Profile image
By Live Free or Die Alliance
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Strong majority supports warrant requirement for cell phone data (6/7/2015 – 218 citizens, 467 responses)

Friday, June 19, 2015 10:11
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

By Jacquelyn Benson

Earlier this month, the NH Senate passed HB 468, a bill that specifies that law enforcement officers in NH are required to get a warrant before installing GPS trackers or accessing cell phone location data, except in case of emergencies. On June 7th, the Live Free or Die Alliance (LFDA) put the issue to Facebook members, posing the question, “Should police need a warrant to access cell phone location data?”


A total of 87% of respondents answered the question either directly or with a concurrence, and of these a strong 95% majority supported requiring warrants to access cell phone data with only 5% opposed. Of the remaining respondents, a slim 7% opted to discuss the subject in broader terms while 6% commented on unrelated issues. In sum, 218 citizens participated in the discussion with a total of 467 responses.


The overwhelming majority in favor of the bill argued that location data should be subject to Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure. “This is an invasion of privacy. And a warrant should be necessary before this info can be obtained,” one commenter wrote. “Just because someone else owns the intellectual property behind the program or technology, it does not give the government permission to usurp the Fourth Amendment,” another respondent argued.


Opponents of the law countered that it could interfere with time-sensitive investigations, putting lives at risk. “Law enforcement should not have to provide a warrant when they have probable cause… especially in a missing person or homicide case,” one commenter said. “If it helps law enforcement to do their job then let them do their job,” another respondent wrote.


The small percentage of respondents addressing their comments to broader issues discussed whether the bill’s emergency provision should stand or debated wider issues related to data and privacy. “A public post assumes no expectation of privacy. A phone call does,” one commenter noted. “Even in an emergency cops can still get a warrant… it's not that hard,” a respondent said.


The nonprofit, nonpartisan LFDA takes no position on this or any issue. This report is presented as a summary of citizen testimony. As New Hampshire’s Virtual Town Hall, the LFDA community, numbering more than 68,000, provides objective information on state issues, promotes the civil exchange of opinions, and communicates views to elected officials. To learn more about this issue or the LFDA, visit


Jacquelyn Benson is an editor with the Live Free or Die Alliance.

Live Free or Die Alliance


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.