| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Do Not Trust Responses from Snopes and FactCheck
I found something very interesting. Upon reviewing some of the Snopes articles, I come to the conclusion that they find me a threat because of some of the articles I have written slamming them for their lack of veracity. I have seen some of my paragraphs in their articles attempting to counter the attacks on them. However, they are smart enough not to call me out by name lest they initiate an open war on them. However, I do recognize my words and my writing style, so I know a paragraph when they quote it to refute me. I found that to be quite interesting.
The three veracity sites (Snopes, FactCheck, and TruthorFiction) are coordinating a war on me. Additionally, the left-wing bloggers depend a lot on what these veracity sites write. They put out corroborated conclusions and say, “See, we all agree; therefore, we are right.” They do not check out the truthfulness of what they read. I have done just that on several items and find their outputs to be very wanting. The left-wing bloggers will attack what I put out because I am acquiring a significant following and, therefore, they are threatened. They are so brave when they use an “Anonymous” handle. Plus that, they are all progressives and sing from the same music sheet. All I can say is “bring it on.”
Snopes.com and FactCheck.com have been proven to be producing false information as shown by over a half-dozen articles in the "Before It's News" website. You can go to that website and search for all of these Snopes articles that prove that they are lapdogs of the Obama administration.
Snopes and FactCheck have been debunked. If you believe everything you read of the propaganda that they put out, you are sadly mistaken. Speak about being partisan! We are all partisan—either left-leaning or right-leaning and, apparently, never the twain shall meet. Please review the following links (most of the articles are mine) to acquire a better insight into the Snopes and FactCheck problem:
beforeitsnews.com/story/83/370/Snopes_Exposed.html
beforeitsnews.com/story/104/321/Snopes.com,_FactCheck.org,_and_TruthOrFiction.com.html
beforeitsnews.com/story/187/619/Snopes.com_Lied_and_America_Died.html
beforeitsnews.com/story/233/523/Snopes.com_and_FactCheck.org_Disseminate_False_Information.html
beforeitsnews.com/story/104/336/Hoaxers_and_Websites_to_Check_for_Accuracy.html
beforeitsnews.com/story/176/535/Determining_the_Veracity_of_Forwarded_Emails.html
The sad thing about all of these veracity websites is that they think that they are infallible—that they do no wrong. Well, the day I begin to think I know it all as they think they do, that’s the day they would need to experience a paradigm shift and start admitting that they do put out some false information. I would be more inclined to believe them if they would just humble themselves and admit it when they are wrong, which is quite often. I am just a private citizen; whereas, they are organizations that are misleading the public. Hence, if all of you Kool-Aid drinkers desire to keep using these veracity sites as the say-all, be-all, and end-all of all knowledge, then, be my guest and enjoy your lemming existence. I want people to stand on their own two feet, do their own research, and derive their own conclusions without depending on these organizations with hidden agendas. Be forewarned and forearmed.
###
