The Copenhagen Consensus 2012 project has combined the expertise of Nobel laureates to define prioritization and economic principles to create proposals for international policy reform.
The issues researched were:
• Armed conflicts
• Biodiversity
• Population growth
• Food and Water Securitization
• Natural disasters
• World hunger
• Global warming
Cost benefits and the allocation of funding were outlined. The expert panel spoke in Denmark to coerce climate change conference attendees that these investment proposals should be enacted immediately.
At the Copenhagen conference, $75 billion, an increase of 15% in current aid, is needed to change the world for the sake of global warming.
Budget restraints did not deter the researcher’s assertion for investments in:
• Subsidies for malaria treatments
• Immunizations for poor countries like Africa and India
• Expanded childhood immunizations
• Research and development to save biodiversity from the human population
• Geoengineering research and development and eventual application
• Global vaccinations for HIV
The Global Fund is managing the Affordable Medicines Facility to expand treatments for malaria. They receive donations from UNTAID, the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and other financial contributors.
NGOs and private sector supporters assisting the AMF negotiate with pharmaceutical corporations on drugs they can disburse to countries they have identified as needy. Grants are in the process of being acquired.
Those countries defined as in need include:
• Cambodia
• Ghana
• Kenya
• Madagascar
• Niger
• Nigeria
• Tanania
• Uganda
There is a clear depopulation of Africa agenda outlined within the researcher’s proposal to the Copenhagen Conference.
Through proposals by “expert scientists”, the agenda behind climate change and biodiversity is coming into the light.
Africa has been in the spotlight with the UN and other alarmists intending to control the planet’s resources.
The UN has empowered corporations and foreign governments to begin “land grabbing” for control over African agriculture .
The United Nations (UN) has enacted global guidelines on purchasing agricultural land from developing nations like Africa and Asia.
The UN claims that to secure equality for the poor and disadvantaged, this international body must control their lands through the allowance of mutli-national corporations and governments who will develop the land for agriculture and securitize the crop yields; thereby giving the UN control over the global food supply.
The Copenhagen Consensus 2012 project is simply furthering the UN’s cause to take complete control over Africa.
Considering the plethora of natural resources in Africa, it makes perfect sense why the UN and multi-national corporations are now usurping this continent for their own use.
Susanne Posel Occupy Corporatism
