Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Google And Rosetta Stone Settle Their Differences

Thursday, November 1, 2012 18:52
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Michael Harper for redOrbit.com – Your Universe Online

Google search is a great service, making the search for information, products and services a relatively easy affair. While Google has always worked to make the results returned to users the most accurate out there, it’s not always easy to prevent gaming the system. For instance, if someone is looking for a product to help them learn another language, the keywords they use may very well bring up an offering from Rosetta Stone.

In 2009, the language software company felt that not enough of these potential customers were being led to their products and launched a lawsuit against Google. Rosetta Stone accused Google of committing trademark infringement by selling Rosetta Stones’ trademarks to their competitors, taking business away from Rosetta Stone, Inc.

Yesterday, the two companies suddenly announced they’d settled their differences outside of a court and dismissed the suit, according to a filing in the US District Court in Alexandria, VA.

“Rosetta Stone Inc and Google have agreed to dismiss the three-year-old trademark infringement lawsuit between them and to meaningfully collaborate to combat online ads for counterfeit goods and prevent the misuse and abuse of trademarks on the Internet,” read the statement given by both companies and printed by Reuters.

As a way to guide customers to their products, advertisers will place bids with Google for the use of certain keywords. While this isn’t the only way Google will point searchers towards a particular business, the highest bid often helps an advertiser win these keywords.

Rosetta complained that Google was accepting the bids of their competitors and selling Rosetta’s trademarks to other companies.

In 2010, a Virginia federal court dismissed the case launched in 2009. This court ruled that the sale of these keywords to Rosetta’s competitors was not going to confuse consumers. Rosetta appealed this decision, and earlier this spring, the US Court of Appeal in the 4th circuit in Richmond, VA brought the majority of the case back into play. This decision allowed Rosetta to continue pursuing claims that Google diluted their brand by committing trademark infringement.

In their appeals brief, Rosetta said it was “entitled to its day in court before a properly instructed jury,” reports Don Jeffrey of Bloomberg News.

Google, on the other hand, claimed they had always been working together with Rosetta to prevent this kind of activity, saying: “each time Rosetta Stone informed Google that a particular advertiser was selling counterfeit Rosetta Stone products, Google promptly took action including removing the advertisement.”

Rosetta Stone was able to provide testimony from consumers who were tricked into buying counterfeit Rosetta software after clicking a sponsored link which they believed would take them to the genuine product.

Even the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals provided their own evidence, presenting a Google internal study which shows even the Internet Savvy consumer may not be aware that sponsored links are nothing more than paid advertisements.

Advertisers must adhere to specific terms of service when pushing their product on Google. These terms also allow advertisers, such as Rosetta, to complain when their brands are being misrepresented. While the terms of the settlement were not released, it’s likely this case has shed enough light on the matter and sent Google to fortify these terms.

redOrbit.com
offers Science, Space, Technology, Health news, videos, images and
reference information. For the latest science news, space news,
technology news, health news visit redOrbit.com frequently. Learn
something new every day.\”



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.