Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Phil Plait and PZ Myers argued against ET fossils in meteorite Polonnaruwa (note 1). Before Chandra Wickramasinghe’s team publishes further evidence, I find the following figures support the claim that the rock is not terrestrial, and that the diatom is not recently living: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1783033891&p=117
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1783033892&p=118
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1783033893&p=119
Sources of above figures: Fig. 4, Fig. 3 and Fig. 1 in original article at http://journalofcosmology.com/JOC21/PoloaruwaERR.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonnaruwa_(meteorite)
See also http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/2013/01/fossil-diatom-found-in-meteorite.html