Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

News of Major Revolution Will Never Be in Your Twitter Feed – Will Be Totally Censored

Friday, February 12, 2016 13:29
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

DOJ

In the following video, the narrator discusses a topic that is becoming all to familiar to some Americans.  Luke Rudkowski talks about the shocking and sad news with twitter’s new algorithm and trust and safety council that will be used to censor any critical voices on the once free platform. He refers to what he calls the “Death of Twitter.” Much like Facebook, and other social mediums Rudkowski explains how Twitter is no longer interested in what YOU want to get information about. Instead, there are now new ad friendly and brand friendly algorithms that will TELL you what you should be interested in. 

If your interests happen to align with those that are not liberal, expect to get your account suspended or thrown in Twitter Gulag as it’s called for some indefinite amount of time. Keep in mind, Twitter’s suspension ban, and locking notifications do not inform users which rule they have supposedly broken, instead simply stating that the user has somehow impinged on the the terms of service. Finding out the reason an account has been punished is generally impossible. If you openly favor conservative ideals like pro-life, the Second Amendment, or criticize the government’s violation of the Constitution, expect your posts to be censored heavily, or your account banned all together. 

The following are just a few links to some of the articles mentioned in the video.

How Will Twitters New Relevancy Over Recency Algorithm Affect Brands.

Twitters New Algorithm Raises De-Democratization Fears

Twitters New Trust and Safety Council is a Desperate Measure for Desperate Times

Safety Council Makes a Mockery of Free Speech

Twitters Second Biggest Shareholder, Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

seenlife

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

Everywhere you look, Free Speech is being annihilated. Not only are companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google, censoring you, they are reporting you to new gestapo forces being formed by Obama’s lawless Attorney General. the following video breaks down how Twitter is now working to make sure “Free Speech” is what they say it is, and then below learn what else is going on. By Comparison, Twitter is behind everyone else. 

Death of Twitter – PAY ATTENTION!

SUBSCRIBE TO  THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK IN THE NEWSLETTER HERE

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

To anyone not paying close attention to the standoff in Oregon, you probably would have no way to know this, but the FBI Was Hard At Work Throughout the Duration of the Siege Attempting to Shut Down All Forms of Alternative Media From Getting Information out of Burns, OregonThe FBI want THEIR version of the story, no matter how factually flawed, to be the only version of the story. What most Americans have yet to realize, is you only have the rights guaranteed to you under the Bill of Rights if they are not an inconvenience for the government to let you have them. Otherwise, using the barrel of gun, your rights are unconstitutionally revoked. 

Listen to the video below. In a shocking phone call recorded by Youtuber Professor Doom, Professor Doom called the local Verizon store in Burns, Oregon where Pete Santilli allegedly bought a Wi-Fi Hotspot to broadcast from. Rumor had it that the FBI had been inquiring about information without a warrant, so Professor Doom called the Verizon Store and asked a store manager if the FBI really did call there as had been reported. The response he got was SHOCKING! Not only did the store get a call from the FBI, but the call that came from the FBI was NOT to the Verizon store’s general number!!! It was to a personal cell phone of someone working at the store. I won’t even speculate on how they got that number, or how they knew whose cell phone to call… but use your imagination. When Professor Doom speaks to the person who was actually received the call on their personal cell phone… wait until you hear what the girl said…

FBI Calling Personal Cell Phones to Silence Alt Media

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

At the same time the FBI Was Attempting to Shut Down All Alternative Media Coming From Burns, Oregon Standoff, social media giants like Facebook and Google were MASSIVELY censoring users. Any Facebook user caught spreading information or live broadcasts from the refuge were banned from Facebook for three to seven days. Let me say that again: Facebook was banning people from using Facebook for spreading news or options about the news that were not in favor of the FBI. What the hell kind of a country are we turning into? Personally, in January, I was suspended roughly 23 of the 29 days after the siege begun for spreading factual information. 

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

seenlife

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

At some point after the  Shocking New Secrets on the FBI-Sanctioned Assassination of LaVoy Finicum (Video) came out, Blackhawk military helicopters were seen circling over the refuge, while the FBI did it’s best to Continue to Shut Down All Forms of Alternative Media Coming From Burns, Oregon Standoff, Perhaps that was intended to intimidate law abiding Americans trying to accurately report what was REALLY happening. It’s unclear whether a state of Martial Law was declared in Burns or not, but reporters claimed there were Massive Numbers of Unmarked Heavily Armed Paramilitary Units Operating in Burns, Oregon, Presumed to be Mercenaries. If they were FBI or some other federal agency, why no markings? 

In addition to the long list of attempts to silence free speech by Obama, the Pentagon’s New “Law of War” Manual  Was Updated to “Reduce the US Army to the Level of Nazis.” Sound harsh? What would you call giving the military that is not supposed to be policing citizens on American soil in the first place the ability to shoot unarmed people protesting the government or even kill Journalists Under Their New Classification known as ‘Belligerents’ Who Can Be Shot on Sight Simply for Reporting the Truth? Have you stopped to ask yourself why Obama is so scared of Free Speech? Check out the video below, and then the actual statutes making it
“legal” for the Army to ventilate unarmed civilians.  

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

The following is the actual united States Code (U.S.C.) that authorizes what you just heard; 

Dave Hodges of the Common Sense Show points very specifically to the code I just mentioned. There is no ”CONSPIRACY THEORY” here, this is the UNITED STATES CODE!

On the surface, the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) act should prevent the Army from deploying the troops in the midst of a protest that is not on the scale of something like the 1992 LA Riots. However, the Army claims exemption from Posse Comitatus in the four following areas. 

10 USC 331. When a state is unable to control domestic violence and they have requested federal assistance, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.

10 USC 332. When ordinary enforcement means are unworkable due to unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States, use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.

10 USC 333. When a state cannot or will not protect the constitutional rights of the citizens, due to domestic violence or conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.

House Joint Resolution 1292. This resolution directs all departments of the U.S. government, upon request of the Secret Service, to assist in carrying out its statutory duties to protect government officials and major political candidates from physical harm.

With regard to 10 USC 331, if the local authorities have lost control in the midst of a profound display of domestic violence (e.g. LA Riots), most Americans support the use of National Guard or the military.  However, in 10 USC 332, 333 and House Joint Resolution 1292 are ripe with exceptions which open the door to federal authorities abusing the public for exercising their Constitutional right to protest.

In 10 USC 332, the phrase “unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States, use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized,” permits the federal government from being demonstrated against. An act of demonstration, or the most benign demonstrations of civil disobedience gives the government the authority to take “deadly action” against the public  because there are no clear distinctions on when the use of lethal and nonlethal force is appropriate.

In 10 USC 333, any disruption of federal law can be decisively dealt with by the federal government. The phrase “…conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized” is a telling passage of this Army document.

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

seenlife

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

My personal favorite is the party about peaceful protestors protesting the government can be ventilated: 

“An act of demonstration, or the most benign demonstrations of civil disobedience gives the government the authority to take “deadly action” against the public  because there are no clear distinctions on when the use of lethal and nonlethal force is appropriate.”

Yell “Conspiracy Theorist” all you want. The actual law can be read with your own two eyes in the Unites States Code… LOOK IT UP! (10 U.S. Code § 332)

Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO  THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK IN THE NEWSLETTER HERE

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

As crazy as it sounds, Facebook has gotten much more malevolent with how it treats it’s users’ data. We know as far back as 2014, Facebook Tinkered With Users’ Feeds For a Massive Psychology Experiment, to see what affects they could have on their users. In an article from AV Club, it said:

Scientists at Facebook have published a paper showing that they manipulated the content seen by more than 600,000 users in an attempt to determine whether this would affect their emotional state. The paper, “Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks,” was published in The Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences. It shows how Facebook data scientists tweaked the algorithm that determines which posts appear on users’ news feeds—specifically, researchers skewed the number of positive or negative terms seen by randomly selected users. 

Facebook then analyzed the future postings of those users over the course of a week to see if people responded with increased positivity or negativity of their own, thus answering the question of whether emotional states can be transmitted across a social network. 

Result: They can! Which is great news for Facebook data scientists hoping to prove a point about modern psychology. It’s less great for the people having their emotions secretly manipulated.

What about the “unintended consequences of that experiment? Are we supposed to believe that someone who wasn’t already depressed and then pushed farther didn’t have some type of adverse reaction in their lives they wish they could have over again? Next time without puppetmaseter Zuckerberg behind the curtain. My God, it should come as no shock that he’s Rockefeller’s grandson, the way he tries to play God. Like Twitter, Facebook has “volunteered” to Help Security Services Identify Potential “Terrorists,” never defining of course who a “terrorist” is. By many people in Washington D.C.’s standards, the following are terrorists:

Extreme Tea Party

There are several other links to the horribly shady initiatives started by either the Democrats or by Facebook to silence free speech altogether, so for those of you who plan on using the Internet or social media should the time come to rise up, might I suggest a cup and some string. You’re likely to get more accomplished that way! Below are also two older examples of Twitter censoring conservatives… only, not little ones like you and I, but household names… on accident.

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

Blood of Tyrants

THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE! 

WND REPORTS:

Twitter – the social media company that was just in the news for a shares’ loss of nearly 20 percent – is now under fire for perceived censorship of conservative viewpoints.

Noted conservative author and commentator Michelle Malkin picked up a thread that was making rounds on the social media site, writing in a tweet of her own: “Conservative Twitter users raising troubling questions whether @Twitter’s new ‘quality filter’ is censoring based on ideology.”

The remark was retweeted and favorited a combined 1,000-plus times. And among commenters was this one, from Milo Yiannopoulos: “It is.”

Another wrote: “I’m not even remotely surprised.”

The “quality filter” Malkin referenced came from the company’s announced new policy, as reported by Tech Crunch: “Quality filtering aims to remove all Tweets from your notifications timeline that contain threats, offensive or abusive language, duplicate content or are sent from suspicious accounts.”

But that policy is being applied in a seemingly biased manner, Malkin suggested, after her Twitter feed picked up a story of a suspended user, Doug Ernst, who writes for the Washington Times.

Ernst writes on his blog, under the heading of “Twitter: Death threats get a pass, but users who question that decision will be suspended,” in a recent post:  “Twitter CEO Dick Costolo said earlier this year he was “ashamed” and “embarrassed” at how the company deals with bullying. Apparently they haven’t made much progress, because these days Twitter allows death threats to slide. Worse, if you’ve been the target of a death threat and you question how on earth the user responsible can get away with it, then Twitter Support will ban you. I know from first-hand experience.”

Ernst recounts how he posted on Twitter a link to a Washington Times story he wrote, and soon after received a tweet from a follower, Derrick Tapscott, saying: “@WashTimes @douglasernst WE WILL FIND YOU & KILL YOU #DEATHTOAMERICA.”

Ernst questioned Twitter about the email and received a generic response, also posted on his blog.

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

seenlife

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

“We were unable to take action on the account given that we could not determine a clear violation of the Twitter rules,” part of the response reads.

Shortly after, Ernst posted his outrage on Twitter: “Some guy says he’s going to hunt me down and kill me, yet @twitter ‘could not determine a clear violation’ of its rules. Unreal …”

In a phone conversation, Ernst said it was “literally seconds” after he posted that tweet that Twitter suspended his account. That was April 6 and since, he’s been involved in a lengthy campaign with Twitter officials to have his suspension lifted, or at the least, to receive an explanation why his account was suspended, but not the one belonging to the poster who made the death threat. He’s written Twitter at least three times to seek clarification, but to no avail.

He’s also enlisted and received the help of others with social media savvy to press Twitter for the same information, and account re-activation.

In an email to WND, Ernst said: “If Twitter is willing to blatantly ignore a writer for a well-known newspaper like The Washington Times, how does the company respond to Joe and Jane American who might not have social media managers and others working on their behalf? … It seems like the lesson Twitter is trying to send with this suspension and its behavior is ‘Don’t you dare expose the man behind the curtain, or you will pay.’”

Ernst hasn’t concluded Twitter suspended his account due to his conservative background, which includes employment at the Heritage Foundation. But others are seeing partisan censorship at play – and the concerns have reached the point where even Malkin stepped into the fray and kicked off a Twitter campaign to similarly wonder.

Ernst also said, via email: “Twitter gets to put out press statements on how it’s working to mitigate online bullying or terror threats, but when someone with a decent-sized megaphone calls the company out on its woeful performance, then he must be silenced. The past three weeks have felt like something out of a Twilight Zone episode.”

Twitter, meanwhile, has just taken a hit of another kind – financially.

CNBC reported on a leaked earnings report just this week that indicated the company’s shares fell 18 percent based on disappointing first quarter earnings. The company’s adjusted earnings for the quarter were 7 cents per share on $436 million in revenues.

IT’S TIME FOR THE ADULTS TO TAKE THE COUNTRY BACK!

MADISON

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

THE WEEK REPORTS:

Conservative Twitter users unleashed their fury Sunday night, after the social networking giant suspended the account of Chris Loesch, the husband of right-wing Breitbart.com and CNN pundit Dana Loesch. His account was disabled following a heated exchanged with some liberal Twitter users — proof, he believes, of left-leaning Tweeps gaming the site’s policies to censor conservatives. Does his theory hold water? Here, a brief guide: 

What started this Twitter spat?

Chris Loesch and his wife were engaging in a war of words with several antagonistic Twitter users on Sunday night after an alarming, vile tweet was directed at Dana. (The tweet, from a little-known freelancer, read, “@dloesch is one of the few women on this planet that if I learned she’d been brutally raped and murdered I wouldn’t shed a tear.”) Soon after the exchange, Chris Loesch was suspended. Fellow conservatives like Ben Howe, Jerome Hudson, and Michelle Malkin promptly began sending tweets with the “#FreeChrisLoesch” hashtag. Soon, the hashtag was among the top 10 trending topics in the U.S. His account was re-instated on Monday afternoon, according to BuzzFeed.

Why was Loesch suspended?

Many conservatives believe that liberals, fed up with being called out for their bullying, banded together to report Loesch’s Twitter account as spam, says Ed Morrissey at Hot Air. Twitter has a self-policing “Block & Report Spam” function, which suspends accounts that receive complaints from other users. Loesch claims to have “stumbled upon a few tweets between the liberals I was debating” that discussed their plan to have him blocked. “This is clearly a tactic being used by the Left, and Twitter is either ignorant or allowing it to occur.” 

Could that really have happened?

Loesch’s is a dubious theory, conservative columnist Brady Cremeens says. Why would liberal Twitter users target him instead of his wife, who has a much higher public profile by virtue of her position on CNN?

Regardless, this isn’t the first accusation of social media’s politicization. Last week, conservatives complained when Free Market America’s Twitter account was briefly suspended, while a Facebook user who routinely posts to pro-Democratic Facebook pages claims that conservative users had him banned from the site by flagging his left-leaning posts as spam.

Why is this a big deal?

If Twitter really does use an algorithm that allows “user accounts to be reactively suspended according to malicious whims,” says Anneke E. Green at The Washington Times, “that’s a threat to free speech for everyone — regardless of individual political views.” Sites like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are increasingly vital parts of the national political conversation and “possess the power to determine what political speech is and is not acceptable for their huge audiences,” says BuzzFeed. It may be time to investigate how fairly and transparently they “wield their clout.” 

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

seenlife

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

 

MORE ON FACEBOOK SHADINESS!

Warning: Facebook Tied To Jade Helm, Artificial Intelligence, and Bilderbergs

What Is Facebook Spying on Now, and How Do I Stay Safe?

You Gave Facebook Messenger Permission To Spy On You Using a Hot Mic (Video)

Facebook Says It Will Help Security Services Identify Potential “Terrorists”

Facebook Now Has a New Way They Will Be Targeting Conservative Pages

GOVERNMENT ARRESTING PEOPLE FOR ANTI-OBAMA FACEBOOK POSTS 

Facebook Onboard With Censoring Anti-Obama National Protest Information!

Facebook’s Recent “Experiment” ACTUALLY Beta Testing For How To Influence Future Elections

Rights

OBAMA IS DOING HIS BEST TO SILENCE ANYONE BRINGING TRUTH TO LIGHT:

FBI Attempting to Shut Down Alt Media With Oregon Standoff (Recorded Call)

Pentagon: Journalists Classified as ‘Belligerents’ Who Can Be Shot on Sight

The TPP Has a Secret Clause to Limit Free Speech Online – Shocked?

DOJ Creates Gestapo To Target Americans With “Anti-Government Views”

Disastrous “Net Neutrality” Rules Begin Now (Video)

Could Obama REALLY BE SPYING On 2/3 of ALL Reporters? ABSOLUTELY!

Net Neutrality: What it REALLY Means, & How it REALLY Impacts You

Senator Feinstein (Go Figure) Trying to Take Away First Amendment!                            

Democrats Now Pushing to Regulate “CONSERVATIVE WEBSITES                            

HAD ENOUGH YET? – Democrats’ Push to Criminalize Dissent

 

THE VOICE OF REASON:
   
Website: https://thelastgreatstand.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LastGreatStand
Google + https://plus.google.com/+Thelastgreatstandconspirator/posts
Twitter https://twitter.com/#!/LastGreatStand
Seen.Life http://www.seen.life/profile/21900069-voice-of-reason
Grassfire http://grassfire.com/users/voiceofreason/profile/
Tea Party Community https://www.teapartycommunity.com/profile-151600/
Right.IS http://right.is/contributor/pages/351/169/bio.html

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

seenlife

DONATIONS ACCEPTED VIA PAYPAL TO GET THE RADIO SHOW UP AND RUNNING…

GO TO: WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM TO MAKE A SMALL DONATION

Small

COMING SOON TO INTERNET RADIO!

STAY TUNED!

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

seenlife

LGS

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • Why do we participate in the childish games of Twitter?

    DUMP THEM!

    Don’t use the rich folks products such as Twitter or Facebook and they will have less say so in who we talk to or about what subject.

    Twitter only has the power we give them.

    DUMP TWITTER!

    Their income goes down in flames.

    Seems I remember some American colonist dressed up like Indians DUMPING TEA IN THE BOSTON HARBOR.

    It was called the BOSTON TEA PARTY.

    It happened on December 16, 1773, when the American colonist protested against King George III rule in America.

    Seems we got the same type problems raising their ugly heads in America today.

    Foreign owned corporations, banks, and royalty shoving their opinions down Americans throat.

    People treat us the way we let them treat us.

    The Powers That Be understand 3 things … Money, Power, Control.

    Take away their money by not using their products … they lose power and control.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.