Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By ScienceBlogs (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

016/366: Depth of Field Follies [Uncertain Principles]

Wednesday, September 16, 2015 19:09
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

I’ve been doing a lot of opining on my blogs of late, and much less science-ing that I would like. So I thought I’d try bringing a little science to the photo-a-day project, by playing around with f-numbers.

I put the camera on the tripod, with my fastest lens (a 50mm f/1.8 prime) and set up an array of SteelyKid’s Lego minifigs to be targets. Then I shot pictures of the scene at different aperture settings spanning the full range I could select. The two extremes are shown here:

Lego minifigs shot with the two extremes of my fastest lens. Top is f/22, bottom f/1.8.

Lego minifigs shot with the two extremes of my fastest lens. Top is f/22, bottom f/1.8.

I had to put it on manual focus, otherwise it went nuts trying to decide what to autofocus on, and as you can see, I didn’t get it quite dialed in on the frontmost minifigs. I kind of like the fact that it’s got that one bit of dog hair on the wagon zeroed in perfectly, though. The lens is a bit over 20cm from the table, because the tape measure I have here doesn’t have SI units on it, so I put it about 8 inches away (about the closest it would focus on). Each Lego set-up is 8 inches behind the next.

Because I’m a great big nerd, I took photos all the way through this sequence, and here’s a representative set of f-numbers (I left the exposure time on auto, which means some of the smaller apertures had rather long exposures, and a few of those pictures got some motion blur from me pushing the button; I left those out):

f/22:
f22

f/16:
f16

f/11:
f11

f/8:
f08

f/5.6:
f056

f/4.5:
f045

f/3.5:
f035

f/2.8:
f028

f/1.8:
f018

Kind of impressive how rapidly the depth of field shrinks as you get toward the bottom. The factor-of-2 difference between f/22 and f/11 doesn’t make much difference, but going from f/3.5 to f/1.8, wow. which, you know, is not that surprising on an intellectual numbers-on-paper sort of level– it’s optical physics, after all– but it’s something else to see the effect on the images.

Anyway, there’s your highly nerdy photo-of-the-day. Next time I feel the need to do this, we’ll play with ISO values in the dark basement…



Source: http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2015/09/16/016366-depth-of-field-follies/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.