Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
If I could do it over, I would not let primitive
reproductive instincts dominate my life.
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
As I get older, I notice that my attitude to women and sex is becoming more “Biblical” — not from reading the Bible, but from experience.
Increasingly, for a man, women and sex are a diversion and impediment to serving God, through his work.
If not for sex, would men and women even associate?
Some men have Platonic friendships with women but, is this common?
Procreation is perhaps our most powerful biological instinct. Male-female relationships are rooted in sexual attraction. Both men and women are hardwired to procreate: men to want every fertile female he sees; females to want babies.
Our Illuminati masters have subtly deflected these powerful instincts for purposes of social control. They have created a fantasy version of sex and love.
Men and woman are now fantasy facsimiles of themselves. They want sex and romance but not children. Sex totally dominates their lives. It crowds out everything else, especially thought, and sells almost any product.
DO OVER
If I were 21 again and single, I would not allow my primitive reproductive instincts to dominate my life. Frankly, I would use masturbation to neutralize sexual desire and the generalized “need” for women.
I would remove sexual attraction from my relations with women. It tends to crowd out everything else. You pursue women that otherwise you wouldn’t give the time of day.
Conversely, I would try to connect with women on a profounder level.
Confining sex to courtship and marriage used to do this. If a man and woman wanted to sleep together, they would have to be together first.
SOUL MATES?
The Bible portrays women as helpmates, not soul mates.
How many people have found their soul mate? Is this realistic? After all, God is our soul mate. Turning a person into a soul mate is often a delusion, and a form of idolatry.
Can anyone follow your personal spiritual trajectory? isn’t it Isn’t it terribly egotistical to expect this?
I do not accept the Illuminati shibboleths that a man needs (to satisfy) a woman to become a man. Becoming a man has nothing to do with sex. It involves power (being effective, achieving goals) not sex.
That’s it:
Why my attitude to women has become more “Biblical” with age. Why, if I could do it over, I would not waste my life in the pursuit of chimeras like sex and romance.
Exposing Feminism and the New World Order. See more
2012-07-29 11:26:02
Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/but_for_sex_would_men_women_as.html
And you are forgetting that before your disgusting violent religion was enforced on pain of death, women had equal rights, marriage was only something you did arfter you had a child and only then if you wanted to ensure your child inherited the wealth from BOTH parents, ie not necessarily the farthers wealth because women had equaltiy and had wealth of their own.
That’s the trouble with your lop sided reliigion, it’s too orientated towards squashed penis’s, when the real magic of the world orignates from women and their ability to create new life. Men are such pathertic jealous creatures they want to own women, because women don’t have a problem with knowing if their kids are theirs whlie men can never be 100% certain. So instead of being real men, they turn into jealous pettly dictators and invent stupid religions to justify their disgusting sexist behaviour.
My attitude towards sex has changed as I have aged:
In my teens, nothing was more important
In my twenties, it was still very important
In my thirties, it was still fun
in my forties, a pleasant diversion
in my fifties, a necessarily task
In my sixties, I’ll hide and try no to think about it
In my seventies, I will have forgotten why
In my eighties I will forgotten how…