Tweets by realDonaldTrump

Online:
Visits:
Stories:

By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Facebook Says It Will Help Security Services Identify Potential “Terrorists”

Saturday, May 9, 2015 17:05

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

FACEBOOK & THE GOVERNMENT DOING WHAT THEY DO BEST:

BEING SHADY AS HELL!

In the event you have not seen or read Facebook’s new 2015 SHADY PRIVACY AGREEMENT, it is worth noticing that in 2015, to use Facebook you must adhere to their privacy agreement. Within that agreement it states: Sometimes we GET DATA FROM OUR AFFILIATES or our advertising partners, customers and “OTHER THIRD PARTIES” that HELPS US (OR THEM) deliver ads, understand online activity, and GENERALLY make Facebook better.

IF YOU DON’T THINK “OTHER PARTIES” INCLUDES THE CIA, FBI, & NSA, KEEP READING!

Joe Biggs Infowars reporter brings us the latest…

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

IT’S NOT ON THE FIRST PAGE OF PRIVACY TERMS, YOU HAVE TO DIG FOR IT:

We also receive other types of information about you:

We receive data about you whenever you use or are running Facebook, such as when you look at another person’s timeline, send or receive a message, search for a friend or a Page, click on, view or otherwise interact with things, use a Facebook mobile app, or make purchases through Facebook.

When you post things like photos or videos on Facebook, we may receive additional related data (or metadata), such as the time, date, and place you took the photo or video.

We receive data from or about the COMPUTER, MOBILE PHONE , or OTHER DEVICES you use to install Facebook apps or to access Facebook, including when multiple users log in from the same device. This may include NETWORK and communication information, such as your IP ADDRESS or mobile PHONE NUMBER, and other information about things like your INTERNET SERVICE, OPERATING SYSTEM, location, the type (including identifiers) of the device or browser you use, or the pages you visit. For example, we may get your GPS or other location information so we can tell you if any of your friends are nearby, or we could request device information to improve how our apps work on your device.

We receive data whenever you visit a game, application, or website that uses Facebook Platform or visit a site with a Facebook feature (such as a social plugin), sometimes through cookies. This may include the date and time you visit the site; the web address, or URL, you’re on; technical information about the IP address, browser and the operating system you use; and, if you are logged in to Facebook, your User ID.

Sometimes we GET DATA FROM OUR AFFILIATES or our advertising partners, customers and ”OTHER THIRD PARTIES” that HELPS US (OR THEM) deliver ads, understand online activity, and GENERALLY make Facebook better. For example, an advertiser may tell us information about you (like how you responded to an ad on Facebook or on another site) in order to measure the effectiveness of – and improve the quality of – ads.

THE ABOVE CAN BE FOUND AT: https://www.facebook.com/full_data_use_policy

If you are one of those who read that and thought, “Well I’m not leaving Facebook… I don’t do anything illegal, so I have nothing to worry about…,” then WOW are you missing the point. QUESTION: Do you think the Tea Party groups the IRS targeted were afraid of doing anything “illegal” when they were targeted for trying to exercise FREE SPEECH? If you say yes, GET OUT OF HERE, and don’t come back. The point is, once that door is cracked, there is no turning back. That is WHY before the National Defense Authorization Act, we had this great little Amendment contained within the Bill of Rights (back when we HAD a Bill of Rights) that read as follows:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. “

Notice it says “SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED.” There is NOTHING ambiguous about the intended meaning there. ZIP! ZERO! Under our Constitution a SEARCH occurs when GOVERNMENT conduct violates a REASONABLE EXPECTATION of privacy. Notice that says GOVERNMENT. That means is if your child’s principal picks up your child’s backpack because he or she suspects there are drugs in the backpack, and goes on to find drugs, your child’s Fourth Amendment Right was not violated. Principals are not government agents. The same goes for employers; they are not GOVERNMENT AGENTS either.

A person is said to have a REASONABLE EXPECTATION of privacy in places like: THEIR HOME, A HOTEL ROOM, THEIR OFFICE, THE BACKYARD OF THEIR HOME, THEIR LUGGAGE, etc. Places where we DO NOT have a reasonable expectation against the government include: PUBLIC STREETS, OPEN FIELDS, OUR GARBAGE CANS (EVEN WHEN PLACED BY THE CURB ON THE STREET), or ITEMS ABANDONED. For anything else the government has to have a WARRANT, and absent EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES (which I won’t even get into), to get a warrant THREE REQUIREMENTS have to be met:

Search warrant must be issued by a NEUTRAL MAGISTRATE
There must be PROBABLE CAUSE to believe that the items sought are the FRUIT, INSTRUMENTALITIES, or EVIDENCE of a crime
Warrant must describe the PROPERTY and PLACE to be searched with PARTICULARITY

Pay careful attention to that last one. It means FISHING EXPEDITIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED (AKA fishing through your computer). Under our constitution The most basic definition of a seizure is when government meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possessory property rights or liberty. So in order to have a seizure of a person or property, there must be a meaningful interference with a person’s property or with their liberty. Pillaging through your computer I would CERTAINLY think is a “MEANINGFUL INTERFERENCE!”

I posted quite some time ago, in addition to the copy of your calls on tape at the NSA, IF YOU HAVE FACEBOOK MESSENGER INSTALLED ON YOUR SMARTPHONE, THEN BY VIRTUE OF INSTALLING MESSENGER, YOU GRANTED FACEBOOK THE RIGHT TO RECORD YOUR CALLS AT WILL.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

SOMETIMES it pays to actually read the disclosures! Whether you are using Facebook Messenger or not, the app works directly with your phone’s mic, so it makes no difference if the program is in use. In that way it is much like what the government has been doing for years (SEE VIDEO BELOW!). Most people don’t know even if your phone is POWERED OFF, the government is listening. The only way to STOP them is to remove the battery. Notice how you can’t do that on most phones anymore?

HERE IS A REAL GEM!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

THAT VIDEO WON’T BE UP LONG… IT NEVER IS!

MOST COPIES HAVE BEEN TAKEN DOWN BY HIS HIGHNESS’S ASS.

By the way, government has been doing that for 5-10 years now. Only recently did people realize it was not “conspiracy!” Hopefully you knew all that already, so when I tell you NOT ONLY IS FACEBOOK RECORDING YOUR EVERY WORD, THEY ARE ALSO TRACKING YOUR KEYSTROKES. REMEMBER the email you ALMOST sent your girlfriend or wife while drunk, but you deleted it instead?

NEWSFLASH: IT’S STILL ON FILE AT FACEBOOK!

DOESN’T IT MAKE YOU SICK TO LEARN THEY DON’T PAY TAXES NOW TOO!

Also, it stands to reason that if LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT CAN TAP INTO YOUR LAPTOP CAMERA WITHOUT YOU KNOWING AND SPY ON YOU, the NSA and Facebook are doing the same, so I suggest putting your screens down whenever your computer is not in use.

WAIT A MINUTE… IS THIS THE SAME FACEBOOK THAT WAS BETA TESTING HOW TO INFLUENCE ELECTIONS?

WHY YES, THEY ARE!

The website tells the Government it will “rapidly improve” the identification of imminent threats made by people on its network after it emerged that it failed to pass on information that could have prevented the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby.

Facebook has vowed to start helping the security services identify potential terrorists who are using the social network after it emerged that it failed to pass on information that could have prevented the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby.

The website, which has more than one billion users, has told the Government it will “rapidly improve” the identification of imminent threats made by people on its network.

It was last year disclosed that Facebook failed to pass on information that could have helped to capture Fusilier Rigby’s killers.

Michael Adebowale used the social networking site to express his “intent to murder a soldier in the most graphic and emotive manner” five months before the 2013 Woolwich attack.

A report by Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) found that Facebook had not been aware of that specific exchange.

However, the committee discovered that Facebook had previously shut down Adebowale’s accounts on the site because he had discussed terrorism, but failed to relay concerns to the security services.

The site was described by MPs as a “safe haven” for terrorists.

Rigby, 25, was run over and butchered by Adebowale and Michael Adebolajo outside Woolwich barracks in south-east London on May 22 2013.

David Cameron subsequently said that websites like Facebook have a “moral duty” to act because “their networks are being used to plot murder and mayhem”.

In a response to the ISC report, the Government on Thursday said following the criticism, Facebook has now agreed to assist the authorities if alleged terrorists are using its network to communicate and spread propaganda.

The report, issued by Downing Street said: “The internet companies were asked to report back on the new steps that they could take – they have a social responsibility to ensure their networks do not put the communications of terrorists beyond the reach of the authorities.

“The company concerned has agreed to rapidly improve the identification of imminent threats and to reporting them to law enforcement and we are now engaging with a range of Communications Service Providers to press for the same approach to be adopted across all relevant platforms.”

However, the report said that the Government is still pushing online firms – particularly those based in America – to take “stronger, faster and further action”.

It said that there are still “obstacles” which made it difficult for security officials to obtain the data needed to “investigate and prevent terrorist acts”.

The report added: “The fact that a suspect is using a foreign, internet-based communications service as opposed to a UK-based equivalent should make no difference to our ability to access that suspect’s communications, if that company supplies a service to the UK.”

Read the story here at the Telegraph.co.uk

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

THE VOICE OF REASON