Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
***Fundraising status – Our deficit obligations are currently at $135 down from $165, due to a kind donor who supports what we are doing. We are grateful to her and anyone else who donates in these hard economic times we are living in. We only have 3 days left before the first, so any help you can give to keep us on the net would be appreciated. We will need the balance by the first of the month of July. Please, if you feel you can afford it, donate at the pay pal button off to the right.
There is no doubt that without your help, we cannot do this alone.We have learned that lesson very well, over the past year.
We also wish to thank everyone for all their support to this point, in reading, distributing and helping fund the blog at this most important time in our history. Please do what you can no matter how small or big, to help us continue this work. Bless you all for your support over these past 4 years. This has been a real learning experience for us, here at Vatic Project. We hope it has been one for you as well.
Vatic Note: What she has shown us is something we needed very much to see….. its the game they play. Both parties are sold out as we see everyday when both parties vote for the Rothschild agenda items that are not in the best interests of this country or the American people. I worked inside the system at one time, and I saw how it works. AIPAC comes up to a group of GOP senators and says “I need you to vote for this or that”.
Many in the caucus have Israeli dual citizens as constituents and so no problem, they agree to vote for it, since a big chunk of their campaign contributions come from AIPAC, and they also show the khazar constituents who to vote for. So, the senator sells out the nation. However, there is a congressman or senator whose constituents would kick him out if he voted for it.
He does not want to lose those campaign contributions, so he finds someone else he can arm twist to vote in his place, who won't be affected by his vote, or he has 4 years left on this term, and since American voters have a short memory, He votes for it, but then has an excuse that would be acceptable, ready to give his voters should the need arise. That is how the game is played on both sides, and that is why I quit after only 3 years on the job. There was no difference between the parties, and people with integrity were squeezed out.
Who knows what this below is all about. It could be a planned event, OR it could be another fear production to get us out of our rational mind into our emotional angry mind and we then would make mistakes that would allow the evil ones to take our guns. Having said that, I am positive, at this point, that no one will readily give up their guns, since that would be a death sentence for those that do. Hitler and Nazi Zionist Germany proved that fact. Even the Russians tell us “Do not give up your guns like we did”.
Congressman Rangel (D) made the oddest statement. Did anyone catch it? Very Telling in what is happening to the Country.
http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2014/06/congressman-rangel-d-made-oddest.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SherrieQuestioningAll+%28Sherrie+Questioning+All%29
by Sherry Questioning All, June 22, 2014
I have been reading how Congressman Charles Rangel who is the longest serving Congressman in D.C. He is from New York, Harlem district and has been serving since 1971. He is 84 years old now.
His district is now 52% Hispanic due to immigration so he has a tough primary.
I was reading the story on Washington Post when I read something Rangel said that is at the least very odd and very strange besides telling in what is happening and where this country is headed.
Here is the paragraph that hit me very wrong:
“For the nation, these next two years are going to make history,” Rangel told the packed room at his birthday gathering. “These next two years are not the years for someone who just has pride and ambition, it’s for someone . . . who has the experience to guide the ship into the dark for the next two years.”
Do you see it?
“….who has the experience to guide the ship into the dark for the next two years.”
I believe that is a very negative thing to say, besides a slip of the tongue. Is that where all the D.C. people want to lead us with Obama?
The first line bothers me too…… “Next two years will make history.” Really? How? What are they planning?
Are we going into the dark now? Haven't we been in the dark? Isn't it light that we desire and deserve?
I believe his opponents should run with that sentence against Rangel.
I believe every single career politician, no matter the political side should be kicked out as Cantor was.
So, there you have it…. Rangel wants to make sure we are led into the dark for the next two remaining years of Obama's presidency and they will make history.
Update 6/25/14 – Too bad, Rangel won his primary. Why do people continue to vote in the most corrupt politicians? Why aren't people waking up?!
The majority vote for either their parent’s political party (which they, themselves, chose as a result of what THEIR parents voted), or they vote for skin color.
There is NO BASIS for Obama having ever been elected President, except for reverse racism. He had no real platform, he never explained how he was actually going to achieve a single thing he campaigned for, and he had no past experience other than 2-years in the Senate when he started. He had never worked at public work, had never managed a private business in any capacity, had never even ran a municipality as a mayor or town councilman elect. He literally had NO EXPERIENCE, but hidden money bankrolled his entry into the U.S. Senate, and once their on his FIRST TERM, he immediately was backed to go to the Presidency.
Think about that for a minute. He had no real personal money to run, yet it takes over $1-BILLION to campaign for President and to consider winning. A no-name, with no-experience was backed by the biggest financiers in the world to become President. Why? It wasn’t experience. It wasn’t track record. It wasn’t connections even (how many connections can a 45-year old have, compared to a lifetime politician like Bill or Hillary Clinton?)
How did he win? Why did he win? What did he offer, that no other person in America could better-offer his party? He was black. He was young. He was an unknown (unmired by political savagery), his past was protected, and most of all, he was a lawyer who attended ivy league schools. He was a groomed marionette for the power-elite, and his color would carry the ballot. PERIOD.
What comes next is really bad. Hillary will NEVER see Office, even though she will be ‘the next chosen one’. The power brokers are going to backstab her, and she won’t get her turn. What comes next is worse than you can imagine, and I am convinced that Rangel knows what it is, in general.
Yes he won because he was 90% funded by Wall Street. There have probably been other non-white candidates that got nowhere. The part of people that needs to conform and be racially abusive (anti-racist) towards others as well as racism on the part of blacks would have given him a popular appeal that satisfied the needs of those funding him.
Strangely, out of coincidence, I happened to be re-watching the movie “2012″ tonight, and about mid-point, right after the President (Danny Glover) refuses to board Air Force One to escape to the ark ships, he gets on the TV and basically announces to America the standard movie ‘sob line’ about how we are all one voice, one people regardless of race, and then he says,
“we are all one, going into the darkness of the void as one”
I am quite convinced now, being as this is only the second time I have ever heard ANYONE make a statement about ‘going INTO the darkness’ that the reference is to global (or at least national) cataclysm, and that this also shows that Rangel is obviously aware of this fact, by stating it.