| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
Why don’t cladists and particle physicists understand that they are fundamentally wrong?
When we discuss realiy, we either try to find out whether there is an unambiguous reality to disclose or not, or assume that there is one and try to find out which. The latter approach thus assumes that the former approach already is decided (ie, that there indeed is an unambiguous reality to disclose).
However, if the latter assumption is correct, then time would not be relative to speed in space and quantum mechanics would be wrong. These facts thus falsify this assumption, instead supporting the conclusion that there isn’t any unambiguous reality to disclose at all, ie, no ultimate single Truth to find. Facts thus falsify the latter approach, instead supporting the opposite, ie, that there isn’t any unambiguous reality to disclose.
This conclusion did also Bertrand Russell arrive to in his paradox called Russell’s paradox. This conclusion was, however, purely theoretical, whereas the later discovered facts of the relativity of time to speed in space and quantum mechanics verified it empirically.
Today, we thus know that there isn’t any unambiguous reality fo disclose. In spite of this, there is still one approach claiming that there is a single true tree of life to find (called “cladistics”) and one approach claiming that it has found the particle that makes an unambiguous description of reality possible (called particle physics). We can thus safely conclude that both these approaches are wrong, because otherwise the facts that time is relative to speed in space and quantum physics would be wrong.
The question is why cladists and particle physicists don’t understand this fact?
Source: http://menvall.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/why-dont-cladists-and-particle-physicists-understand-that-they-are-fundamentally-wrong/
