Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By ScienceBlogs (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

GMO viruses for coronary artery disease [erv]

Wednesday, January 9, 2013 13:12
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Whoda thought that injecting viruses into peoples hearts would be not only fun, but good for their health!  I just wrote about this little guy that can turn regular heart muscle cells into pacemaker cells (in guinea pigs), and here is another cool study hot off the presses:

Long-Term Follow-up Assessment of a Phase 1 Trial of Angiogenic Gene Therapy Using Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenoviral Vector Expressing the VEGF121 cDNA for the Treatment of Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease

There is a cell protein– VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor– that convinces your body to make more blood vessels.  Of course where there is too much VEGF around, bad things happen (some tumors need VEGF to grow, Herpes + VEGF can cause blindness), but people with  coronary artery disease have the opposite problem of cancer/HSV patients– They dont have enough bloodflow to their hearts.

So, we crack open their ribcages and do heart bypass surgery or the minimally invasive version to try to remedy the situation.

… Why not genetically modify some viruses to express VEGF in the heart to grow new blood vessels?

:-D

  • Group A– Got a traditional bypass surgery + GMO VEGF virus
  • Group B– Could not have traditional therapy for medical reasons, so only got the GMO VEGF virus via a minimally invasive procedure.
  • Group A had a 67% 5 year survival rate.
  • Group B had a 69% 5 year survival rate.
  • Traditional 5 year survival rate: 52-59% according to their literature review.

:-D

Instead of being totally screwed, Group B, who only got the GMO virus, ended up living just as people who could tolerate the traditional therapies… !!!!!

This paper also says that Group A had a 10 year survival rate of 40%, with Group B at 31% (Group B already had issues since they couldnt tolerate ‘normal’ surgeries for coronary artery disease).

Yes, they could calculate 10 year survival rates in this paper, because these are the results of a gene therapy trial that was started in 1997.

This is not some futuristic medical maybe, these are the results of a gene therapy trial that already occurred and and already helped real live human patients!  USING 1997 TECHNOLOGY.

Just for comparison, here is a Nokia cell phone from 1997:

One of its distinctive features, is that it had 8 ringtones.

:-|

Here is a modern day Nokia:

This GMO virus from 1997 helped some folks live longer. Knowing what we know today, with the new technology, the new advances we have today, what could a similar virus do?



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.