Profile image
By Occidental Dissent
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Marine Le Pen Arrives Unannounced In New York

Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:35
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Marine Le Pen has arrived unannounced in New York:

“French National Front leader Marine Le Pen is in New York on an unannounced visit less than four months before France’s presidential election, according to a senior campaign official.

Le Pen, who leads in the latest opinion poll for the presidency, is making a private visit to New York, her campaign chief of staff, David Rachline, said in a text-message exchange. Donald Trump had no plans to meet with Le Pen, according to an aide to the president-elect, who asked not to be identified without authorization to speak publicly.

“It’s not on her public agenda,” Rachline said, when asked if she planned a meeting with Trump or officials close to him. “We don’t communicate about private visits.” …”

She is clearly on board with the concept of a Northern Alliance:

“PARIS (AP) — France is partnered with the United States and Russia in a global battle against Islamic militants. Francs, not euros, fill the pockets of French citizens. Borders are so secure that illegal immigration no longer fuels fears of terror attacks or drains public coffers. …

“This page in the history of the world is turning. We will give back to the nations reasoned protectionism, economic and cultural patriotism,” she said last Friday at a meeting with the Anglo-American Press Association. She assured such an approach won’t stop a deepening of international ties.

Like Trump, Le Pen, 48, a mother of three and lawyer by training, envisions improved relations with Russia, which she and other National Front officials have visited. But she takes it further.

“I want an alliance to emerge between France, the United States and Russia to fight Islamic fundamentalism because it’s a gigantic danger weighing on our democracies,” she said at a meeting last week with the Anglo-American Press Association.

“Terrorism is a pistol in the hand of the guilty” and only an alliance can defeat it. “I don’t only fight the pistol. I fight the ones who hold it,” she said. …”

Let’s suppose we tear down the liberal world order. What replaces it? In an ideal world, the awakened White man starts to reconstruct his traditional culture and firmly push the barbarian out of his living space. That’s where this is going behind the smokescreen of “civic nationalism.” We’re aiming at the full repeal of the 20th century.

Look at where we were at around a century ago: on the eve of World War I, the White man ruled the world. America Was Great. Britain Was Great. France Was Great. Germany Was Great. Russia Was Great. Now look at what was lost as a result of World War I and World War II which were the greatest tragedy in the history of our civilization.

Dream for a moment that we could return to that world, but with an understanding that fighting among ourselves would only unleash a century of horrors and bring us to the precipice of an abyss in which our own homelands are overrun and colonized by foreigners. We’re facing a world in which our children could become a degraded, persecuted minority in their own countries – thanks to liberalism.

No, I am not idealizing the world of 1913. In hindsight, we now know the dangers of petty nationalism, which when taken to irresponsible extremes discredited the concept of nationalism. In hindsight, we now know that imperialism in the Global South led to rivalry between European states, which produced the conflagration that nearly destroyed Europe. We can be happy that states like Ireland, Poland and Serbia gained their independence. In hindsight, we now know the dangers of utopian fantasy ideologies like liberalism and communism created by crank philosophers which have become pseudo-religions that have replaced Christianity. The result has been death and sterility.

We’ve sobered up and tempered our worldview after a century of horrors. Generally speaking, we want a Northern World at peace with itself and focused on technological and commercial progress, which has rid itself of liberalism and become spiritually and culturally renewed in the process. Among other things, this would entail the end of the insane project (i.e., glorifying “diversity”) of colonizing the Northern World with Third World populations. It means the end of pseudo-moralities like political correctness which have been hatched in academia and artificially imposed on the West by the Lügenpresse. Nationalism now means fighting for France or fighting for Britain or fighting for Germany against international liberal elites and their genocidal project. We’re not fighting for Vietnam or Iraq or Algeria. We’re fighting for our own self-preservation.

We’re burying the world that was born in 1914.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.