Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Secular Extremist Complicity With Religious Extremist Violence

Sunday, June 21, 2015 8:36
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

They are secular extremists.
 
But no one in the media is actually allowed to use such terminology, of course.
 
Because that would ‘blow their cover’.
 
They have a deep and abiding contempt for those who say that they ‘believe in God’; and, with their secular extremism, they have significantly infested academia and both the “dragon”-media and the “beast” political system; where, incredibly, they are the staunchly loyal and unwavering accomplices—before, during and after the fact—of those who perpetrate religious violence. (Thus, they are the witting or unwitting accomplices of Zionist violence, the violence of the Islamic State and Boko Haram, and the violence perpetrated by the military of the United States and other countries.)
 
To them, belief in God is nothing more than superstition.
 
To them, theology is nonsense (demonstrating that even a stopped clock is right twice a day).
 
And, even when confronted with emphatic and relentless claims of specifically theological motivations for violence; their response to what they consider to be nothing more than either a delusion or a bald-faced lie is, typically: “How quaint. But the real motivation simply had to have been either political or economic. Surely, sociology or abnormal psychology provides a much better explanation for that behavior than any theological ‘explanation’. Thus, theology can safely be ignored as not being in any way relevant (really?) to a religious conflict.”
 
This is the ‘mentality’ that has dominated every national and international conference on violent extremism that has been covered by the media or the Internet over the past year: the desperate and relentless pursuit of any ‘explanation’ other than a theological explanation; all of which, of course, is considered to be a quite ‘objective’ analysis of the problem; when, in fact, it is nothing less than a secular extremist analysis. (But, to the media,of course, there is only religious extremism. Secular extremism simply does not exist.)
 
In other words, the secular extremists are precisely as emphatic in their denial of—and precisely as blind to—the reality of theological motivations as the religious extremists are in their denial of, and blindness to the reality of previous lives:
 
http://sorendreier.com/childrens-reports-of-past-life-memories/

And, because theological explanations simply have no reality for them in the first place, they are intrinsically incapable of even seeing the problem of religious violence.

And, then, they are ‘surprised’ that they are incapable of resolving that problem.

 
The difficulty for this civilization, then, is that the Way between the Scylla of religious extremism and the Charybdis of secularism extremism is narrow indeed…
 
While those at the helm appear to be steering an ultimately fatal corkscrew wake between the two.
 
 
Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and
 

Sarah–>Elijah–>John the Baptist–>Mohammed–>Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew) for:

Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Hagar–>the apostle Mary–>Danielle (1982-1987)

(March, 1987—the http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac–>the apostle John–>Robin (1986)

Ishmael–>the apostle Peter–>Cindy (1992)

Jacob–>the apostle Thomas–>Linda (1987-

Esau–>the apostle, Judas–>Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife–>the apostle James–>Kimberly (2000-

 

 

 

 
 
Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • Pix

    “They have a deep and abiding contempt for those who say that they ‘believe in God’; ”

    That simply isn’t true. It’s not contempt for believing in God but for claiming it’s absolute truth, vilifying and slandering other people, as you are doing in your article. Your belief isn’t contemptible, your actions are.

    Your belief has been traditionally based on faith, specifically because there is no evidence to substantiate it. But these days there is plenty of evidence proving the origin of the story is pagan mystery cult. So these days your belief is not based on faith, but on denial of evidence.

    By all means, carry on believing what ever you will, but ffs stop acting like psychopaths over it.

  • Pix

    “secular extremism,”

    So let’s have it, what exactly is your problem with other people believing what they want?

    That is what this all boils down to, YOU have a problem with other peoples beliefs, in this case with equality for everyone, and their right to believe it without other people like you calling them evil.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.