Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Russians Learned “Gun Control” Lesson

Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:33
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

bolguns.jpeg
Moscow fell to the Bolsheviks not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds.”

Russian warns Americans not to fall for this trick again.

Do not be fooled by a belief that
progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is
guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step to their
ideology.

by Stanislav Mishin
“Russian says: Americans Never Give Up Your Guns” slightly abridged)
(Pravda.ru)

These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.

This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. 

It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington’s [i.e. Illuminati Jewish bankers] clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. 

Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed.

The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. 

From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the USSR, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense.

Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere….but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

guncontrol.jpegCONCLUSION

No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed.

Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step to their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

——-
Thanks to John Dinardo for sending this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9ZvwPmjJu4



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 4 comments
  • Fidel Castro said the same things – “Armas para que?” (translated: ‘Guns, for what?’)”

    Well the answer is – to enslave the people once they are disarmed, and his thugs were fully armed to make sure they could never overthrow him or leave his slave island.

    Yes it’s true – the left LOVES guns as long as THEY are the only ones that have them.

  • Gandhi said “I wish I had as many guns as the British”
    No, I was lying. He didn’t say that at all. Funny though innit how the suberbly armed Brits lost India. If only they’d had more guns. I think most of the problems in this world could be quite easily solved if ordinary folk like you and me had access to some decently lethal weapons so we could mutually blow each others heads off. End of argument I think.

    • “Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.” – Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography, page 446

      In case you missed the real quote and are not just an disinformation agent.

      • I know the quote. I think it’s very un-Gandhi-like. I repeat, funny isn’t it that a completely disarmed India threw off British rule. Sardonic remark – would more guns have helped the situation?

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.