Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Surviving In Argentina
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Modern Survival Manual on American Thinker

Tuesday, March 12, 2013 3:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)


I’m proud to see that my book, “The Modern Survival Manual: Surviving the Economic Collapse” was referenced to on
American Thinker as expert´s advice. (thanks Rand for the heads up!)
The article called “How to Destroy a Rich Country” written
by Mike Konrad, explains how Argentina is a case study of bad politics and
corruption.
Here’s part of the article, follow the link to read
the rest.
FerFAL


How to Destroy a Rich Country

By Mike Konrad

October 22, 2012

The
next election may determine where America is headed — to a restoration
of its greatness, or to a retreat into the obsolescence of history. 
Before one casts a vote, an example stands before us of a country that
made the wrong choice, warning us what to avoid.

The
country is Argentina, chiefly unknown to most Americans, apart from its
creation of the tango . This ignorance on our part is inexcusable,
since Argentina resembles an America that went awry.

Argentina’s statistics are astounding.

Argentina
is a little less than half the size of the continental United States,
with a climate that runs from polar in the south to tropical in the
north.  Most of Argentina’s land mass is in the subtropical belt, where
one finds the pampas — arguably the best beef- and grain-growing region
on the planet.  The warm extended growing season gives Argentina an
advantage over our cooler Kansas and Nebraska.  There are times when
Argentina has
exceeded the USA in cattle product exports,
and this production has been going on for over a century.  Its grain
exports are enormous, and much of the planet depends on Argentina for
food.  This is all the more amazing when one considers that Argentina
has only 41 million people, one eighth
the population of the United States.  In the early 20th century, the ratio vis-à-vis the United States was even smaller, and still the Argentines could outperform us on agricultural exportsat times.

Argentina, like the United States, had massive European immigration from 1870 to 1920.  Large numbers of Italians, Germans, French, Jews,Welsh,
Christian Arabs from Syria and Lebanon, Swiss, Basques, Croats, and
Galacians from Northwest Spain settled in.  There were even some
Irish, English, Poles, Ukrainians, and Scandanavians, though in considerably smaller numbers.
Blacks constitute only 3% of the Argentine genome,
and most of those who carry African genes are now partly white through
intermarriage.  The chief nonwhite minority are the indigenous native
Indians, who constitute about 19% of the Argentine genome.

On
a genetic level, Argentina may be more “European” than we Americans,
though tending more to the Mediterranean than the Nordic.  About half
the population has traces of Indian blood, but even these often pass for
swarthy whites.  For all intents and purposes, Argentina, until
recently, was a white European country, and boasted of it.  The real
shocker is that Spanish-speaking Argentina may have more Italians than
Spanish, which is why they say ciao (which they spell chau) rather than adiós.

It also has a liberal constitution roughly based on the American model.



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.