| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Treason By Administration In Libya?
Karl Denninger / Market Ticker
Well well well what do we have here?
I’ve talked a bit about rumors that just won’t die that our real purpose in being in Libya with that “Diplomatic Mission” was more related to trying to buy back portable anti-aircraft missiles that we sold or gave to Gaddafi (or was it the “Rebels”) and then went “missing.”
Now it appears that we have national media that are talking about it and have uncovered proof that these are not just rumors.
Our national hubris in handing a thug anti-aircraft missiles that are both man-portable and not secured is pretty far over the line. What’s worse is that when we discovered they had “disappeared” we apparently then turned around and stuck a ****load of cash in what amounted to an unguarded CIA outpost-cum-”safehouse” and tried to buy them back.
Ok, it wasn’t quite unguarded. But it was damn close, and it was certainly not sufficiently guarded, as we now know.
The ugly of course is that this adds materially to the coverup attempt that Obama and his administration attempted to pull when the attack happened. Not only are there emails that form hard documentation that the White House knew that this was a raid and not in response to some “Youtube video” in addition they knew damn well what they were doing there and that the “mission” was a high-value military target in that it held both large sums of cash and weapons.
This is damn close to treason folks, and I do not use that word lightly.
Where’s the info come from about the cash for weapons stuck in the ‘mission?’