| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
How to Make Diesel Fuel from Water and Air
Let’s face it: hydrocarbons are second hand energy sources. Trees and other plants absorb electromagnetic radiation from the Sun and use that energy to convert water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen into sugars that the plant needs to survive, and then, when they die, we use their flesh as biomass fuel, or they get crushed under the earth for a few million years and then up from the ground comes a bubblin’ crude, oil that is, Texas “T”.
Well, that’s just friggin’ inefficient! Of course, you can’t blame the plants, the purpose of their existence is hardly to power your monster truck or RV. But, really, hydrocarbons are simple molecules: you take hydrogen (hydro) combine it with carbon (yes that’s where the carbon part comes from) and you get hydrocarbons. The smallest kind we call natural gas, or methane (CH4), and the biggest kind we call candle wax or paraffin (C31H64). Somewhere in the middle is the liquid forms that we’ve come to know and love such as pentane (C5H12) and octane (C8H18) that make up gasoline, or a mixture of saturated hydrocarbons that range from C10H20 to C15H28 called diesel fuel.
It took millions of years for biomass to cook and seep naturally into these rather unremarkable assemblages of common elements, and right now we’re mainly using the old stuff. But why can’t we just cut out the geological middle-man (the middle-earth perhaps?) and make these compounds ourselves? Well, the Germans seem to have a head start on that project: Audi, maker of overpriced… I mean finely engineered import cars has funded the German tech company Sunfire on a path that will start generating 3000 liters of what they call “Blue Crude”.
“Blue Crude” can be refined into a cleaner diesel fuel that doesn’t contain sulphur or any other contaminants typically found in conventional diesel fuel, and so automobiles that run on this “e-diesel” will run cleaner and quieter.
“The engine runs quieter and fewer pollutants are being created,” Christian von Olshausen of Sunfire said.
This “e-diesel” is also maintains a high cetane number, which, in the parlance of diesel powered automobiles, means that it ignites easier when injected into hot compressed air.
The process is actually pretty simple. You heat steam up to about 1472 degrees Fahrenheit (Using renewable energy sources of course!) so that the hydrogen-oxygen bonds break down and you end up with free hydrogen and oxygen atoms. Then you inject carbon dioxide at high pressures to combine the carbon and hydrogen into saturated hydrocarbons:
10CO2 + 10H2O + <heat and pressure> → 1C10H20 + 15O2
sunfire’s vision is to create a closed carbon cycle using renewable energy, carbon dioxide (CO2), and water (H2O) to provide sustainable fuels. These fuels will power cars, planes, and ships for mobility, as well as staxera’s high-temperature fuel cells (SOFC) for decentralized electricity generation without changes to current fuel distribution infrastructure. sunfire develops and sells high-efficient, sustainable, and reliable technologies with a clear perspective to become cost competitive with current technology. - Sunfire GmbH
And what’s awesome is that you get rid of 10 carbon dioxide molecules and release 15 oxygen molecules for every 1 hydrocarbon you generate. Now, if you burn that, you’re just releasing carbon that you’ve already sequestered for a time. BAMMO! Carbon neutrality in practice. Just imagine if you could also capture the exhaust from these vehicles and use it as feedstock for yet more fuel, why bother just letting it go into the air? But that’s an engineering problem for another time.
One might ask oneself if one often talked to oneself like a crazy person: Why not put that renewable energy into the grid for electric vehicles? Why make something that’s just going to get burnt and spewed back out into the atmosphere? Well, while electric cars are cool (I have one, trust me, it’s like riding a rubber band), there is still the problem of energy storage. Batteries have come a long way in the near 200 years that we’ve been developing them, but we’re not quite there yet. No matter how cool Tesla’s new battery is, it still can’t store an equivalent amount of energy as saturated hydrocarbons. Electric vehicles have a size problem: you can get a $100,000 sports car to go over 200 miles on a charge, but a semi-truck is a different story. Long range transport will continue to rely on hydrocarbon based fuels for some time to come, and the cleaner our sources for that fuel, the better. Plus, this process pulls carbon dioxide out of the air and sequesters it, something that an electric car doesn’t do. And, unless your electric car is charged by 100% carbon-free renewable energy, it won’t be as close to carbon neutral as a diesel truck running straight e-diesel. In either case, closing the carbon cycle and reducing the use of million-year-old hydrocarbons is just one tool in the toolbox for building a sustainable future.
Make a Biogas Generator to Produce Your Own Natural Gas
DIY – 10,000 Watt Generator Running On Fumes Only!
600 Watt Water Powered Generator Made from an Old Washing Machine
Liberty Generator
Pump Water Without Electricity – energy of flowing water
DIY Water Filter
How to Make an ARC Welder (VIDEO)
World’s Biggest Blackout! 620 Million People Without Power. Are You Prepared?
How To Cook Rice With 80 Percent Less Fuel!
Any sort of innovation improving supply-chain efficiency and ecological cleanliness is a good thing… and the prospect of manufacturing 100% pure, non-toxic, (partially-)closed-loop hydrocarbon fuels is a cool one to me personally…
However, let me burst this bubble a little bit:
> Artificial creation of hydrocarbons is nothing new. I learned about it on a whim, in ONE night, about three years ago. It’s called the Fischer-Tropsch Process (among many probably identical processes). Anyone who’s gone through high-school Chemistry could’ve figured this process out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer%E2%80%93Tropsch_process
> If the goal is to power things as efficiently as possible, hydrocarbon synthesis is an overall waste of energy.
So, one would generate electricity (even with ‘clean’ sources), and then lose a large amount of that energy in transmission / heat / mechanical energy lost in producing the fuel, ending up with some tiny fraction of the energy in the original electrical power present in the end device using the hydrocarbon fuel?
Would it take less effort / energy overall to just retool your hydrocarbon-powered device (basically, a Vehicle) to work off an electric power source? With a rough consideration of the amount of energy required between the two approaches, I strongly suspect retooling would indeed require less energy in both the short and long terms.
> Don’t forget that Electric Cars were born directly alongside gasoline cars… the only limitation upon them was the short range. One finds it odd, however, that in a time of such exponential growth in innovation, that ALL innovation in batteries seems to have stopped cold for the better part of a Century.
http://energybytesla.org/electric-car/nikola-teslas-free-energy-car
> The link directly above also notes the possibility of a brand-new level of innovation in the purported 1931 Pierce Arrow, converted to an AC electric motor and powered freely, nonstop, by a radiant-energy device. Though of course this may be a hoax, it’s worthy of serious investigation, if for no other reason than the story’s credibility rides on the excellent resume of Tesla.
Conclusion:
I’d suggest that any research effort in this arena (energy innovation) be spent trying to recover and reproduce the experiments (and successes) of Nicola Tesla a/o Thomas Henry Moray, or those of Stanley Meyer.
Electricity is a far more transmissible, far lower-overhead-in-infrastructure, far cleaner, and (possibly) infinitely more-easily-and-abundantly-procured than any kind of consumable fuel source.
Start on Patrick Kelly’s site. http://www.free-energy-info.com/
I suggest skipping directly to Chapter 7. http://www.free-energy-info.com/Chapter7.pdf
Yes, I am pursuing these on my own, but many of you have more resources (money / property / a room or shack to turn into a laboratory / free time / etc.) that will allow you to make far more progress more quickly.
This idea above will never work.
Spare me the argument that you are using it now. It will never work. And your video link is to some other site.
EPIC FAIL.