Of Tinfoil Hats and Mind Control: Remote Mind Reading & Programming Apparatus
When confronted with talk of advanced technologies and weapon systems, it is amazing how quickly people with no concept of technological progression, resort to “tinfoil hat,” comments in a laughing and often disdainful fashion. But the real question should be, is there any truth to what those “crazy tin-foil hatters” are claiming?
Mind-beams, mind-control, remote neural monitoring, ray guns, and crazy allusions to “Directed Energy Weapons (DEWS)?”
Many listeners say these assertions sound like delusional ramblings, or the like the plot of a B-grade science-fiction movie, but is there any truth to these seemingly far-fetched conjectures? Is it possible that these “tin-foil hatters” are the “round-earthers” of the 1300s, who were considered to be “mad-as-hatters” versus “tin-foil hatters?”
It is important to remember that the U.S. Government is many decades in advance of what the public is aware of, technologically-speaking. Did you know that U.S.A.F. fighter pilots have been using thought-operated weapons systems for twenty years or more?
When a university, group, or individual announces a new patent or the beta-testing of a technology, and it has value to the defense industry, there is a good chance that it has already been around for several decades and is being revealed to the public through a controlled leak, a new toy, or a techie article.
In 2015, the U.S. Navy announced that they had “recently” developed a laser-based weapons system which could “disable a boat motor” from several kilometers away. What they failed to announce was that by the 1980′s, several militaries already had the capability to blast satellites from ground-based platforms with laser-based weapons.
While the public has heard a lot about drones being used in the Middle East, the U.S. Military used them in Viet Nam as well. So with the revelation of laser-technology and drone-use, we see at least a three to four decade lag-time for information release, and even after that lag-time, the technological capacities are greatly downplayed, since the general public does not have the “need-to-know.”
Here is a 2007 publication which references a patent for 1970s technology, a mind-controlled weapons systems under development by a team at Duke University: http://www.wired.com/2007/03/mind_controlled/
There are also toys (yes, toys) on the market, which are thought-controlled by the user’s brainwaves:
http://www.fastcoexist.com/1680882/the-helicopter-that-reads-your-brainwaves
Now here is food “for thought:” If there are devices (and toys) available to the public, which can be worn physically, which can intercept or scan brainwave patterns, translate them, and process them in order to create signals, is it a far stretch to assume that the government may have the technology to pull off the same feat remotely, without a headset, or some type of physical contact?
The thought-controlled toy helicopter is available to the public. So what is the chance that this technology “leaked” out to the general public, without already being employed (and possibly deployed) by the government for decades – or even longer?
In the 1960s, a scientist named Delgado proved that it was possible to stop a charging bull in its tracks via radio waves. He implanted a device (electrodes) in the bull’s brain, affixed an antenna to the implant and was able to modify the bull’s thought processes (brainwave patterns) through the transmission of a radio signal, which resulted in subtle electrical stimulations.
Here is a link to a YouTube video about the 1965 experiment (that’s right – 1965), reported in a 1985 CNN documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23pXqY3X6c8
News of that experiment was released to the public in 1965, and there is a significant lag-time between the technology the government has in its possession and is capable of deploying, and what the public is aware of.
If the results of the Delgado Bull experiment were made available to the public in 1965, how much technological capability did the government really have which the public was not made aware of at that time?
In the 1980’s, remote controlled cars had large whip antennas, and the hand-held remotes which controlled them also had large telescoping antennas. As mentioned earlier in this article, toys today can be controlled remotely by brainwave patterns and the vehicles are lacking their once-conspicuous whip antennas.
So once again, what does the government have in its secret arsenal that the general public is not aware of? Could they possibly control large sectors of the population through microwave and radio-wave emissions, without the need for whip antennas, or is that the realm of science-fiction movies and the “crazed” tinfoil hat crowd?
A Google search for the “Moscow Signal,” reveals that in the 1950′s, the Russians began beaming microwaves at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. In response the CIA began a secret research project called “Pandora.” The Pandora Project studied the effect of microwave radiation on the central nervous system (CNS) and quickly came to the conclusion that exposure to this type of radiation resulted in adverse effects on the nervous system of the targeted individuals, who in this case were diplomats.
The embassy personnel began to suffer emotionally, physically, physiologically, and psychologically from the microwave “shower” they were standing in on a daily basis. They suffered from stress, fatigue, decreasing work productivity – due to something referred to as cognitive impairment, a lower white blood cell count, an increase in illnesses, a lowering of their immune system response capability, and a higher incidence of various types of cancers later in life.
Now the Russians were fixated on remotely disabling or hampering the operational functionality of the embassy staff, by beaming them with microwaves in the 17 Hz range. But subsequent to the Moscow Signal incident and the Pandora Project, scientists discovered that various waves and combinations of wave types elicit different responses in humans. It is possible to induce aggression, fear, sleepiness, arousal, anger, or feelings of flight or fight – remotely, through the transmission of various frequencies.
Here is a link to a Rense article by Tim Rifat which discusses the implementation of different types of wave transmissions to impact the behavior of the general population, as well as police and military which utilize certain types of two-way radio systems: http://www.rense.com/general11/mm.htm
For those of you interested in researching the effects of certain radio frequencies and their impact on the behavior of law enforcement officers and military personnel, Google the “TETRA” Project. TETRA is the acronym for Terrestrial Trunked Radio, which uses frequencies that are powerful enough to have adverse effects on brainwave patterns, not normally observed with the usage of more traditional, non-TETRA, two-way radio systems.
So the next logical question is, would governments utilize this technology against the general population, in order to alter its mood, or “mind-control” them? Would you be surprised if I said that the answer was yes?
In a 2005 article entitled Microwaving Iraq: Pacifying” Rays Pose New Hazards To Iraqis, author William Thomas discusses the deployment of “Poppers” or transmitters which broadcast various signals oft different bandwidths (ULF, VLF and UHF).
The effects these signals had on the targeted population varied. Some people became depressed, their productivity decreased and they experienced what Westerners refer to as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In other individuals, it trigged violent and unpredictable behavior. Even U.S. troops working in the areas where “Poppers” were deployed, demonstrated higher incidents of going AWOL, binge-drinking and other behavioral anomalies.
The majority of this article has examined the impact of externally produced waves on thought patterns and behavior, versus mind-reading technology which even Spock would have been jealous of. And even Spock needed physical contact with his subject before commencing the “Vulcan Mind Meld.” But is it possible that remote interception of thoughts or brainwave patterns has evolved far beyond what the public assumes is possible? Strap on your tin-foil hats people! Once again, the answer is yes.
Now remember, when the government releases information on available technology, they are referencing beta-studies which occurred a decade or two before the dissemination of the information to the general public. In 2004, NASA announced that “NASA scientists … [had begun] to computerize human, silent reading using nerve signals in the throat that control speech.”
In a nutshell, this means that interception of the thought-to-speech linkage was possible “via a small sensor,” in 2004, or at least that was when this information was released to the public. Since the transmission between the brain and vocal chords is not spoken, it is referred to as “sub-vocalization,” and could also be called “pre-vocalization,” since it is the step which precedes speech. So in 2004 NASA announced that they had developed what could be referred to as sub-vocalization or pre-vocalization interception and translation technology.
Now step back a second and remember that there are toys which can be controlled by a headset, weapons-systems which are controlled by thought patterns, and forward-looking infra-red systems which the military, law enforcement and fire departments utilize to passively and remotely view individuals which appear as dynamic and fluid images, thermally defined. These hand-held imaging devices can be bought on E-bay for as little as $1500, and have been around for at least two decades – to fire departments.
So, if one were to utilize a combination of this technology available to the general public (or a few tech-savvy 19 year-olds), for the past two decades, what could they come up with, or produce? What could be made from a combination of these “publicly-known” technologies? And remember, what the public has access to and is aware of is at least a generation or two behind what the government has in its arsenal.
In 1976, Robert G. Malech was granted a patent for an Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and Altering Brain Waves. It is referred to as Patent US 3951134 A.
When radar of two frequencies is beamed at an individual, or groups of individuals, the two frequencies combine within their inter-cranial cavity to create a scalar field. The scalar field interacts with the subjects brainwave patterns and allows for the brainwaves to be translated and “read.” But the technology was also engineered in reverse, allowing for those subjects, much like Delgado’s famous bull, to have their brainwaves remotely altered.
According to the Google Patent Abstract: Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject in which the signals interfere with one another to yield a waveform which is modulated by the subject’s brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of the brain wave activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where it is demodulated and amplified. The demodulated waveform is then displayed for visual viewing and routed to a computer for further processing and analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a desired change in electrical activity therein.
If one examines the technologies which have been patented and made public over the past 65 years, it is easy to imagine what is available to governments with unlimited funds to “guarantee national security” today.
Remember that the biggest secrets are hidden in plain view.
An edited version of this article appeared on February 14th, 2016 on IntelliHub.
