Imagine the agroance of seeing a $0.23 charge on your phone bill and discovering that it’s a charge passed on to the consumer due to the NSA spying on you!
Fake. A very poorly done photo shop job. Not only does the columns not add up to $3.99 as suggested, why are there 6 amounts of charges for only 5 descriptions?
A really bad copy/paste job and people STILL fall for it. Is that $0.61 charge for Obamas cell phones?
I’m getting mixed information about this. Can anyone prove AT&T is charging customers this fee other than this phone bill we see? I would love to see it and maybe put it to rest if it’s a hoax. http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/interception.asp
Fake. For the simplest verification. Total the column of numbers (or even just the cents column) it totals $3.71 not $3.99.
CORRECTION: it is not .23 it will be $23.00 and the price raises.
Hey anything for ATT and large major corporatism to keep their profits in check, not yours.
Fake. A very poorly done photo shop job. Not only does the columns not add up to $3.99 as suggested, why are there 6 amounts of charges for only 5 descriptions?
A really bad copy/paste job and people STILL fall for it. Is that $0.61 charge for Obamas cell phones?
Correction: Why pay phone bill in first place?
What the hell is ‘agroance’?
I’m getting mixed information about this. Can anyone prove AT&T is charging customers this fee other than this phone bill we see? I would love to see it and maybe put it to rest if it’s a hoax. http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/interception.asp