| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
TREASON? As SecState, Hillary Ordered Added Security For Benghazi Prior To September 11th, 2012. Those Requests Were Denied, Resulting in Murder – By Whom?
Was the US gun running weapons through Turkey to aid the Syrian Rebels?
Could the Benghazi fallout, go beyond what a Public Relations firm can handle?
Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, came forward to “take responsibility overall” for the attacks at Benghazi, but per Ed Klein we now know behind the scenes Bill Clinton advised his wife to resign over the possible criminal fallout of the Benghazi massacre.
Today we learn from sources that not only did Hillary ask for added security, and was denied, but her closest advisers strongly suggested she seek legal counsel just days after the attack.
Why?
Why did “they” deny Hillary’s requests for added security to Benghazi, and why is this a situation in which a Secretary of State would need personal legal counsel?
Could the Benghazi fallout, go beyond what a Public Relations firm can handle? I’d say YES.
Could this be a criminal act, negligence, dereliction of duty, which resulted in murder? I’d say YES.
And I’d say that Hillary is telling the truth as the “source” of these latest developments come straight from her “legal counsel”. Hillary did prior to September 11th, 2012 order added security for Benghazi, and those requests were denied—but by who?
To fully understand what happened in Benghazi, we need to step back. Ambassador Stevens was located in a CIA safe house (otherwise known as the building burned down during attack)–that location is where on the night of the attack he dined with the Turkish General Counsel. Why?
FULL STORY HERE
