Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
I would listen to these guys.
These ten gentlemen were all, at one time or another, tasked with carrying out a president’s order for launching a nuclear strike. Now, like others before them, they’ve joined together to release a letter opposing a Trump presidency.
These are the guy that have lived dreading that moment that they would have to unleash hell on the world, but emerged with their consciences intact.
In the letter, they voiced their concerns.
“He has shown himself time and again to be easily baited and quick to lash out, dismissive of expert consultation and ill-informed of even basic military and international affairs — including, most especially, nuclear weapons,” the letter states. “Donald Trump should not be the nation’s commander-in-chief. He should not be entrusted with the nuclear launch codes. He should not have his finger on the button.”
The officers said the Republican nominee lacks the “composure, judgment, restraint and diplomatic skill” necessary for any commander in chief to possess.
The letter was organized by Bruce Blair, who says that once Clinton and Trump were running a close race, it dawned on them all that Trump might win, and it scared them to death.
“…it’s very possible that this person, this pathological liar, who lacks self-control, who knows very little about anything and is angry and aggressive, who might lash out with nuclear weapons if he’s elected, could win. That sort of dawned on everyone. We felt we needed to weigh in.”
It sounds as if Blair and his colleagues have been paying attention.
The ten gentlemen, who worked in underground launch centers in places like Cheyenne, Wyoming, Minot, North Dakota, Great Falls, Montana, and Grand Forks, North Dakota have not endorsed Clinton.
They just see Donald Trump as too ignorant to be left in charge of handling something as important as our nuclear weapons.
And they’re right.
The post Trump Can’t Be Trusted With Our Nuclear Codes appeared first on RedState.
Stupid, several committees sit atop the decision to commit to a nuclear action before the decision is brought to the President while all other options have to be considered.
Only one candidate promised in 2008, “If I’m the President, we will attack Iran. And we would be able to totally obliterate them.” Watch her say it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTBdFccqDns
Only one candidate, when senior cabinet officer, destroyed Libya and pillaged its financial resources and natural resources. And laughed about it. “We came. We saw. He died. (insane laugh)”
Watch her say it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y
Only one candidate, when senior cabinet officer, began the genocide against Christians and Alawites in Syria, in 2011, and the conquest of Syria, using proxy forces.
And only one candidate — in Debate 2, October 9 — suggested a no-fly zone to protect those proxy forces, and called the Russian bombardment of them “aggression.”
Russia is in Syria (1) by invitation of the legal –and freely elected– government of Syria
(2) with the authorization of the UN Security Council –including the US, which voted in favor
(3) to destroy a terrorist organization (ISIS) that claims sovereignty over territory inside Russia.
Only one candidate wants to shoot down Russian planes. Which would mean war with Russia.
NATO was formed, supposedly to defend western Europe against the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union ceased to exist 25 years ago. And that is a long time. NATO is actually part of what was originally known as the Pan Europe movement, began in 1922.
In a 1932 book, “Practical Idealism,” the plan to destroy white Christian Europe with immigrants was stated, plainly, by Count Richard N. Coudenhove Kalergi:
“The Eurasian-Negroid race … similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples…Europe, will against its own will … turn Europe into a mixed race of Asians and Negros…”
Only ONE of our candidates supports this genocidal plan. Her husband Bill was a winner of the Charlemagne Prize in 2000, the prize that was first awarded to Kalergi in 1950.