Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
The German entomologist Willi Hennig (called “the father of cladistics”) turned biological systematics from classifying biodiversity using the Linnean system into a belief in a single true tree of life (today called “cladistics”), thereby apparently fusing science (ie, biological systematics) with faith (for different religious beliefs in a tree of life, see Wikipedia).
It means that Hennig either turned biological systematics into a religion, ie, the belief in categories, or turned religion into science, the former confusing science with faith and the latter fusing faith with science. So, the question is: did Hennig fuse or confuse science with faith?
(Interestingly, this approach only acknowledges paradoxes (called “clades”), meaning that the question also can be framed as: are paradoxes real or abstract? If the answer is “abstract”, then the approach is something as strange as a practical search for a brain ghost, whereas if the answer is “real”, then its object of faith, ie, the tree of life, can’t be found per definition (as being a paradox). In both cases, the approach is thus a vain practical search for a void.)
Another contribution to understanding of conceptualization http://menvall.wordpress.com/
2012-11-22 03:21:57