Profile image
By The Media Co-op
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Exclusive: Military missed opportunity for peaceful end to 2013 New Brunswick fracking protests

Wednesday, August 5, 2015 12:29
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Internal documents show repeated Warrior Society requests for negotiating assistance denied

KJIPUKTUK (Halifax) — An Access to Information request has revealed that during the course of anti-shale gas protests in New Brunswick in 2013, 5th Canadian Division Support Base (CDSB) Gagetown, Eastern Canada's largest military facility, was contacted on two separate occasions by high ranking members of the Mi’kmaq Warrior Society. On each occasion, the Warrior Society – one of the key strategic groups involved in the on-the-ground protests that would ultimately see 100 activists arrested – requested negotiators from the Canadian Armed Forces, citing a breakdown in trust and an increasingly toxic working relationship with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

Both these requests for negotiating assistance took place several weeks before October 17th, 2013, when a coordinated RCMP raid against an anti-shale gas encampment resulted in 40 arrests.

In both their communications with 5th CDSB, the Warrior Society would claim that military negotiating assistance was their right, based on a centuries-old treaty signed between the British Crown and the Mi'kmaq nation. Each request, however, was subsequently refused by the Canadian Armed Forces.

The military internal documents acquired by the Halifax Media Co-op also show that during the course of a key September, 2013, meeting between the Warrior Society and staff at 5th CDSB Gagetown, the military initiated communication with the Assembly of First Nations Chiefs in New Brunswick (AFNCNB). The AFNCNB, the incorporated body that oversees consultative activities for numerous First Nations reservations in New Brunswick, instructed the military by telephone that the Warrior Society did not represent any First Nations peoples in New Brunswick; the implication being to not take their request for negotiating assistance with the RCMP with any degree of seriousness.

This, despite the fact that Chief and Council of Elsipogtog First Nation – who themselves were signed into the AFNCNB's consultative 'umbrella' at the time – had formally requested the assistance of the Warrior Society as far back as June, 2013. Formalizing the request in writing, Chief and Council had signed a Band Council Resolution (BCR) to this effect.

That the AFNCNB was taking multiple thousands of dollars from Southwestern Energy Resources Canada (SWN), the Texas-based company who had obtained the licence to explore for shale gas on over one million hectares of New Brunswick, is well documented.

Knowing that on October 17th, 2013, one of the largest inter-provincial deployments of RCMP officers in recent history was to take place against an anti-shale gas blockade in nearby Rexton, New Brunswick, these two requests – and their subsequent refusal – bear detailed examination.

The First Request:

According to the internal documents we have obtained, the first Warrior Society request for military assistance came on the afternoon of July 28th, 2013. The prior evening, July 27th, had seen a heated and protracted stand-off, deep in the Kent County, New Brunswick, woods, between local activists and the Mi'kmaq Warrior Society on one side, and the RCMP and SWN workers on the other. A crossroads deep in an unpopulated cut-block had been the scene of an eight hour blockade, where negotiations between the RCMP and activists had seriously deteriorated.

On the afternoon of July 28th, returning to the scene of the previous evening's blockade, “a few dozen protesters” as well as “approximately 12 RCMP officers” – according to the documents – once again stood face to face.

At this point, a representative of the Warrior Society, whose name has been redacted from the documents but who has since been identified as Warrior Society 'General' Jim Pictou, first contacted Master Corporal MacLeod, a military police officer from 5th CDSB Gagetown.

During the phone call, the Master Corporal noted that Pictou “alleged that the RCMP have created several issues, including assaulting and arresting numerous FN [First Nation] mbrs, therefore FN mbrs are no longer willing to cooporate (sic) with RCMP.”

Further, MacLeod noted that Pictou “stated that according to the 1752 Treaty, if negotiation measures fail with the Federal Government, FN have the right to request the British or Canadian military provide a negotiator.”

Communication between the Warrior Society and 5th CDSB was subsequently passed to the commanding officer of Gagetown's military police, Captain Dupuis. In a subsequent conversation, Dupuis noted that Pictou told him that there were over “200 RCMP members currently located at Salmon River Road”, the current site of the standoff, and that the RCMP had arrested or assaulted approximately 30 first nations women on the 27th.

In fact there had been no arrests on the evening of the 27th. Pictou tells the Halifax Media Co-op that his mention of the 30 arrested first nations women was misinterpreted and was made in reference to the events of June 21st, 2013, where twelve activists were arrested and an elder from Elsipogtog First Nation had her mouth bloodied, allegedly by RCMP officers.

Captain Dupuis then wrote that Pictou told him that “FN mbrs are on route to Big Cove [Elispogtog] First Nation to provide manpower, including protecting their land at “any cost.””

Further, Pictou then stated that “he will match the number of the RCMP on ground with additional FN members and would not hesitate to challenge them.”

Contact was then established between Dupuis and Inspector Kevin Leahy of the RCMP's Shale Gas Unit in New Brunswick. Leahy informed Dupuis that the current situation was under control.

Later in the evening of July 28th, Captain Dupuis was provided direction by his superior officers. According to the documents, they instructed him that “any further calls from ___ (Pictou) should be directed to RCMP J division, as RCMP are the lead agency and there is no CAF involvement.”

The actual email sent to Dupuis from his superiors has been redacted, but it does not currently appear as though the Warrior Society request for negotiating assistance went to any other federal or provincial department, such as Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development. It appears as though the decision to refuse their request was a decision made exclusively at 5th CDSB Gagetown, with input from the RCMP.

Curiously, however, after this conversation, from July 29th, 2013, until the end of September, 2013, SWN would completely halt its work in Kent County.

The second request:

The second Warrior Society request for assistance took place on September 12th, 2013. At this point, nine or ten (numbers vary in the documents obtained) members of the Warrior Society drove onto 5th CDSB Gagetown, again requesting the assistance of the Canadian Armed Forces in negotiations with the RCMP. This interaction took place during a summer lull in protest activity.

Three high ranking members of the Warrior Society, in the documents identified as Suzanne Patles, Jim Pictou and an individual whose name has been redacted, were subsequently interviewed by Captain Genevieve Therrien. Again, the Warrior Society informed Therrien that under the Treaty of 1752, they had a right to request assistance with the Canadian military if negotiations with the Federal Government failed. Therrien took notes on the situation and then excused herself to “make some phone calls”.

While Patles, Pictou and a third member of the Warrior Society waited and began to file written statements, Therrien contacted Base Command, along with the RCMP. A few minutes later, for reasons that are not indicated, the AFNCNB was also contacted.

The initial contact at the AFNCNB was made to Stuart Gilby, a non-Indigenous legal advisor in its employ. Gilby alerted 5th CDSB Gagetown that the New Brunswick “regional rep for the Council, happened to be in Fredericton and would like to help resolving the situation.”

According to Therrien's notes, Division Command then contacted the regional representative of the AFNCNB, whose name has been redacted, who then informed the military that the Mi'kmaq Warrior Society “was not representing FN [First Nations] and had no authority to represent on behalf of FN as the Warrior Chief is not an elected chief.”

Therrien then returned to the interrogation room. In her notes, she informed the Society representatives that “there was nothing I could do more to help them.”

Despite repeated requests for comment, no response has been forthcoming from the AFNCNB.

Several emails detailing the events, along with a 'Ministerial Advisory', were subsequently sent from 5th CDSB to representatives of the Canadian Navy, Airforce, numerous addresses at the Department of National Defence headquarters, as well as the Public Affairs department in Washington, D.C.

Was the Mi'kmaq Warrior Society representative?

In answering this question, Jim Pictou tells the Halifax Media Co-op that the assistance of the Warrior Society was formally requested by Chief and Council of Elsipogtog First Nation, and that this request exists in a formal 'Band Council Resolution', dated from late June, 2013. For the AFNCNB to then tell 5th CDSB Gagetown that the Warrior Society is “not representative”, is, to Pictou, flat wrong.

“We got asked to come up to the reserve there (Elsipogtog First Nation), and got requested by their Chief, who was a representative of the Indian Act and the Crown,” says Pictou. “They asked us, and we have it in writing that they wanted us there. We were being represented by a Chief who was operating in the AFNCNB. So whoever was sitting there at the Assembly of New Brunswick Chiefs? They were in the wrong by saying that we don't have a voice. Because we did.”

At a packed community hall meeting in Elsipogtog First Nation on June 22nd, 2013, when the Warrior Society was first introduced to the reservation to come and assist in the anti-shale gas struggle, I witnessed the Society being greeted by cheers and a standing ovation from hundreds of community members.

Pictou continues:

“When we all went up there, it was like a parade. They applauded us in, we all shook Chief and council's hands. The elders were there, and they all welcomed us with open arms. They put us up in a house and had us take a look at all their grounds. To me, we were requested. And our War Chief has a copy of a BCR, requesting us. That's why we knew we had that to stand on, because we knew we were being represented by that Chief.”

Susan Levi-Peters, former Chief of Elsipogtog First Nation (2004-2008), confirms that the Warrior Society was requested by community members from Elsipogtog, as well as Chief and Council.

“The women and the people of Elsipogtog, the community, asked for the Warriors to come in because nobody was protecting us from the abuses of the RCMP,” says Levi-Peters. “The Warriors are not elected. They don't have a political stance. But they are being called for by the people.”

Did the Warrior Society have a right to military assistance under the Treaty of 1752?

The Treaty of 1752, signed on the shores of the Shubenacadie River in central Nova Scotia, is a legally binding document that has been ratified by the Canadian Supreme Court. It has been successfully used in a legal setting to secure hunting and fishing rights.

Importantly, access to the Treaty of 1752 is for all Mi'kmaq. Prior, successful, legal challenges have come from individuals seeking recourse against Crown law, not from Indian Act representatives, such as reservation Chiefs and Councils, or the incorporated bodies that they form of their own accord, such as the AFNCNB.

For the AFNCNB to instruct the Canadian Armed Forces that Jim Pictou and the Mi'kmaq Warrior Society were not representative of any other First Nations people, or that they weren't elected, hence unimportant, is arguably to deny these individuals their treaty rights. This goes beyond the purview of the AFNCNB, as legal precedent has shown that these treaty rights are self-contained within the individual and are not concentrated within the Indian Act or its representatives.

Says Pictou:

“The Treaty of 1752 speaks to individual rights to act on. That right is not an Indian Act right for the band to control, it's our own individual rights. It's a peace treaty, where if the Queen obeys the rules of our land, we'll have no problems. When the Queen signed it, she said would protect the First Nation people, the Mi'kmaq First Nation, from any intruders or any violations under her government. So that's why I called on the Queen. Because with the Queen's help, she should be able to come down and negotiate with our land rights. And underneath the treaty, you're supposed to sign it and obey it. Underneath the law, we have the right to act individually on it.”

A Treaty-based request for military negotiating assistance against the RCMP was certainly a novel and untested application. But if, as the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP is currently investigating, the RCMP in New Brunswick failed to balance their various mandates, which include the protection of Aboriginal rights, did they then disqualify themselves as a representative of the Crown?

At what point could the RCMP be justifiably perceived as simply being hired escorts for SWN's seismic testing? New Brunswickers had, after all, petitioned by the tens of thousands to demand a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in their province.

Says Pictou:

“The RCMP were representing the opposition of the people. All these years they're always watching over the people. But when they sub-contracted themselves out, and were no longer just working for the Crown, they violated the Treaty. Underneath the Treaty, you can only work for one Crown, not your choice of who you feel like protecting today. Because otherwise, we could just hire the RCMP if we wanted to.”

The Canadian Armed Forces, as of press time, has not provided a comment for this piece. If and when comment from the CAF is made, we will update this article and make it available in its entirety.

Miles Howe is the author of 'Debriefing Elsipogtog – The Anatomy of a Struggle', available through Fernwood Publishing.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.