Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Alton Parrish (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

For The Rooster, Size Matters

Wednesday, September 5, 2012 4:32
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Pleiotropic genes affect comb size and egg production. 

A lone rooster sees a lot of all the hens in the flock, but the hen with the largest comb gets a bigger dose of sperm – and thus more chicks. This sounds natural, but behind all this is humanity’s hunger for eggs. 

Three eighth generation advanced intercross siblings, demonstrating the extreme variation present in a cross between red jungle fowl and domestic chicken. LiU researchers have in this study discovered two ‘pleiotropic’ genes that influence both comb size and bone mass, and thereby also egg production.

 

Credit: Dominic Wright

For thousands of years, people have tinkered with the development of domestic chickens. Through selective breeding for a few characteristics such as large muscle mass and increased egg-laying, we have at the same time caused numerous other radical changes in appearance and behaviour. A research group at Linköping University in Sweden has now shown how the size of a hen’s comb is bound up with the ability to lay more eggs. The results have been presented in the scientific journal PLOS Genetics.

Rooster and his comb
File:Rooster portrait2.jpg
Credit: Wikipedia

Compared with the original wild jungle hen, domestic hens have larger combs as well as denser bones. This influences egg-laying, as the hen’s bone tissues provide calcium for the eggshells. The greater the bone mass, the more eggs she can lay.

After having spotted a clear correlation between comb size and bone mass in chickens from a cross between red junglefowl and domestic chicken, the research group – under the leadership of evolutionary geneticist Dominic Wright – set up a study where such chickens were crossed for several generations. In this way the genome was split up into smaller and smaller regions, which allowed the “mapping” of the functions of individual genes.

In the eighth generation, the researchers found an area that had a strong effect on the weight of the comb – but also on bone mass and fertility.

Rooster (left) and hen (right)
File:Female pair.jpg
Credit: Wikipedia

The genetic variation has gradually decreased over the course of domestication. In domestic chickens there are now some 40 known small regions with stable genes that potentially govern their typical “domestic” characteristics. LiU researchers have now discovered two “pleiotropic” genes: two genes connected to each other that influence several characteristics simultaneously. By regulating the production of cartilage, they influence combs (which consist of cartilage throughout) as well as bone growth (where cartilage is the base material) and, ultimately, egg production.

“The original hens have smaller combs, thinner legs, and lay fewer eggs. When people bred for the characteristic of laying many eggs, the comb grew automatically,” Dominic Wright says.

In nature, the comb is an example of a sexual ornament. Individuals – often males – with the most impressive ornaments are favoured by females, thereby obtaining more numerous offspring than their competitors. In domesticated animals, sexual selection – like natural selection – has lost its role, as it was humans who determine breeding. 

The Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) is a tropical member of the Pheasant family. It is thought to be ancestral to the domestic chicken, with some hybridisation with the Grey Junglefowl . The Red Junglefowl was first domesticated at least five thousand years ago in Asia, then taken around the world, and the domestic form is kept globally as a very productive food source of both meat and eggs.
File:Gallus gallus -Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India-8.jpg
Credit: Wikipedia

Article: A sexual ornament in chickens is affected by pleiotropic alleles at HA01 and BMP2, selected during domestication by M Johnsson, I Gustafson, C-J Rubin, A-S Sahlqvist, K B Jonsson, S Kerje, O Ekwall, O Kämpe, L Andersson, P Jensen and D Wright. PLoS Genetics 8(8) August 30, 2012.

Contacts and sources: 

Dominic Wright
Linköping University




Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.