Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Why Phi? – the Inex eclipse cycle, Fibonacci and Lucas

Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:43
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

“Lunar eclipse at sunrise Minneapolis October 2014″ by Tomruen – Own work. [via Wikimedia Commons]

It’s well-known that Fibonacci numbers and the Lucas series are closely related, as shown here.

There’s a lunar connection – the Inex cycle is the cousin of the shorter Saros and lasts nearly 29 years, such that:
18 Inex = 521 years
18 and 521 are both Lucas numbers

What does this tell us?

‘The significance of the inex cycle is not in the prediction, but in the organization of eclipses: any eclipse cycle, and indeed the interval between any two eclipses, can be expressed as a combination of saros and inex intervals. Also when a saros series has terminated, then often one inex after the last eclipse of that saros series, the first eclipse of a new saros series occurs. This in-coming and ex-iting of saros series separated by an interval of 29 years suggested the name for this cycle.’ – Wikipedia [bold added]

Every Lucas number is the sum of two Fibonacci numbers:
18 = 13 + 5
521 = 377 + 144

The number of sidereal months (lunar orbits) in 521 years is 6965.
6965 = 199 x 35
199 is a Lucas number (sum of two Fibonacci numbers: 144 + 55)
521y / 199 = 2.6180904 (~Phi²) = 35 sidereal months

The question then is: why do 18 Inex last 521 years, which is 199 x 35 sidereal months – where 18, 199 and 521 are Lucas numbers and 35 sidereal months is Phi² years?

The chances of this arrangement happening ‘at random’ must be remote, statistically speaking.
Therefore it appears the system is organising itself in this way.

The 521 year period has been called the ‘Hyper Saros’ and even been described as the ‘fundamental period of the solar system’ by a Belgian Professor.

NB 29 (see earlier quote) is also a Lucas number (sum of Fibonacci 21 + 8).
The Inex cycle is not exactly 29 years because 18 x 29 = 522, not 521.
Actual Inex = 521 / 18 (the two Lucas numbers) = 28.9444~ years.
Nearest Fibonacci equations: 377 / 13 = 29 exactly, 610 / 21 = 29.0476

Wikipedia also notes:
‘Although the inex series lasts much longer than the saros, it is not unbroken: at the beginning and end of a series, eclipses may fail to occur. However once settled down, inex series are very stable and run for many thousands of years.’

Another lunar cycle is the Metonic cycle (~19 years) which has a lesser-known cousin the Callipic cycle (~76 years = 4 x 19). The Greeks used it in their famous Antikythera mechanism. 76 is another Lucas number.

‘This was a more accurate approximation, obtained by taking one day away from every fourth of Meton’s cycles, so creating a 76-year cycle with a mean year of exactly 365.25 days.’

521 / 76 is almost equivalent to the Fibonacci equation 377 / 55 (about 99.98%).
Both are very close to the fourth power of phi i.e. 6.8541.

Numbers fans can pursue all this further here, or at various other sites discussing Lucas and Fibonacci numbers.



Source: https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/why-phi-the-inex-eclipse-cycle-fibonacci-and-lucas/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.