Profile image
By RedState (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

We Don’t Have Any Recent Nevada Polling, and That’s Okay

Monday, February 22, 2016 18:33
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Nevada hasn’t been polled since Valentine’s Day, and it’s been an eternity since then in the Republican race. The debate has happened. South Carolina itself happened. Jeb Bush has dropped out of the race. Trump spent a solid week going full metal truther. Neither of the two polls conducted over Valentine’s Day weekend are worth the paper they are printed on, especially the CNN poll with a 6.5% margin of error.

The result is that we are flying more or less blind into a critically important Nevada caucus – maybe the most important Nevada race that’s ever been. But that’s really okay; the Nevada caucuses are completely impossible to poll accurately in any case, and even if a pollster tries to release a flash poll tomorrow (taken over some combination of Sunday or Monday) it should be automatically disregarded as garbage.

In 2008, two pollsters tried to poll Nevada in what was at that time a relatively static race and both missed the final result by laughable margins. Mason-Dixon, one of the most respected pollsters in the nation, predicted that Romney would get 34%, McCain 19, and Huckabee 13. They missed outside the margin of error for all three candidates as the final result was Romney 51%, McCain 12%, and Huckabee 8%. ARG fared even worse, predicting an absurd (in retrospect) finish of Romney 28, McCain 21, Giuliani 11 (Giuliani ended up with 4%).

In 2012, the two pollsters who attempted to predict the race actually did a decent job of predicting the final level of Romney support at 50%, but both drastically understated the Paul support. Again, however, the Republican race was comparatively stable by this point, and it looked very evident that Romney was ready to run away with Super Tuesday.

Even if polls get released tomorrow, they will do well to match the 2012 performance, which is to say, to accurately predict the winner, who will likely be Trump. The far more important race – the one for second – has been much harder for Nevada pollsters to predict in the Nevada caucuses. That is especially true this year where every race is dominated by late deciders and where the sudden vacuum presented by the absence of Jeb Bush has likely created a decently sized pool of still-undecided voters in Nevada.

So if you have anxiety about what’s happening in Nevada tomorrow, don’t fret; new polls will likely not make it better, if it’s accurate information you’re after. And if one actually is released, we’ll cover it and talk about it here, but just know that you should take it with a very healthy grain of salt.

The post We Don’t Have Any Recent Nevada Polling, and That’s Okay appeared first on RedState.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.