio, and we have some very highly placed sources of information that comes to us and which we’re very grateful for.

I, for one reason or another, hadn’t seen that video maybe two or three weeks until after the incident.

There’s more evidence right there because what in the world were all those people doing there to begin with? You see, if you’re doing an incident command situation, there’s a place for those people and those people can be moved on rather than seeing that circus that was going on, which is what that was. That was all staged.

S – Right. And these were far too many adults, no children whatsoever, no panic. And to me the people that were there-–they weren’t dressed for December. So some people have suggested that that particular drill, the circling in and out of the firehouse, took place a lot earlier, and it matches the time frame and the clothing of the children evacuated from the school. They did not have their coats.

And I was going to ask you, is it normal when there’s an emergency for the teacher to evacuate the children without letting them get their coats, or would they take the extra time and say ‘children go put your goats on as fast as you can.’ How does that work?

P – Well no. If there’s a signal to get them out of the building, and there’s always a signal of some sort to get them out of the building safely, they go directly out. Period. End of subject

And if they can get their coat, that’s great, but the safety thing is to get them away from where there potentially is a threat and that would be the key thing. And again, you pointed to something else and I brought this up earlier about the drill that we used to run and people would always, you know, screw up the drill because they would knock on the door in an active shooter situation and the teacher would open the door.

Well, you know, how does that all play out? I was looking at things pretty much in real time within minutes of news being broadcast as it was happening from a helicopter. Now I am a real-time kind of guy. So I’m looking at maybe 15 minutes into the shooter, maybe 20 minutes into the shooter situation. I’m looking at clear video of the campus and so on. I’m not seeing anything happening.

Where are the kids? The kids aren’t there.

S – Right.

P – And they should be released or what’s going on with them?

S – And there were some people said that they were in closets for up to four hours. That doesn’t make any sense either.

P – That does not many any sense to me because what happens, and again it goes back to the police, and back to Columbine, they will go in and check every nook and cranny. And quite frankly, I know how that’s done. We used to do that. We always used to look and check to see where people were.

S – Right. And you would not miss large adults hiding in small closets.

And the idea of Katelyn Boyd and some of these teachers bundling up all their kids into the bathroom and having a few sit on the toilet…I even heard the toilet roll holder, my god, that’s pretty tough to do even for a six year old. But what do you think of that? That doesn’t make sense to me.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

YouTube – Veterans Today

Sofia Smallstorm, “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 dimensions”

P – Well, you know, we tell people in an active shooter situation to seek…to hide or …if there is a shooter there to take the challenge. We used to do these things where we had these dummy books and we’d bring in an active shooter as the stage person and throw books at them, you know, because that really throws them off. You’re taught those kinds of little techniques to throw the active shooter off.

But I can imagine some people getting holed up in a closet or something like that if they haven’t been able to lock the door. And that’s one of the things we tell our people all of the time. Lock the door. And we made sure in all schools, and all schools should have the, the doors should have the inside key on them, you know, so you can use an inside key on them also as we could on the outside.

S – So we have a couple of minutes left at this first hour. Do you have anything to say about Adam Lanza – fiction, non-fiction, real?

P – Well, just on the surface of it, and again I would throw out I’m highly specialized trained in drugs and alcohol recognition, obviously looks like he has some meds onboard just by the look. But you know if you couch that along the same lines that that this may be a fictional event, that he’s a fictional character, which fits his description of what I see there.

And of course if you’re doing a fictionalized event like this, you want to have the most crazed individual that you can have looking at you through the picture there, and that’s exactly what you have. That’s my speculation. I think that’s what they wanted. That’s what they did.

And he has a history and what is the history? We’re not real clear on the history. You know, first of all, they found out that he’s got his brother’s driver’s license. Then there’s some confusion. And you know it one of these kind of scenarios that just didn’t quite fit.

And as a school person that to me was one of the big pieces of evidence. Why does he have his brother’s license? And then they made contact his brother that I guess was in Jersey some place, wherever he was, and there was an investigation. That all seemed to be tracking with me as a distraction about what was really happening at the school.


Click here: “Conspiracy Analyst: Does Adam Lanza even exist?”

Another piece of the puzzle that simply doesn’t fit has surfaced in the Sandy Hook ShootingThe hat that Adam Lanza was allegedly wearing, as documented in the Connecticut State Police Final Report, was not manufactured until 2013.

With the shooting happening on December 14, 2012 this certainly makes no sense.

Wolfgang Halbig has previously reported that the final documentation reads like an 11,000 page script.

As more and more people sift through this information it is uncertain what may be found, but this particular item is quite interesting and not easily explained. One of the many Sandy Hook researchers took it upon herself to research Adam Lanza’s hat from the crime scene and what she found suggests that either time travel was used or that there has been false evidence presented, for whatever reason.

Jim Fetzer reports for Veterans Today:

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page


Even more proof that the entire exercise was a charade has emerged from the Connecticut State Police Final Report in the form of photos of a hat that alleged shooter Adam Lanza is supposed to have worn. It’s black and made of a durable material of the kind hunters and fishermen might wear. Scroll down to “Photographs, Primary Scene,” and you will find several of the hat that he is alleged to have worn:

Hat 1

A student of Sandy Hook by the name of “Bridget” noticed that, in addition to these two photos of the hat, there are others, which provide more detailed information about its brand and source of manufacture, an issue that she would pursue:

Hat 2


Bridget wrote repeatedly to FLEXFIT and eventually made contact with someone who could assist her named “Leslie”. In her last email to Leslie on 13 August 2014, she reiterated her keen interest in information about manufacturing the hat:

From: Bridget

Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:37 PM 

To: [email protected]/

Subject: HELLO??

I was wondering if you were going to possibly call me back in regards to my recent request? Sorry to keep bothering you about this. I know it seems like an odd request. I also left you a voicemail at your office.

It would be much appreciated if you could keep me in the loop. 

Thanks,– *::Bridget::*

This time, rather to Bridget’s surprise, Leslie wrote back with a comprehensive discussion of the problems she had locating the information that Bridget had requested, but answering that that model with the elastic band was only available in 2013:

———- Forwarded message ———-<</em>

From: Leslie<</em>[email protected]> Date: Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM Subject: RE: HELLO?? To: “Bridget”

Hello Bridget, Sorry for the delay in responding… I have reached out to my Production Team here and in NY.. And I contacted my factory overseas….to see if I could get some answers regarding: The production cycle – and being able to identify product by label etc… So it has taken some time to go to the appropriate people who might help

In identifying the timeline as to when this was made, who purchased the hat and when we changed our labeling.

Unfortunately – I cannot give you a ‘definitive’ answer, although I can give you a really good idea and bet that I am 98% correct. I would just hate to find out that it could be wrong, so please keep that in mind.

The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped us in our search. Here are the areas of issue:

1. I cannot see if there is a Flexfit ‘Flag’ label (This specific label was only produced and sold on the east coast for a period of time. I can speculate that it was during this time based on the style of the hat, because I have been working here for well over 20 years, but it is not definitive.) This is on the brim, where the crown meets the brim top side.

2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any that we have produced, which is odd because I have contacted our overseas production department as well, and they also do not use those numbers.

We produce blank inventory such as the bucket cap – and they are shipped to 2 different distribution centers. One on the east coast and another on the west coast…so stock levels are sold and replenished regularly, but we do keep track of the numbers on the hats for inventory and identifying sales.

This style is carried over from year to year with little to no change –as it is a staple item. So we need to keep it consistent as possible for our customers/distributors who purchase it yearly, but I do recognize that this hat was during a year we had been making changes by the lot. My California distribution center alone – receives on an average 5 to 7… 40 foot containers of various cap styles weekly.

3. We have done 5 updates to this cap within the last 20 years that I have been with the company.

a.) We removed the flag label from the brim – (I mentioned above) approx. 3 years ago. With that being said, that would have been in 2011. This photo was taken in 2012. That does not mean that this person would have not kept on to the hat after the year we removed that label. I would assume most people keep their hats years after their original purchase.

But we would have continued to sell through any product still in the warehouse until it was sold out – so it could have carried over longer than when we actually stopped producing it with the label. I know that they stopped selling this item on the east coast and west coast both around the end of 2012. (Not sure on the exact month and day).

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me.

There is an ‘identifying marker’ on this item I can see from the photo you have given – that can tell us when it was made and where it was purchased…However I am still looking into the number listed on the hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find out the purchaser from this number.)

I’m sorry I could not be of more help right now – if you have any further questions please let me know. Until then I will continue to look into this and get back with you as my time allows. Sorry for the delayed response.

I wish you luck with what you’re looking for. I know it meant a lot to you.

Thank you, Best Regards, Leslie

So FLEXFIT, the company that “Adam Lanza’s hat” found lying on the ground at the Sandy Hook School Crime Scene (above) has confirmed that this particular hat was not manufactured until March 2013. That model of the inner elastic portion of the hat was zoomed in on and reviewed by the company, which has indicated that they did not manufacture that band on those hats prior March 2013 in their factory in Vietnam.

As Yvonne Adamow has observed, ”This poses a particularly interesting quandary, insofar as the hat that (according to the Connecticut State Police report) Adam Lanza was wearing had not yet been manufactured by 14 December 2012, the day of the shooting. It was not manufactured, in fact, for several months after the shooting. There appear to be only two answers to this problem: (1) time machines were used; (2) the pictures were staged. Call me crazy, but I’ll go with (2).”

It is unclear where the “March” 2013 date comes from. It does not seem to be cited in Jim’s report. Maybe that is when new manufacturing lines are updated, or were updated in 2013. Either way the month does not matter because Sandy Hook happened in 2012.

From the email exchange we see that the hat was likely manufactured after the beginning 2011 because of its style, however, because of the inner band it was likely manufactured in 2013.

This is just a small piece of the overall puzzle and proves nothing in and of itself.

But if that hat was manufactured in 2013, which appears highly likely, then the evidence appears to be tainted.

If you can think of another explanation please let me know. Once you’ve thought of one, scroll down and dispute THAT mountain too!








Sandy Hook was just SOOO obvious. Almost ALL of the school shootings lately have been trumped up by the media and team Obama. I go into that deeper in a recent post titled: BOGUS SCHOOL SHOOTING “DATA” RELEASED BY BLOOMBERG’S PEOPLE. That list of shootings is being circulated by as “legitimate” and it looks like the following:

The truth of what happened is almost exactly as we “Conspiracy Folks” had long since figured out. The school was in fact COMPLETELY EMPTY on the day of the shooting. The victims were literally brought in. For a better understanding of all that, see my previous posts on this issue.


See, the more they under this situation… this is just my speculation – the more they could distract from the actual Sandy Hook school site itself and stage things away from there, the more they could sell the story of Sandy Hook on the whole.

S – That’s a very very good point, Paul. Excellent. And we should add that the mug shot that they gave us of Adam Lanza was very painterly. It wasn’t even a photo, and it did have that, you know, ghoulish expression on it to make us think this is a real lunatic.

But we are now at the end of our first hour and I really really thank you, Paul Preston, for being with us. And we will take up a second hour discussion in the Members Section. So this is Sofia Smallstorm thanking everyone for listening to this first hour and please do come to and join us for the second hour in the Members Section with Paul Preston, 41 years in the public schools and someone who has been through a lot of staging of drills and has a lot of drill understanding and experience.

Courtesy of Veterans Today.

Read the article at DC Clothesline here:


Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

Demolition work is underway at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut




The Daily Sheeple finds it odd when an interviewer passes over a child admitting that there was a drill on the day of the Sandy Hook shooting you have to ask yourself why. He completely ignores what the child has said and carries on with his next question…

If you didn’t know better, you might think the reporter was trying to advance an agenda, and not news… but that would never happen I’m sure!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

As much of this information was coming to light, THE LEAD INVESTIGATOR DROPPED DEAD (????) AT AGE 49. If that doesn’t strike you as “ODD,” you may want to check out DEATHS CONNECTED TO THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE: TOO MANY TO COUNT!






Keep Your Guns




It is of interest to the American people to take note of those who they entrust to serve them. We are a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, yet time and time again in this country we have leaders in government who put on the guise of “patriot” and then turn out to be the criminal in garb.

We learned in the past about the criminal acts of anti-gun mayors. ( We found that anti-gun mayors are criminals themselves, guilty as charged within their own ranks of such crimes as tax evasion, extortion, accepting bribes, child pornography, trademark counterfeiting, perjury, and one demigod mayor was even convicted of assaulting a police officer.

Join my Twitter feed | Like my Facebook page

The crimes that these anti-gunner mayors are convicted of suggest they are public enemies rather than public servants. No wonder they want to take guns from law-abiding citizens.

These politicians know all the well that where the citizenry operates in the rights given to them without government interference, namely the right to bear arms, crime diminishes. And with mud on their face, they know when they interfere with the right to bear armscrime skyrockets.

What we see is that some of today’s politicians are magnifying the crimes they are placed in office to prevent.

They allow crime to be promoted through entertainment and when the crime is committed, they are there in hopes to grab the guns away.

This is exactly how criminals in government operate. They demonize the gun, not the criminal.

Friends, this mentality is like blaming spoons for people being overweight, as if to say the act is apart from the actor.

Since criminal politicians refuse to look at history, which can be at the present our greatest teacher, it is very clear that gun banners know exactly what they are attempting to do -– put the Second Amendment in the crosshairs.

Looking back, who has committed murder in the largest degree? Dictators Adolf Hilter, Mao Tze Tung, Josef Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, etc.

Time and time again it has been a corrupt government who is responsible for the mass murder of their own people under the deceptive guise of “gun control,” all of which the said dictators implemented.

Keep in mind these people promised their citizens protection and freedom upon the forfeiture of their guns.

How many times, I ask, does history need to repeat itself?


Paralleling History

Let’s parallel history with the present ideology and methodology that those in the past blueprinted to implement gun control.

Mass murderer Adolf Hitler at a dinner talk on April 11, 1942 said:

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.  History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.”

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

Josef Stalin, the sole leader of the Soviet Union from 1924 to 1953, said:

“If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.”

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Mao Tze Tung, communist dictator of China said:

“War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.”

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Idi Amin, president of Uganda from 1971 to 1979, said:

“I do not want to be controlled by any superpower. I myself consider myself the most powerful figure in the world, and that is why I do not let any superpower control me.”

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Pol Pot, who created in Cambodia one of the 20th century’s most brutal and radical regimes, was responsible for killing one million of his own ‘educated,’ yet unarmed citizens.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]



Our forefathers did not arm the American people for the purpose of hunting, but rather to protect themselves from those who were doing the hunting, namely the tyrant King George. The second amendment is only to vouchsafe our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and to ensure all of the other rights given unto us by our Creator.

The wisdom of the framers of the Constitution once again is found consistent with the lessons of the Bible they used as their bedrock for civil law. The people’s individual protection should always be a primary concern of government “of the people”. In a righteous country, self-government reigns by the constraint of Christian morals. The civil government that desires such a monopoly of force (i.e. they are the only ones with guns) is a threat to the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens, for that government ceases to be “of and for the people.”

George Washington, our first president, said:

“From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.”

Courtesy of


Man ordered to undergo mental health evaluation

Sandy Hook

A conspiracy theorist was arrested and ordered to undergo a mental health evaluation after he called several schools in Newtown to claim that the 2012 Sandy Hook shootings were “fake”.

30-year-old Timothy Rogalski called the Sandy Hook Elementary School on Tuesday morning and left four messages on the school’s answering machine before speaking to an administrative assistant. Using his father’s name, Rogalski said he wanted to enroll a child in the school but wanted to make sure no more “fake” shootings would occur.

After calling two other schools in Newtown, police traced the number back to Rogalski and arrested him at his home.

While Rogalski’s behavior was idiotic and his remarks will undoubtedly be offensive to many, the claim that the phone calls were “threatening” in nature is up for debate.

“I just wanted to make sure that there was going to be no fake shooting on the day that I enrolled him,” court records showed Rogalski said. “I just wanted to clarify that he wouldn’t get shot by a fake Adam Lanza.”

Rogalski subsequently gave his name as Dawn Hochsprung, the name of the deceased principal, before accusing the school of greed for taking charitable donations.

Rogalski apologized for his comments, but asserted that he never intended to threaten anyone.

“I know I may have offended people, but they were words, and I made no threats. I wasn’t going to do anything,” Rogalski said.

Rogalski is being held on a $50,000 bond and will undergo a psychological screening. He has been charged with harassment and will appear in court again on April 22.

There have been numerous instances of Americans being arrested and forced to undergo psychological testing for controversial political beliefs in recent years.

The most noteworthy example occurred in 2012 when former Iraq and Afghanistan veteran Brandon Raub was kidnapped from his home by police, FBI and Secret Service agents and forcibly incarcerated in a psychiatric ward by authorities in Virginia in response to Facebook posts which the FBI deemed “terrorist” in nature. Raub’s posts questioned the official story behind 9/11 and referred to corruption within the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve.

Facebook @

FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @

Read the story here at Infowars:


By: Voice of Reason




Sandy Hook FBI


False Flag


Keep Your Guns






Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.