| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
JUDGE ANNA VON REITZ ASKING DIRECT QUESTIONS ABOUT OUR GOLD. WAITING KAREN HUDES REPLY.
Sunday, December 20, 2015 12:23
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Dear Karen Hudes,
Thank you for your prompt reply. I think we are playing from two different sets of facts. To
expedite things and speed up the reset please answer the following questions:
1. Why should gold that is owed to Americans be given to and controlled by foreigners who
have no connection to us but a dishonored service agreement? Bottom line—-why should our
share of the gold be handed over to people who haveno delegated authority to represent us
in this matter at all? You and everyone else can see that this is a legitimate problem —and
not one of my making.
2. Why should we accept such an arrangement as any kind of payment to us?
If you, as a Trustee, give my gold to Jake Down the Road, I’m sorry, Karen, but I still
haven’t been paid and I am still the lawful Beneficiary who is still owed everything I was ever
owed, plusinterest.
3. Why are you insisting that the solvency of the “Federal Reserve Note” is of such critical
importance? The FRN is a private domestic currency—in-house Monopoly money—with a
fixed exchange rate against the actual United States Dollar, which is and has always been
our currency. If the “Federal United States” can’t make it after a hundred years of exchanging
their worthless paper for our silver and gold, that’s their problem. They haven’t bothered to honor
the only contract we have with them —so give us all ten good reasons why there can’t be an
orderly conclusion to our final divorce from the British Empire? Do you think we still need the
British Navy to protect us?
4. Why do you think that the military might of America will “collapse” if we change our maid
service? I have no doubt that the reason General Dempsey avoided your question is that he didn’t
want to tell you out loud that the United States Forces —that is, American Armed Forces—
are quite a different thing than “US Armed Forces”. Without us, Karen, the “US Armed Forces”
pretty much dwindle down to the Puerto Rican Navy and the Home Guard on Guam.
Fortunately for everyone concerned, we are not dependent on the Federal United States. They
are and have always been dependent on us.
5. Gold “backwardation” is just fancy jargon for not enough metal reserves to meet demand
and quell crazy speculation. You want to release the reset to give everyone their fair share of
gold, ease all these tensions and get the world economy flowing again. Understood.
Why not give the American share of the gold to the Americans and get on with it?
General Dunford secures delivery, the gold backs the actual United States Dollar, and all is
right with the world. Tell us why that seems so very difficult?
6. My advice to the Vatican and the Pope and to you is all the same. Give the gold to the
people it is actually owed to and don’t fool around playing politics. Let the people sort things
out for themselves. We don’t have a problem with you giving a fair share to the Puerto Ricans
and the Samoans and all the other people in the Insular States and Haiti and everywhere
else. We are all for it. We simply want our share delivered into our hands and into our control.
Britain has acted as Mommy Dearest for the last time. We have no contractual obligation to
the Brits or the Federal United States related to this matter and you have been notified. That
should be that. And if it isn’t, this is your moment to explain to the whole world why not?
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Submitted by: Wynter Moon, with permission of Judge Anna von Reitz.
