| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
Is reality really unambiguous as cladistics and particle physics assert?
Many of us wonder if reality is unambiguous or not. The problem for us to answer this question is that even if it is unambiguous, there isn’t any possibility for us to describe it unambiguously, because then this unambiguity is hidden behind orthogonal objects, paradoxically contradictory classes and ambiguous processes.
It means that it is inconsistent to assume that there is an unambiguous reality per definition. Instead, it is consistent to assume that reality is a matter of probability, as quantum mechanics suggests. In such reality, apparent contradictions in process properties or ambiguities in location (like the spin or position of a particle) can be understood as differently probable process properties or locations. In such reality, time is also relative to speed in space, because the relation between the location due to probability and to speed varies, which it on the contrary can’t be in an unambiguous reality.
Both consistency and all available facts thus supports the assumption that reality is ambiguous. This runs counter to both cladistics and particle physics, thus meaning that both of them are wrong. Both of them are led astray by their erroneous (although “natural”) assumption that reality is unambiguous. Fact appears to be that reality is ambiguous. This fact is unwanted by making reality difficult to understand, which simple-minded populists (like cladists and particle physicists) don’t like. Reality is thus just as difficult to understand that most of us (except cladists and particle physicists) think it is.
Source: http://menvall.wordpress.com/2014/06/03/is-reality-really-unambiguous-as-cladistics-and-particle-physics-assert/
