Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By mitchell179 (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Absolute Proof NASA Is Doctoring And Covering Up What Is Really On The Moon

Wednesday, June 6, 2012 22:27
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Is this the evidence we have been waiting for? Does this video below provide proof that NASA has deliberately doctored photos from the moon landings to cover something up?

 

Ever since the Apollo missions to the moon, there have been lots of conspiracy theories out there that either try to say that the moon landings never happened or that NASA purposely edited out things they did not want the public to see in photos. Normally, I dismiss these theories almost right away as they never do a good job in showing any conclusive proof. Recently, however, I came across a video on YouTube that really got me thinking. It is a collection of photos from the moon landings that have been cleaned up using special software. What is amazing is that all of the photos show deliberate doctoring of parts of each picture.

 

http://socyberty.com/folklore/proof-that-nasa-doctored-moon-photos-coverup-exposed

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 5 comments
  • steven

    Groan, of course the pictures are doctored, that’s because they couldn’t take pictures on the moon because the radiation levels would have destroyed picture quality very very severely , unless they used a lead camera, which of course they didn’t . All pictures supposedly taken on the moon were faked, time to apply some common sense.

  • Pls pls, ask the Russians. They were drunk on Vodka when Neil Amstrong landed on the moon. Ha ha ha…..they celebrated the landing with such hilarious laugh they became drunk as a result.

  • Pix

    There are no images of the moon, taken on the moon. They didn’t have digital photography when they landed on it and ordinary film is subject to radiation exposure. Have a look at the original landing films. The rocket lifts off the moons surface, the camera follows it up, it overshoots the rocket, comes back down, undershoots it, but eventually finds it again. All perfectly fine and normal, until you realise that there would be a considerable time delay on any remote device taking movies on the moon. It’s faked as are all the original photos.

  • Shadow

    “It occurs to me that the primary agenda of the powers that be is to induce FAITH. Faith means you are obligated to not think stuff through—whatever they tell you not to think through. And, the thoughts they find really threating they label as insane. But, if you can’t have real faith, at minimum, you are required to take the system seriously. I take the system seriously. In ten years, they may inprison me for my ideas. Is this a paranoid fear or a realistic concern? I would fear it less if our Department of Homeland Security didn’t monitor the websites I visit or books I buy or check out from the library.

  • Who took the pictures of Neil Armstrong first’s foot steps on the moon,
    who put the camera on the surface of the moon to capture this historic event, who, who, WHO ?

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.