Profile image
By RedState (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Donald Trump Tries To Backtrack After Insulting Iowa Voters As Brain-Damaged Corn-Huffers

Thursday, October 22, 2015 13:10
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

trump tweets iowans have brain damage

“Will this be the gaffe that finally sinks Donald Trump” has been a popular parlor game for some months now, and while polling shows that Trump is accumulating unfavorables and hard-core opponents in Iowa and seems to be stalling in persuading any additional supporters, his long-awaited collapse in the polls has yet to materialize and increasingly looks like it is more likely to be a gradual bleed than the implosion of a supernova. Thus, Trump has survived insulting Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) 50%‘s war service, badly misunderstanding Christianity, making crude remarks about Megyn Kelly, going full 9/11 Truther, and repeatedly embracing far-left-wing talking points and positions on a whole host of issues.

But in all Trump’s feuds, smack-talking and insults, the one thing he had not done previously was insult the voters. Until today:

“@mygreenhippo #BenCarson is now leading in the #polls in #Iowa. Too much #Monsanto in the #corn creates issues in the brain? #Trump #GOP”

Now, if you’re not real familiar with Twitter, this is not Trump’s own words – he is quoting, with apparent approval for his audience of 4.6 million Twitter followers, a tweet by a Twitter user named @mygreenhippo whose Twitter bio links to the website, a link I dare not click on to find out what it leads to. But leave aside who the original tweeter is (two weeks ago Trump retweeted a Dutch white supremacist, which is sadly characteristic of a small but extraordinarily vocal subset of his online fans) – I’m quite sure that Trump pays no attention to the identity of people tweeting at him, and while doing so would be the wiser course, it’s not really his responsibility to investigate.

But Trump rather clearly was endorsing the sentiment: that Carson pulling ahead of him 28-20 in one poll (the latest Quinnipiac Iowa poll, the first Iowa poll in three weeks) means that something is wrong with Iowa voters, who have therefore earned a vintage Trump put-down. If you think insulting the voters of Iowa is no small deal, ask former Iowa Congressman Bruce Braley, whose bid for the Senate last year was dramatically upended by video of him deriding Chuck Grassley as an Iowa farmer. Or ask Scott Walker, who in March fired strategist Liz Mair over tweets critical of Iowa’s caucus and voters that predated her hiring by Walker. Maybe Trump genuinely shares this level of scorn for Iowans – the man’s a Manhattan real estate mogul, after all, and his speaking style suggests a man who believes he is always putting one over on you – but just as likely, he was just slipping into his typical pattern of handing out schoolyard insults to anyone who disresepects The Donald.

Moreover, the tweet in question showcases a second of Trump’s unsavory characteristics, his tendency to embrace any old conspiracy theory, in this case fear of Monsanto-produced GMOs, a popular bugaboo on the anti-science Left. Smearing the voters and diving into the left-wing fever swamps is an impressive twofer.

Perhaps recognizing that this was a disastrously poor decision, Trump – who is famous for never apologizing for anything – three hours later offered the closest to an apology he is likely to deliver in this campaign:

The young intern who accidentally did a Retweet apologizes.

Now, while many politicians do indeed have interns tweeting, Trump has rather clearly been doing his own, unfiltered and in his own distinctive voice, for years now, and has given off every indication in interviews that he’s the man with his finger on the Tweet button. Maybe the tweet was an intern’s tweet, maybe not, and maybe the “apologizes” is intentionally tongue-in-cheek a la Monty Python, but characteristically, Trump won’t take responsibility directly for anything.

Maybe the more interesting question is whether we will see more of this kind of reaction as more bad polling news arrives in the future. As Noah Rothman notes, Trump’s campaign message at this point is hugely dependent on bragging about the polls, such that bad polling news could feed on itself and undermine the whole basis of his appeal:

Much of Trump’s extemporaneous stump speeches focus on his roost at the top of polls of Republican primary voters. He contends ad nauseam that the United States is in decline and does not “win anymore.” You’re expected to accept the premise and choose not to ask for specifics about what has been lost in the ill-defined contest. “We’ll have so much winning, you’ll get bored with winning,” Trump adorably quipped…Tragically for Trump, however, he might soon be robbed of his claim to be the bearer of endless victories. This leads us to the big question: Can the Donald Trump campaign endure a loss?

Jeb strategist Mike Murphy – even discounting for his obvious self-interest – makes a similar point:

[N]othing changes like momentum from polling. I often joke that if I ever had the horrible, malicious job of being Head of the PRC’s Intelligence Service and they said, “All right, here’s $20 billion, screw around with the U.S,” one of the first things I’d go do is bribe media pollsters. because you totally control the thinking of the D.C. press corps based on polls. Right now, if four polls had come out saying Trump at seven and Jeb at 29, all the media commentary—without either guy changing a thing they’re doing—would be the exact opposite. Well, Jeb’s low-key style is clearly resonating with voters, it’s exactly what people are looking for, I can just hear it now. Well, Trump’s bombastic style clearly has backfired, we could see… And by the way, the same people would be totally comfortable completely switching their opinions in a minute because most of them are lemmings to these, in my view, completely meaningless national polls.

And the Iowa polls can certainly shift – we’re still a little over three months out from the caucuses, and three months ago this was where the RCP poll averages stood there:

Walker 18.8
Bush 9.0
Paul 8.5
Trump 8.5
Carson 8.3
Huckabee 7.5
Cruz 7.3
Rubio 6.8
Santorum 4.3

Today, Walker is out, and Jeb, Paul, Huckabee and Santorum are down to less than half their poll averages from late July. In 2012, when the Iowa Caucuses were a month earlier (January 3), Herman Cain was over 30 in the RCP average in late October, Newt Gingrich was at 31 on December 11, and on December 26, 2011, Rick Santorum stood in sixth place at 7.7% of the vote. Yet Santorum won. And if Iowa polls are dicey and volatile, national and later-state polls are even more useless, in part because they are affected by what happens in Iowa and New Hampshire. The Washington Post’s “Past Frontrunners” list notes the national poll standing at this point of the race of some past frontrunners who went on to lose:

2004: Wesley Clark +5
2008 (D): Hillary Clinton +27.3
(R): Rudy Giuliani +9.2
2012: Herman Cain +0.5

And look at what happened in the South Carolina polls in 2012 after Iowa and then New Hampshire:

2012 SC RCP

Here, there are reasons to think more bad news in Iowa may be headed Trump’s way, which could wash out the last 0.7 points of his lead in the RCP average in Iowa. Rothman notes that Iowa is the one place where Trump actually has negative ads running against him, a $1 million Club for Growth ad campaign (I noted last month that the Summer of Trump poll surge was partly dependent on the fact that nobody was in the field running ads yet). And organizing is key in Iowa, yet Trump is the only candidate in the race who hasn’t even bothered to purchase a voter file, and his “campaign has spent more on hats and T-shirts than on field staff members in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.” So likely-voter screens alone may sap his standing as the polling grows more rigorous. The most respected gold-standard Iowa pollster, J. Ann Selzer’s DeMoines Register poll, will be announcing the results of another Iowa poll Friday, and if it similarly shows Trump out of the lead, it will bear watching if he has another spasm of lashing out at the voters.

The post Donald Trump Tries To Backtrack After Insulting Iowa Voters As Brain-Damaged Corn-Huffers appeared first on RedState.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 3 comments
  • The truth of words are not determined by who said them. Words are not extensions of people. Words are the same no matter who says them, therefore they are above judgement in relation to the mouth that utters them. In simpler terms, it doesn’t matter who the original person is who says something…if it’s truthful or false, it remains such. You cannot say, “Oh that’s false and unacceptable because a white supremacist said it.” You cannot judge the words base on the reputation of the person who said them. Words must be judged upon their own merit and the facts.

    And no, this is certainly not the thing that sinks Trump. Try harder next time.

    • Darn…I forgot to mention that you are simply making it look like Trump said this. He did not. A repost or re-Tweet does not constitute agreement or promotion. Perhaps they just felt it was something that should be seen or read. I forward and retweet such things myself, often out of personal shock. I’m not naive enough to really believe that, as I’m sure he probably does think it’s outrageous that Carson is polling ahead of him and quite honestly I think it’s ridiculous and untruthful myself as well, but still, don’t insinuate that he said this…as he technically did not.

  • Hi Greg Erickson of Redstaate whom got FIRED.Sorry I see right through your shenanigans. I know full well you have had it out for Trump.So heres some facts for you: I saw the Original tweet that was RE-TWEETED and the username of the idiot behind it is a SOCIALIST & a Bernie fan so no one is going to blame Bernie now?
    You know Bernie whom is trying to win Iowa?
    Will he come out and apologize for one of his own supporters whom “insulted” Iowans.I see your “manipulative” tactics so frequently used by the Media by the way…trying to say “Trump tries to”.
    No ….he didnt “try” . He did.Being so swamped he hired an intern to help re-tweet.He or she didnt check further into the USERNAME of the tweeter and had she done so would have seen right away a BERNIE supporter whom by the way , many of which troll , photoshop fake PREVIOUS tweets of Donalds -even fabricating statements on posters, which he never said.They are some very vicious and malicious trolls.
    As for Iowa.One poll does not reveal the whole WHOLE picture (another deception used greatly). These were a few hundred 80 year olds and a poll arranged by Club For Growth.
    I guarantee you will see many , many other Polls in Iowa when combined together show a completely different picture.Trump dominates and continues to dominate.
    Carsons venues arent packed 4,000, 5,000, 8,000 deep with thousands more outside in overflow crowds-every single place he goes..
    And those are the SMALLER crowds by the way.Doral Florida tomorrow is bracing for over 10,000.
    Here this was last night:
    FULL OF WOMEN… whom love Donald:

    I see you missed this very important Part of the Poll: ( perhaps deliberately just like the media)
    Trump on the ECONOMY: (which does matter to women by the way) 41-12 (Carson)
    Trump on Taxes 32-13 (Carson)
    Trump on Illegal Immigration 37-9 (Carson)

    and while we are at it . perhaps a reality check is needed of one poll across MANY polls:
    OCT 19
    JJ Adams ‏@jjadamsny888  1h
    NBC poll shows 59% GOP voters see themselves supporting @realDonaldTrump We’re way past tipping point! #Trump2016 #TrumpTrain #tcot #ccot

    OCT 20
    Trump 2016 News ‏@Trump2016News  5h
    NEW Morning Consult poll: Trump 40% Carson 14 Bush 6 Cruz/Rubio 5 1 week ago: Trump 34 Carson 20 Bush 9 Fiorina/Cruz/Rubio 5 #Trump2016

    The Majority Awakens ‏@DefendingtheUSA  4h
    NEW Monmouth Poll! Trump 28% Carson 18% Cruz 10% Rubio 6% Carly 6% Bush 5% -Phone poll that SHOULD be covered by MSM

    Trumplican ‏@Tea4Freedom  55m
    192 polls from 32 pollsters: Trump 29.4%, Carson 21.7%,The rest evaporating! … via @pollster #Trump2016

    59% YES.
    36 % NO.


    OCT 20
    Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump  9h
    New poll by ABC News/Washington Post TRUMP 32 CARSON 22 RUBIO 10 BUSH 7 Wow, how will the media put a negative spin on this one?

    Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump  10h
    Just out: Boston Herald/Franklin Pierce Poll N.H. TRUMP 28 (up 10) CARSON 16 BUSH 9 RUBIO 6 CRUZ 5 Press will say they are surging!

    Donald Trump 2016 ‏@VoteDonald2016  14m
    ABC news/Washington Post poll: TRUMP: 42% CARSON: 16% BUSH: 13% RUBIO: 11% Everybody else irrelevant. #Trump2016
    TRUMP 43 %
    CARSON 16%

    TRUMP 47.3
    HILARY 43.6

    George Henry ‏@georgehenryw  39m
    Oct 20th Reuters #GOP Trump 32% Carson 16% Bush 9% Rubio 6% Cruz 5% Fiorina 5% Huck 4% Kasich 3%

    RMO ‏@BlueSkyNJ  41m
    Massachusetts Poll – Donald Trump Laps Entire Field With 48%…

    Elisabeth ‏@10thAmendment  29m
    Recent Polling: ABC National
    32% MA – 48% SC – 36% NV – 38% CT – 34% NH – 32% FL – 28% OH – 23% PA – 23% NC – 28% IA – 24%

    IOWA….24% .Nationally.
    In the LEAD.


Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.