| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
The Two Crucial Chapters of the ‘New Testament’
Monday, February 16, 2015 10:12
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
If I were required to throw away every chapter of the ‘New Testament’ but two, the chapters that I would retain would be Chapter 22 of the Gospel of Matthew and Chapter 20 of the Gospel of Luke; those Chapters in which Jesus explains that “the resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’.
Once it is understood that that was the Doctrine that Jesus taught, it is no longer relevant to that Doctrine…
Whether or not he was
‘born of a virgin’…Whether or not he was the ‘messiah’…
Whether or not he was crucified…
Whether or not he experienced a physical raising of a dead body from the grave…
And whether or not John the Baptist was Elijah ‘raised from the dead’.
The crux (interestingly enough) of the New Testament is that Jesus taught a Doctrine which was denied by both the Sadducees and the Pharisees of his time; for which Doctrine he had to be ‘eliminated’; a Doctrine which is still denied by the Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious ‘authorities’ of today.
All the rest, as they say, is ‘commentary’.
Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and
Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew) for
(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )
Hagar–>the apostle Mary–>Danielle (1982-1987)
(March, 1987—the http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)
Isaac–>the apostle John–>Robin (1986)
Ishmael–>the apostle Peter–>Cindy (1992)
Jacob–>the apostle Thomas–>Linda (1987-
Esau–>the apostle, Judas–>Susan (1970)
Isaiah’s wife–>the apostle James–>Kimberly (2000-
Follow on Twitter: @MichaElizabeth
Skype ID: deadseascrolls12
which Jesus explains that “the resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’.
This post makes little to no (as in zero) sense. Your comment that “which Jesus explains that “the resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’” is not to be found in the two chapters you mentioned. Maybe you should give some explanation and commentary rather than an unjustified comment. I suppose that perhaps you don’t expect anyone to actually read the scripture you reference and just take your word for it. I was expecting to possible learn something scriptural but instead learned that your posts have no backbone, no facts, no argumentation, actually – no anything.
Actually it’s you who is wrong. Matthew 22.29
Yeah what ever. Baptism was a pagan ceremony originally, plagiarised by the early 6th century CE church, along with everything else associated with the mystery cults, the closest being the Greek Dionysus. It’s talking about the regeneration of life in the annual solar cycle.